ArgotM., BullockA., and ThomasH. (1992). The impact of local management on schools: A source book.School of Education, The University of Birmingham.
2.
CaldwellB. J. (1990). Educational reform through school-site management: An international perspective on restructuring in education. In BacharachS. B. (Ed.), Advances in research and theories of school management and educational policy (Vol. 1, pp. 303–333). Greenwick, CT: JAI Press.
3.
CaldwellB. J. and SpinksJ. (1988). The self-managing school.Lewes: Falmer Press.
4.
CaldwellB. J. and SpinksJ. M. (1992). Leading the self-managing school.Lewes: Falmer Press.
5.
ChanM. T., ChingY. C., and ChengY. C.(in press). Teacher participation in decision making: The case of Hong Kong SMI schools. Education Journal.
6.
ChengY. C. (1992). A preliminary study of school management initiative: Responses to induction and implementation of management reforms. Educational Research Journal, 7, 21–22.
7.
ChengY. C. (1993). The theory and characteristics of school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management, 7(6), 6–17.
8.
ChengY. C. (1994). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for education quality and school development. Keynote speech presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Melbourne, Australia.
9.
ChengY. C. (1995). School effectiveness and improvement in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and mainland China. In CreemersB. H. M. and OsingaN. (Eds.), ICSEI Country Reports (pp. 11–20). Netherlands: Gemeenschappeli jk Centrum voor Onderwijsbegeleiding in Friesland, Leeuwarden.
10.
ChengY. C. (1996a). School Effectiveness and School-based Management: A Mechanism for Development, London, U.K.: The Falmer Press, pp. 1–203.
11.
ChengY.C. (1996b). The Pursuit of School Effectiveness: Research, Management and Policy, Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, pp. 1–244.
12.
ChengY.C. (1997). A Framework of Indicators of Education Quality in Hong Kong Primary Schools: Development and Application.Eugene, OR: ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) (no. EA 028358). Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (USA).
13.
CheungW. M. and ChengY. C. (1996). A multi-level framework for self management in school. International Journal of Educational Management, 10(1), 17–29.
14.
DavidJ. L. (1989). Synthesis of research on school-based management. Educational Leadership, 46(8), 45–53.
15.
DimmockC. (Ed.). (1993). School-based management and school effectiveness.London: Routledge.
16.
Education Commission (1984-1992). Reports No. 1-5.Hong Kong: Government Printer.
17.
Education Commission (1996). Quality School Education: Consultation Document for Education Commission report No. 7.Hong Kong Education Commission.
18.
Education and Manpower Branch and Education Department (1991). The School Management Initiative.Hong Kong: Government Printer.
19.
FullanM. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). London: Cassell.
20.
JenniR.W. (1991). Application of the School Based Management Process Development Model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 136–151.
21.
MalenB., OgawaR. T. and KranzJ. (1990). What do we know about school-based management? A case study of the literature—A call for research. In CluneW.H. and WitteJ.F. (Eds.) Choice and control in American education, vol. 2: The practice of choice decentralization and school restructuring, chapter 8.London: the Falmer Press.
22.
MitchellD. (1991). Monitoring today's schools: a scorecard after 18 months. New Zealand Journal of Educational Administration, 6, 48–61.
23.
MohrmanS. A., Wohlstetter, P., and Associates. (Eds.) (1994). School-based management: Organizing for high performance.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
MurphyJ. and BeckL. G. (1995). School-based Management as School Reform: Taking Stock.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25.
SMI Advisory Committee (1995). Minutes of the 11th Meeting of the Advisory Committee on the School Management Initiative, 19 December, 1995, Hong Kong: SMI Advisory Committee. (The Report of Task Group on Review of SMI Implementation, November, 1995).
26.
Task Group of Evaluation of the SMI Scheme (1993). The First Survey of Evaluation of Phase 1 of the SMI Scheme, Hong Kong: The SMI Advisory Committee.
27.
Task Group of Evaluation of the SMI Scheme (1994). The Second Survey of Evaluation of Phase 1 of the SMI Scheme, Hong Kong: The SMI Advisory Committee.
28.
Task Group of Evaluation of the SMI Scheme (1995). The Evaluation of Phase 3 of the SMI Scheme, Hong Kong: The SMI Advisory Committee.
29.
Task Group of Evaluation of the SMI Scheme (1997). The Study of Good Practices and Noticeable Effects of the SMI Implementation in Some Schools, Hong Kong: The SMI Advisory Committee.