AppleM.1983. “Curriculum in the Year 2000: Tensions and Possibilities,” Phi Delta Kappan, 64(5):321–326.
2.
AyersT. D.1987. “Stakeholders as Partners in Evaluation: A Stakeholder-Collaborative Approach,” Evaluation and Program Planning, 10(3):263–271.
3.
BogdanR. and BiklenS.. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BrandtR. S. (ed.). 1979. Partners, Parents and Schools.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5.
BrykA. S. (ed.). 1983. Stakeholder-Based Evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
CarsonA. S.1984. “Control of the Curriculum: A Case for Teachers,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1):19–28.
7.
CarsonR. B. and FriesenJ. W.. 1978. Teacher Participation: A Second Look.Washington, DC: University Press of America.
8.
DollR. C.1992. Curriculum Improvement: Decision Making and Process.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
EtheridgeC. P., ValeskyT. and HallM. L.. 1993. “Restructuring Schools through Shared Decision Making: Uprooting the Factory Paradigm. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Los Angeles, CA.
10.
FitzgibbonsR. E.1981. Making Educational Decisions: An Introduction to Philosophy of Education.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11.
GilmoreP. and GlatthornA. A., (eds.). 1982. Children In and Out of School: Ethnography and Education.Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
12.
GoetzJ. and LeCompteM.. 1984. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Settings.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
GoldN.1981. The Stakeholder Process in Educational Program Evaluation.Washington. DC: National Institute of Education.
14.
GoldN.1983. “Stakeholders and Program Evaluation: Characterizations and Reflections,” in Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, BrykA. S. (ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 63–72.
15.
GreeneJ. C.1987. “Stakeholder Participation in Evaluation Design: Is It Worth the Effort?”Evaluation and Program Planning, 10(4):379–394.
16.
GreeneJ. C.1988. “Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation,” Evaluation Review, 12(4):91–116.
17.
GreeneJ. C.1992. “Stakeholder Interests in Program Evaluation: How Well Are They Served by Collaborative and Interpretive Perspectives? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
18.
GrundyS.1987. Curriculum: Product or Praxis.Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
19.
HareR. M.1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point.Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
20.
HouseE. R.1974. The Politics of Educational Innovation.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
21.
HansenJ. F.1979. Sociocultural Perspectives on Human Learning: An Introduction to Educational Anthropology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22.
JohnsonM and PajaresF.. 1996. “When Shared Decision Making Works: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study,” American Educational Research Journal, 33(3):599–627.
23.
KimpstonR. D. and RogersK. B.. 1988. “Predispositions, Participatory Roles and Perceptions of Teachers, Principals and Community Members in a Collaborative Curriculum Planning Process,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(4):351–367.
24.
LincolnY. and GubaE.. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
LortieD. C.1975. Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
MarshD., DayC., HannayL. and McCutcheonG.. 1990. Reconceptualizing School-Based Curriculum Development.New York: The Falmer Press.
27.
McCutcheonG.1979. “A Conflict of Interests,” in The Educational Imagination, EisnerE. (ed.). New York: Macmillan, pp. 245–260.
28.
McCutcheonG.1982. “What in the World Is Curriculum Theory?”Theory into Practice, 21(1):18–22.
29.
McCutcheonG.1995. Developing the Curriculum: Solo and Group Deliberation.White Plains, NY: Longman.
30.
McCutcheonG. and HannayL.. 1983. “The Deliberative Process in Curriculum Development,” Paper presented at the the Bergamo Curriculum Conference, Dayton, OH.
31.
McNeilJ.1996. Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction.New York: Harper Collins.
32.
MitchellJ. C.1984. “Producing Data: Case Studies,” in Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct, EllenR. F. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, pp. 237–241.
33.
MohrmanA. M.Jr., CookeR.A. and MohrmanS. A.. 1972. “Participation in Decision Making: A Multidimensional Perspective,” Educational Administration Quarterly, 14(1):13–29.
34.
PattonM. Q.1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd Ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
PratteR.1979. Pluralism in Education: Conflict, Clarity, and Commitment.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
36.
PratteR.1988. The Civic Imperative: Examining the Need for Civic Education.New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
PratteR.1992. Philosopy of Education: Two Traditions.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
38.
RobertsJ. I. and AkinsanyaS. K (eds.). 1976. Educational Patterns and Cultural Configurations: The Anthropology of Education.New York: David McKay.
39.
SchwabJ.1969. “The Practical: A Language for Curriculum,” School Review, 78: 1–23.
40.
SmithL. M., PruntyJ. P., DwyerD. C. and KleineP. F.. 1987. The Fate of an Innovative School: The History and Present Status of the Kensington School.Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
41.
SparksD. and Loucks-HorsleyS.. 1995. “Five Models of Staff Development for Teachers,” in Contemporary Issues in Curriculum, OrnsteinA. C. and BeharL. S. (eds.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 293–318.
42.
StakeR. E.1983. “Stakeholder Influence in the Evaluation of Cities-in-Schools,” in Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, BrykA. S. (ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 15–30.
43.
StakeR. E.1988. “Case Study Methods in Educational Reseach: Seeking Sweet Water,” in Complementary Methods for Research in Education, JaegerR. M. (ed.). Washington, DC: AERA, pp. 253–274.
44.
StraussA.1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists.New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
TannerD. and TannerL.. 1995. Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
46.
TaylorC.1977. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man,” in Understanding and Social Inquiry, DallmayrF. R. and McCarthyT. A., (eds.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, pp. 24–37.
47.
VallanceE.1982. “The Practical Uses of Curriculum Theory,” in Theory into Practice, 21(1):4–10.
48.
WilsonJ.1967. Language and the Pursuit of Truth.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
WillisP.1977. Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs.New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
WolcottH. F.1973. The Man in the Principal's Office: An Ethnography.Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
51.
YoungJ. H.1989. “Teacher Interest in Curriculum Committees: What Factors Are Involved?Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4):363–376.
52.
JungB.1991. “Curriculum Decision Making and Stakeholder Interests: A Case Study,” Ph.D. diss., The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
53.
JungB.1992. “Curriculum Development: Teacher Empowering and Professional,” in Teacher Education Yearbook 1: Diversity and Teaching, O'HairM. and OdellS. (eds.). Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators, pp. 285–298.