CooperH.1990. “Meta-Analysis and the Integrative Research Review. In HendrickC. and ClarkM. S., eds., Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
GallM. D., BorgW.R. and GallJ. P.. 1996. Educational Research (6th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
3.
GlassG. V.1976. “Primary, Secondary and Meta-Analysis,” Educational Researcher, 5(1):3–8.
4.
GlassG. V. and SmithM. L.. 1979. “Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship of Class Size and Achievement,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(1):2–16.
5.
HedgesL. V. and BeckerB. J.. 1986. “Statistical Methods in the Meta-Analysis of Research on Gender Differences,” in HydeJ. S. and LinnM. C., eds., The Psychology of Gender: Advances through Meta-Analysis, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
HedgesL. V. and OlkinI.. 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.New York: Academic Press.
7.
HedgesL. V. and OlkinI.. 1980. “Vote Counting Methods in Research Synthesis,” Psychological Bulletin, 88(3):359–369.
8.
HittlemanD. R. and SimonA. J.. 1997. Interpreting Educational Research: An Introduction for Consumers of ResearchColumbus, OH: Merrill.
9.
HunterJ. E. and SchmidtF. L.. 1990. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
HydeS. and HydeM. C.. 1986. The Psychology of Gender: Advances through Meta-Analysis.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
LipseyM. W. and WilsonD. B.. 1993. “The Efficacy of Psychological, Educational, and Behavioral Treatment: Confirmation from Meta-Analysis,” American Psychologists, 48(12)1181-1209.
12.
MannC.1994. “Can Meta-Analysis Make Policy”? Science, 266(11):960–963.
13.
McGawB.1988. “Meta-Analysis,” in Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook, KeevesJ. P., ed., New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
14.
McNamaraJ. F.1994. Surveys and Experiments in Education Research.Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.
15.
MostellerF.1997. “Smaller Classes Do Make a Difference in the Early Grades: Evidence from Tennessee's Project STAR Sends School Leaders a Strong Message,” The Harvard Educational Letter, 13(4):5–7
16.
MostellerF.1995. “The Tennessee Study of Class Size in the Early School Grades,” Future of Children, 5(2): 113–127.
17.
MostellerF., LightR. J. and SachsJ. A.. 1996. “Sustained Inquiry in Education: Lessons from Skill Grouping and Class Size,” Harvard Educational Review, 66(4):797–842.
18.
ThompsonD. P., McNamaraJ. F. and HoyleJ. R.. 1997. “Job Satisfaction in Educational Organizations: A Synthesis of Research Findings,” Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(1):7–37.