AirasianP.1987. “The Consequences of High School Graduation Testing Programs,”NASSP Bulletin, 71(496): 54–68.
2.
ArchbaldD., and NewmannF.1988. Beyond Standardized Testing: Assessing Authentic Academic Achievement in the Secondary School.Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
3.
ArchbaldD.1994. “Reflections on the Design and Purposes of State Curriculum Guides: A Comparison of Mathematics and Social Studies Guides from Four States,”South Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for Policy Research in Education, Eagleton Institute for Public Policy.
4.
ArchbaldD., and PorterA.1994. “Curriculum Control and Teachers’ Perceptions of Autonomy and Satisfaction,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(1).
5.
BakerE., O'NeilH., and LinnR.“Policy and Validity Prospects for Performance-Based Assessment,”American Psychologist, 48(12): 1210–1218.
6.
BarthR.1990. Improving Schools from Within, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BlankR., and PechmanE.1995. State Curriculum Frameworks in Mathematics and Science: How Are They Changing Across the States?Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
8.
BoyerE.1988. Report Card on School Reform: The Teachers Speak.Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
9.
BrophyJ.1991. “Teaching Social Studies for Understanding and Higher Order Applications,”Elementary School Journal, 90: 351–417.
10.
BrownD.1992. “The Recentralization of School District,”Educational Policy, 6(3): 289–297.
11.
CSDE.1987. Secondary Textbook Review: General Mathematics, Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.
12.
CluneW.1993. “The Best Path to Systemic Educational Policy: Standard/Centralized or Differentiated/Decentralized?”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3): 233–254.
13.
CohenD., and SpillaneJ.1993. “Policy and Practice: The Relations between Governance and Instruction,” inDesigning Coherent Education Policy, FuhrmanS. (Ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
14.
CohenD. K., and BallD. L.1990. “Relations between Policy and Practice: A Commentary,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3): 331–338.
15.
CohenS.1987. “Instructional Alignment: Searching for the Magic Bullet,”Education Researcher, 16(8): 16–20.
16.
CorbettB., and WilsonB.1991. Testing, Reform, and Rebellion, Norwood: Ablex.
17.
Council of Chief State School Officers.1995. State Curriculum Frameworks in Mathematics and Science: How Are They Changing Across States?Washington, D.C.: Author.
18.
CurryB., and TempleT.1992. Curriculum Frameworks for Systemic Reform, Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19.
Darling-HammondL.1989. “Accountability for Professional Practice,”Teachers College Record, 91: 59–80.
20.
Darling-HammondL.1991. “The Implications of Testing Policy for Quality and Equality,”Phi Delta Kappan, 73(3): 220–225.
21.
DavidJ. L.1989. “Synthesis of Research on School-Based Management,”Educational Leadership, 46: 45–53.
22.
DempsterF.1993. “Exposing our Students to Less Should Help Them Learn More,”Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6): 433–437.
23.
DenzinN., and LincolnY. (Eds.). 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
24.
EisnerE.1987. “Why the Textbook Influences Curriculum,”Curriculum Review, 26: 11–13.
25.
ElliottD., and WoodwardE. (Eds.). 1990. “Textbooks and Schooling in the United States,”89th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
EllweinM., and GlassG.1991. “Testing for Competence: Translating Reform Policy into Practice,”Journal of Educational Policy, 5(1): 64–78.
27.
ElmoreR., and Associates. 1990. Restructuring Schools: The Next Generation of Education Reform, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
ElmoreR., AbelmanC., and FuhrmanS.1995. “The New Accountability in State Education Reform: From Process to Performance,” paper prepared for Brookings Institute Conference on Performance-Based Approaches to School Reform.
29.
EimoreR., and SykesG.1992. “Curriculum Policy,”Handbook of Research on Curriculum.New York: Macmillan.
FlodenR., PorterA., AlforL., FreemanD., IrwinS., SchmidtW., and SchwilleJ.1988. Instructional Leadership at the District Level: A Closer Look at Autonomy and Control, 24(2): 96–124.
32.
FrymierJ.1987. “Bureaucracy and the Neutering of Teachers,”Phi Delta Kappan, 69(1): 9–14.
FullanM.1994. “Coordinating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies for Educational Reform,” inThe Governance of Curriculum, ElmoreR., and FuhrmanS. (Eds.), Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
GehrkeN., KnappM., and SirotnikK.1992. “In Search of School Curriculum,” inReview of Research in Education, GrantG. (ed), V 18: 51–110, Washington, DC: AERA.
37.
GoodladJ.1984. A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future.NY: McGraw Hill.
38.
GoodladJ. I., and SuZ.1992. “Organization of the Curriculum,” inHandbook of Research in Curriculum, JacksonP. (Ed.), NY: Macmillan, pp. 327–344.
39.
GrossmanP., and StodoloskyS.1995. “Content as Context: The Role of School Subjects in Secondary School Teaching,”Educational Researcher, 24(8): 5–11.
40.
GuskeyT. (ed.). 1994. High Stakes Performance Assessment: Perspectives on Kentucky's Educational Reform.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
41.
HaertelE.1989. “Student Achievement Tests as Tools of Educational Policy: Practices and Consequences,” inTest Policy and Test Performance: Education, Language, and Culture, GiffordB. R. (Ed.), Boston: Kluwer.
42.
HaladynaT., NolanS., and HaasN.1991. “Raising Standardized Achievement Test Scores and the Origins of Test Score Pollution,”Educational Researcher, 20(5): 2–8.
43.
HermanJ., and GolanS.1993. “The Effects of Standardized Testing on Teaching and Schools,”Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 12(4): 20–25, 41.
44.
JacobsonS., and BerneR. (Eds.) 1993. Reforming Education: The Emerging Systemic Approach.Thousand Oaks, C A: Cor
45.
KomoskiK.1990. “Needed: cobson, S. and R. Berne (eds.). 1993. Reforming Education: The Emerging Systemic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA Whole-Curriculum Approach,”Educational Leadership, 47(5): 72–78.
46.
LiebermanA. (Ed.). 1988. Building a Professional Culture in Schools.NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
MalenB., OgawaR. T., and KrantzJ.1990. “What Do We Know about School-Based Management? A Case Study of the Literature,” inChoice and Control in American Education, Vol. 2: The Practice of Choice, Decentralization and School Restructuring, CluneW. H., and WitteJ. F. (Eds.), Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
48.
MarburgerC.1985. One School at a Time: School-Based Management, A Process of Change.Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
49.
MarshD., and RowanB.1988. “State-Initiated Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Reform in Secondary Schools,” unpublished manuscript. Prepared for the National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
50.
McDonaldJ., SmithS., TurnerD., FinneyM., and BartonE.1993. Graduation by Exhibition: Assessing Genuine Achievement, Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
51.
McNeilL.1987. “The Politics of Texas School Reform,” inThe Politics of Excellence and Choice in Education: 1987 Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association, BoydW., and KerchnerC. (Eds.), NY: Falmer Press.
52.
MilesM., and HubermanA.1994. “Data Managements and Analysis Methods,” inHandbook of Qualitative Research, DenzinN., and LincolnY. (Eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
53.
MitmanA., MergendollerJ., and ClairG. St.1987. “The Role of Textbooks in Middle Grades Science Teaching,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
54.
MoroneJ. A.1990. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government, NY: Basic Books.
55.
National Center on Educational Standards and Testing.1992. Raising Standards for American Education, Washington, DC: Author.
56.
National Commission on Excellence in Education.1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative of Educational Reform.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
57.
NCTPP.1990. From Gatekeep to Gateway: Transforming Testing in America. Report of the National Commission on Testing and Public Policy. Boston College, Boston, MA.
58.
NewmannF.1988. “Can Depth Replace Coverage in the High School Curriculum?”Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5): 345–349.
59.
NolenS., and HaladynaT.1992. “Uses and Abuses of Achievement Test Scores,”Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 11(2): 9–15.
60.
OERI1994. “Who's in Charge,”Education Research Report, Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
61.
OTA1987. State Educational Testing Practices.Washington, DC: Congressional Office of Technology Assessment.
62.
OTA1992. Testing in American Schools: Asking the Right Questions, Washington, DC: Congressional Office of Technology Assessment.
63.
OakesJ.1987. Improving Inner-City Schools: Current Directions in Urban District Reform.Rutgers University: Center for Policy Research in Education, Eagle Institute of Politics.
64.
O'NeilJ.1991. “Drive for National Standards Picking Up Steam,”Educational Leadership, 48(5): 4–8.
65.
PetersonK., MurphyJ., and HallingerP.1987. “Superintendents’ Perceptions of the Control and Coordination of the Technical Core in Effective School Districts,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(1): 79–95.
66.
PetersonK.1989. Secondary Principals and Instructional Leadership: Complexities in a Diverse Role, Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools.
67.
PophamJ.1987. “The Merits of Measurement-Driven Instruction,”Phi Delta Kappan, 68(9): 679–682.
68.
PorterA.1989. “A Curriculum Out of Balance: The Case of Elementary School Mathematics,”Educational Researcher, 18(5).
69.
PorterA., ArchbaldD., and TyreeA.1990. “Reforming the Curriculum: Will Empowerment Strategies Replace Control?” inPolitics of Education Yearbook, FuhrmanS., and MalenB. (Eds.), NY: Falmer Press, pp. 11–36.
70.
PorterA., KirstM., OstoffE., SmithsonJ., and SchneiderS.1993. “Reform Up Close: An Analysis of High School Mathematics and Science Classrooms,” final report to the National Science Foundation from Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
71.
PorterA., SmithsonJ., and OstoffE.1994. “Standard Setting as a Strategy in Upgrading High School Mathematics and Science,” inThe Governance of Curriculum, ElmoreR., and FuhrmanS., (Eds.) Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
72.
PowellA. G., FarrarE., and CohenD. K.1985. The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
73.
RogersV.1988. “School Texts: The Outlook of Teachers,”Education Week, Aug. 3, p. 3.
74.
RosenholzS. J.1987. “Education Reform Strategies: Will They Increase Teacher Commitment?”American Journal of Education, 95: 534–562.
75.
RottenbergC, and SmithM. L.1990. “Unintended Effects of External Testing in Elementary Schools,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting, American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
76.
RowanB.1990. “Commitment and Control: Alternative Strategies for the Organizational Design of Schools,” inReview of Research in Education, CazdenC. (Ed.), Vol. 16, Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
77.
SarasonS.1990. The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
78.
SchalockD., FieldingG., SchalockM., EricksonJ., and BrottM.1985. “Integrating Teaching and Testing with Program Management,”Educational Leadership, 43(2): 55–60.
79.
SeklakM. W., WheelerC. W., PullinD. C., and CusickP. A.1986. Selling Students Short: Classroom Bargains and Academic Reform in the American High School.New York, NY: Teachers College Press (ED 276 149).
80.
ShaverJ. P. (Ed.). 1991. Handbook of Research on Social Studies Teaching and Learning.NY: Macmillan.
81.
ShutesR.1981. “How to Control Your Curriculum,”American School Board Journal, 168(8): 21–24.
82.
SizerT. R.1992. Horace's School: Redesigning the American High School, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
83.
SmithM., and O'DayJ.1991. “Systemic School Reform,” inThe Politics of Curriculum and Testing, FuhrmanS., and MalenB. (Eds.), 1990 Politics of Education Yearbook. New York: Falmer Press.
84.
StecherB.1992. Describing Secondary Curriculum in Mathematics and Science: Current Status and Future Indicators.Santa Monica: Rand.
85.
StevensonR.1987. “Autonomy and Support: The Dual Needs of Urban High Schools,”Urban Education, 22(3): 366–386.
86.
StodoloskyS., StalkS., and GlaessnerB.1991. “Students’ Views about Learning Math and Social Studies,”American Educational Research Journal, 28: 89–116.
87.
ThorntonS. J.1988. “Curriculum and Consonance in United States History Classroom,”Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3: 308–320.
88.
TyeB. B.1985. Multiple Realities: A Study of Thirteen American High Schools, Lannam MD: University Press of America.
89.
TyreeA.1993. “Examining the Evidence: Have States Reduced Local Control of Curriculum?”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(1): 34–50.
90.
Tyson-BernsteinH.1988. A Conspiracy of Good Intentions: America's Textbook Fiasco.Washington, DC: The Council for Basic Education.
91.
ValenciaS., HiebertE., and AfflerbachP.1994. Authentic Reading Assessment; Practices and Possibilities, Newark DE: International Reading Association.
92.
WeilerH.1979. “Comparative Perspective on Educational Decentralization: An Exercise in Contradiction?”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12: 433–448.
93.
WilsonS. M., and WineburgS. S.1988. “Peering at History from Different Lenses: The Role of Disciplinary Perspectives in the Teaching of American History,”Teachers’ College Record, 89: 525–539.
94.
WinfieldL.1990. “School Competency Testing Reforms and Student Achievement: Exploring a National Perspective,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(2): 157–173.
95.
WiseA. E.1988. “The Two Conflicting Trends in School Reform: Legislated Learning Revisited,”Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5): 328–332.
96.
WoodwardA., and ElliottD.1990. “Textbook Use and Teacher Professionalism,” inTextbooks and Schooling in the United States, ElliottD., and WoodwardA. (Eds.), 89th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.