AlexanderG. C.1992, April. The Transformation of an Urban Principal: Uncertain Times, Uncertain Roles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
2.
AndersonM. E.1991. Principals: How to Train, Recruit, Select, and Evaluate Leaders for America's Schools.University of Oregon. (ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, ED 337843)
3.
AndersonR. J. and DeckerR. H.. 1993, February. “The Principal's Role in Special Education Programming.”NASSP Bulletin, 1–5.
4.
AndersonG. L., HerrK. and NihlenA. S., 1994. Studying Your Own School: An Educator's Guide to Qualitative Practitioner Research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
5.
BarkerS. L.1997, November. “Is Your Successor in Your School-house? Finding Principal Candidates.”NASSP Bulletin, 85–91.
6.
BennettA. L., BrykA. S., EastonJ. Y., KerbowD., LuppescuS. and SebringP. A.. 1992. Charting Reform: The Principals Perspective.Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
7.
BolmanL. G. and DealT. E.. 1994. “Looking for Leadership: Another Search Party's Report.”Education Administration Quarterly, 30 (1): 77–96.
8.
BredesonP.1989, March. Redefining Leadership and Roles of School Principals: Responses to Changes in the Professional Worklife of Teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
9.
BredesonP.1993. “Letting Go of Outlived Professional Identities: A Study of Role Transition and Role Strain for Principals in Restructured Schools.”Educational Administration Quarterly, 29 (1): 34–8.
10.
BromleyD. B.1986. The Case Study Method in Psychology and Related Disciplines.New York: Wiley.
11.
BrownD.1992. “The Recentralization of School Districts.”Educational Policy, 6 (3): 289–297.
12.
CaldwellB. J.1992. “The Principal as Leader of the Self-managing School in Australia.”Journal of Educational Administration, 30 (3): 6–19.
13.
ChapmanJ.1990. School-based Decision-making and Management: Implications for School Personnel. In ChapmanC. (Ed.), School-based Decision-making and Management (pp. 221–224). London: Falmer.
14.
ChristensenG.1992, April. The Changing Role of the Administrator in an Accelerated School. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
15.
DevosG., Van denBroeck, and VanderheydenK.1998, December. “The Concept and Practice of a School-based Management Contest: Integration of Leadership Development and Organizational Learning.”Educational Administration Quarterly, 34: 700–717.
16.
DukeD. L.1992. “The Rhetoric and Reality of Reform in Educational Administration.”Phi Delta Kappan, 73 (10): 764–770.
17.
Education Commission of the States.1990, February. State Policy and the School Principal.Denver: Author.
18.
Educational Research Service.1998. Is There a Shortage of Qualified Candidates for Openings in the Principalship: An Exploratory Study.Available: html//www.nassp.com.
19.
FordD. J.1992, April. Chicago Principals under School-based Management: New Roles and Realities of the Job. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
20.
GoetzJ. P. and LecompteM. D.1984. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research.Orlando, FL: Academic Pres.
21.
GoldmanP., DunlapD. M. and ConleyD. T.1991, April. Administrator Facilitation and Site-based School Reform Projects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
22.
GoldringE. B.1992. “Systemwide Diversity in Israel: Principals As Transformational and Environmental Leaders.”Journal of Educational Administration, 30 (3): 49–62.
23.
GoodladJ.1984. A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future.New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
HallerE. J., BrentB. O. and McNamaraJ. H.1997, November. “Does Graduate Training in Educational Administration Improve America's Schools?Phi Delta Kappan, 79 (3): 222–227.
25.
HallingerP. and HausmanC.. 1993. The Changing Role of the Principal in a School of Choice. In MurphyJ. and HallingerP. (Eds.), Restructuring Schooling: Learning from Ongoing Efforts (pp. 114–142). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
26.
HallingerP. and MurphyJ.. 1985. “Assessing the Instructional Management Behavior of Principals.”Elementary School Journal, 86 (2): 217–247.
27.
HaroldB.1997. The Changing Role of the Principal: A New Zealand Perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
28.
HartA. W. and BredesonP. V.1996. The Principalship: A Theory of Professional Learning and Practice.New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
HessG. A. and EastonJ. Q.1991, April. Who 50 Making What Decisions? Monitoring Authority Shifts in Chicago School Reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
30.
HillD. A.1993. The Realities of the Principalship.Castleton, VT: Castleton State College. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 364 972)
31.
HoustonP.1998, June. “The ABC's of Administrative Shortages.”Education Week, 44.
32.
KearneyC. P. and ArnoldM. L.1994. “Market Driven Schools and Educational Choices.”Theory Into Practice, 33 (2): 112–117.
33.
KellerB.1998, November 11. “Principal Matters.”Education Week, 25–27.
34.
MacphersonR. J. S.1989. “Radical Administrative Reforms in New Zealand Education: The Implications of the Picot Report for Institutional Managers.”Journal of Educational Administration, 27 (1): 29–44.
35.
MacPhersonR. B. and CrowsonR. L.. 1992, November. Creating Schools That Work Under Chicago Reform: The Adaptations of Building Principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Minneapolis.
36.
MadsenJ.1997, March. “Leadership in Decentralized Schools.”Journal of School Leadership, 7: 111–137.
37.
MarshallC. and RossmanG. B.. 1989. Designing Qualitative Research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
MartinW. and WillowerD.. 1981. “The Managerial Behavior of High School Principals.”Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1): 69–90.
39.
MaykutP. and MorehouseR.1994. Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide.Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press.
40.
MerriamS. B.1988. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
MurphyJ.1992. The Landscape of Leadership Preparation: Reframing the Education of School Administrators.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
42.
MurphyJ.1994. “Transformational Change and the Evolving Role of the Principal: Early Empirical Evidence.” In J. Murphy and K. S. Louis (Eds.), Reshaping the Principalship: Insights from Transformational Reform Efforts (pp. 20–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
43.
MuseI. and ThomasG. J.. 1991. “The Rural Principal: Select the Best.”Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 4 (3): 32–37.
44.
New England School Development Council.1988. Administrative Shortages in New England: The Evidence, the Causes, the Recommendations.Sudbury, MA: Author.
PetersenK.1982. “Making Sense of Principals’ Work.”The Australian Administrator, 3 (3): 1–4.
47.
PetersenK. D. and WarrenV. W.. 1994. Changes in School Governance and Principals’ Roles: Changing Jurisdictions, New Power Dynamics, and Conflict in Restructured Schools. In MurphyJ. & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Reshaping the Principalship: Insights from Transformational Change Efforts (pp. 219–236). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
PrestineN.1991. “Shared Decision Making in Restructuring Essential Schools: The Role of the Principal.”Planning and Changing, 22 (3/4): 160–111.
49.
ReitzugU. C.1994. “A Case Study of Empowering Principal Behavior.”American Educational Research Journal, 31 (2): 283–307.
50.
RhinehartJ. S., ShortP., ShortR. J. and EckleyM.. 1998, December. “Teacher Empowerment and Principal Leadership: Understanding the Influence Process.”Education Administration Quarterly, 34: 630–649.
51.
RobertsonP. J., WohlstetterP. and MohrmanA. S.. 1995. “Generating Curriculum and Instructional Innovations through School-based Management.”Educational Administration Quarterly, 31 (3): 315–404.
52.
ShortP. and GreerJ.. 1993. Restructuring Schools through Empowerment. In MurphyJ. & HallingerP. (Eds.), Restructuring Schooling: Learning from Ongoing Efforts (pp. 165–187). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
53.
SmithJ. O. and ColonR. J.. 1998, January. “Legal Responsibilities Toward Students with Disabilities: What Every Administrator Should Know.”NASSP Bulletin, 40–53.
54.
StrozykE.1995. Superintendent/Principal Retirement Statistics for School Year 1994-95. Unpublished data. Olympia, WA: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
55.
WeindlingD.1992. “Marathon Running on a Sand Dune: The Changing Role of the Headteacher in England and Wales.”Journal of Educational Administration, 30 (3): 63–76.
56.
WeissC. H. and CamboneJ.. 1994. “Principals, Shared Decision Making, and School Reform.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16 (3): 287–301.
57.
WhanL. D. and ThomasA. R.. 1996. “The Principalship and Stress in the Workplace: An Observational and Physiological Study.”Journal of School Leadership, 6: 444–465.
58.
WhitakerK. S.1995. “Principal Burnout: Implications for Professional Development.”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9 (3): 287–296.
59.
WhitakerK. S.1996. “Exploring Causes of Principal Burnout.”Journal of Educational Administration, 34 (1): 60–71.
60.
WilliamsB. T. and KatsiyannisA.. 1998, January. “The 1997 IDEA Amendments: Implications for School Principals.”NASSP Bulletin, 12–17.
61.
WulffK.1996, January. The Changing Role of the Principal. Project Report, Executive Summary. Association of Washington School Principals and University of Washington.