CarelliR.1997. “Prop 209 Survives Justices’ Scrutiny,” The Boston Globe (November 4) 1, 18.
5.
FarrelJ. A.1997. “Settlement Keeps Bias Case Out of High Court,” The Boston Globe (November 22) 1, 13.
6.
Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co., 424 U.S. 747 (1976).
7.
Hopwood v. State of Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (5th Cir. 1996).
8.
Hopwood v. State of Texas, 84 F.3d 720 (5th Cir. 1996).
9.
Jackson Education Association v. Board of Education, No. 77-01148CZ (Jackson County Circuit Court, 1979).
10.
JonesS. L.1997. “High Court Lets Prop. 209 Stand,” The San Diego Union-Tribune (November 4) A-1, A–13.
11.
Miller v. Johnson, 115 S.ct. 713 (1995).
12.
Piscataway Township Board of Education v. Taxman, No. 96-679.
13.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 98 S.ct. 2733 (1978).
14.
RossowL. F. and ParkinsonJ. R.. 1997. “Supreme Court Preview: The Court Tackles Reverse Discrimination in Piscataway Township Board of Education v. Taxman,” School Law Reporter, 39:105–107.
15.
Taxman v. Board of Education of Township of Piscataway, 91 F.3d 1547 (3rd Cir. 1996).
16.
United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh v. Carey, 97 S.ct. 996 (1977) (Brennan, J. concurring).
17.
United Steelworkers v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (1979).
18.
WalshM.1997a. “Layoff Case Is Personal in N.J. School,” Education Week (October 8) 1, 20–21.
19.
WalshM.1997b. “N.J. District Settles Case on Race Bias,” Education Week (November 26) 1, 22.
20.
Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 106 S.Ct. 1842 (1986).]