BirdR. M., EbelR. D. and WallichC. I.. 1995. Decentralization of the Socialist State: Intergovernmental Finance in Transition Economies.Washington, DC: The World Bank.
2.
BerdahlR. O. and MillettJ. D.. 1991. “Autonomy and Accountability in US Higher Education.” In NeaveG. and van VughtF. A. (Eds.), Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe (pp. 215–238). Oxford: Pergamon.
3.
CummingsW. K.1997. “Patterns of Modern Education.” In W. K. Cummings and N. F. McGinn (Eds.), International Handbook of Education and Development: Preparing Schools, Students and Nations for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 63–85). Oxford: Pergamon.
4.
DneprovE. D.1996. Shkol'naia Reforma mezhdu “Vchera” i “Zavtra” (School Reform between “Yesterday” and “Tomorrow”). Moscow: Federal Institute of Educational Planning of the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and the Russian Academy of Education.
5.
JohnstoneD. B.1995, October. “Higher Education Austerity in Comparative Perspective: A Discussion Paper,” paper presented at the Northeast and Midwest Regional conference of the Comparative and International Education Society. Niagara Falls, NY.
6.
LernerP.1993. “Profitability of Education? Why Not!”Russian Education and Society, 35(1):51–55.
7.
MaassenP. and van VughtF. A.. 1994. “Alternative Models of Governmental Steering in Higher Education.” In GoedegebuureL. and van VughtF. A. (Eds.), Comparative Policy Studies in Higher Education (pp. 35–63). Utrecht: Lemma.
8.
McGuinnessA. C.Jr.1995. “The Changing Relationships between the States and Universities in the United States,” Higher Education Management, 7(3):263–279.
9.
NeaveG. and van VughtF. A. (Eds.). 1994. Government and Higher Education Relationships A cross Three Continents: The Winds of Change.Oxford: Pergamon.
10.
NeaveG. and van VughtF. A.. 1991. “Conclusion.” In NeaveG. and van VughtF. A. (Eds.), Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe (pp. 239–255). Oxford: Pergamon.
11.
Novosibirsk State Technical University.1996. Newsletter—Inform, 4:7–11.
12.
OECD.1998. OECD Reviews of National Education Policies: Russian Federation.Paris: OECD.
13.
OECD.1995. OECD Economic Surveys: The Russian Federation 1995.Paris: OECD.
14.
OgorodnikovaO.1998, April 7. “Plany Ministerstva—Nashi Plany?” (Are the Ministry's Plans Our Plans?) Uchitel'skaia Gazeta, 13:2.
15.
Resolution of the 4th Congress of the Russian Rectors’ Union.1996. “Sostoianie i Perspektivy Vysshego Obrazovania v Rossii” (State of Affairs and Prospects for Higher Education in Russia). Poisk, 19:3.
16.
The Russian Federation Law on Higher and Post-Graduate Professional Education.1996, August 29. Rossiiskaia Gazeta, 4–6.
17.
The Russian Federation Law on Education. 1992. Vedomosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 30:2221–2258.
18.
The Russian Federation State Committee on Statistics.1997. Sotsial ‘noe Polozhenie i Uroven’ Zhizni Naselenia Rossii (Social Status and Living Standards of the Population in Russia). Moscow: Author.
19.
The Russian Federation State Committee on Statistics.1996. Annual Statistical Yearbook.Moscow: Logos.
20.
SchleiferA. and TreismanD.. 1998. The Economics and Politics of Transition to an Open Market Economy: Russia.Paris: OECD.
21.
van VughtF. A. (Ed.). 1989. Governmental Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education.London: Jessica Kingsley.
22.
World Bank.1996. From Plan to Market: World Development Report 1996.New York: Oxford University Press.