AmslerM., and MulhollandL.1992. “Charter Schools,”Policy Brief 19, Far West Laboratory.
2.
Barksdale-LaddM. A.1994. “Teacher Enpowerment and Literacy Instruction in Three Professional Development Schools,”Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2): 104.
3.
BerryB., and GinsbergR.1990. “Creating Lead Teachers: From Policy to Implementation,”KAPPAN, p. 617, (April).
4.
BeyerL. E.1989. Preparing Teachers as Professionals.New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
BierleinL.1995. “Charter Schools: A New Approach to Public Education,”NASSP Bulletin, 79(572): 12–20.
6.
BierleinL.1995. Charter Schools: A Means to Enhance Louisiana's Public Education System, Paper presented for the Council for a Better Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA.
7.
BorgW. R., and GallM. D.1989. Educational Research.White Plains, NY: Longman Press.
8.
BroudyH.1956. “Teaching—Craft or Profession,”The Educational Forum, 20: 175–184.
9.
BrownS.1995. “On Whose Authority?”The American School Board Journal, p. 29, (January).
10.
BuddeR.1988. Education by Charter: Restructuring School Districts.St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
BW Associates. 1994. Making Charters Work (Issue Brief No. 1).Berkeley, CA: Eric Premack.
12.
The California Professional Growth Manual.1990. Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Sacramento, CA.
13.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.1986. A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the Twenty-First Century, (Report of the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession), NY: CFEE.
14.
ChubbJ. E.1988. “Why the Current Wave of School Reform Will Fail,”The Public Interest, 90: 28–49.
15.
ChubbJ. E., and MoeT. M.1990. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute.
16.
CorriganD. C.1994. “Creating Conditions for Professional Practice: Education's Unfinished Agenda,”Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1).
17.
CovertJ. R.1975. “Second Thoughts about the Professionalization of Teachers,”The Educational Forum, (January).
18.
Darling-HammondL., and McLaughlinM.1995. “Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform,”KAPPAN, p. 597, (April).
19.
DeweyJ.1904. “The Relation of Theory to Practice in Education,”3rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 10.
20.
DiandaM. R., and CorwinR. G.1993. An Early Look at Charter Schools in California, Southwest Regional Laboratory, (April).
21.
DiandaM. R., and CorwinR. G.1994. Vision and Reality: A First-Year Look at California's Charter Schools.Los Alamitos, C A: Southwest Regional Education Laboratory.
22.
EiseleC.1990. “Too Bright to Be a Teacher,”KAPPAN, p. 556, (April).
23.
EtzioniA.1969. The Semi-Professions and Their Organization.NY: The Free Press.
24.
1992. Far West Focus.Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
25.
GreenwoodE.1957. “Attributes of a Profession,”Social Work, 2: 44–55.
26.
GeigerK.1995. “Commentary,”Education Week, p. 17, (April).
27.
GoodladJ.1994. “The National Network for Educational Renewal,”KAPPAN, p. 632, (April).
28.
GoodladJ.1990. Teachers for Our Nation's Schools.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
29.
Holmes Group.1990. Tomorrow's Schools: Principles for the Design of Professional Development Schools, East Lansing, MI: Author (RTIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 328 533).
30.
JohnsonT.1972. Professions and Power.London: MacMillan.
31.
KolderieT.1987. “Education That Works: The Right Role for Business,”Harvard Business Review, 5: 57, (September/October).
32.
KolderieT.1995. The Charter Idea in the 1995 Legislative Sessions, St. Paul, MN: Center for Policy Studies, (February).
33.
LeitmanR., BinnsK., and DuffettA.1995. The American Teacher: 1984–1995.New York, NY: Metlife.
34.
LiebermanN.1986. Beyond Public Education.New York, NY: Praeger Press.
35.
LiebermanM.1956. Education as a Profession.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
36.
LiebermanM.1980. The Future of Public Education.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
LortieD. C.1975. Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
McDanielT.1982. The Teacher's Profession.Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
39.
McLaughlinJ.1995. “The “P” Word and Public Education,”The Education Investor, 3(6): 1–2.
40.
MoralesP.1995. Principal, Peabody Charter School, Santa Barbara, CA: Telephone Interview, (July 13).
41.
MurphyJ.1990. The Educational Reform Movement of the 1980's.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
42.
NathanJ.1995. Charter Public Schools: A Brief History and Preliminary Lessons.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for School Change, (March).
43.
National Educational Association.1952. “Teacher Personnel Practies, 1950–1951: Appointment and Termination of Service,”Research Bulletin, 30: 12–13.
44.
National Education Association, Division of Field Service.1948. “The Yardstick of a Profession,”Institutes on Professions and Public Relations, Washington, D.C.: The Association.
45.
OlsenL.1993. “Choice for the Long Haul,”Education Week, p. 27, (November 17).
46.
PattersonD.1994. California Department of Education Special Projects Division. Unpublished paper.
47.
SempleM.1995. “Charter Schools: A Legal Overview,”School Law in Review 1995.Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association.
48.
ShankerA.1990. “The End of the Traditional Model of Schooling—A Proposal for Using Incentives to Restructure Our Public Schools,”KAPPAN, (January).
49.
ShankerA.1986. Speech to the American Federation of Teachers, (July 10).
1995. Southwest Regional Laboratory Charter School Survey, p. 4, (April).
52.
SoderR.1986. “Professionalizing the Profession,”Occasional Paper No. 4., Institute for the Study of Educational Policy, University of Washington, (June).
53.
StinnettT., and HuggettA.1956. Professional Problems of Teachers.Toronto, Ontario: The MacMillan Company.
54.
SwansonJ.1995. “Systemic Reform in the Professionalism of Educators,”KAPPAN, p. 36, (September).
55.
TalbertJ. A., and McLaughlinM. W.1994. “Teacher Professionalism in Local School Contexts,”American Journal of Education, (February).
56.
UrahnS., and StewardD.1994. Minnesota Charter Schools: A Research Report, St. Paul, MN: Research Department, Minnesota House of Representatives.
57.
U.S. General Accounting Office.1994a. Education Reform: School-Based Management Results in Changes in Instruction and Budgeting, (GAO/HEHS-94–135).Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
58.
U.S. General Accounting Office.1994b. Regulatory Flexibility: What Happens When Schools Are Allowed to Change the Rules? (GAO/HEHS-95–102).Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
59.
U.S. General Accounting Office.1995. Charter Schools: New Model for Public Schools Provides Opportunities and Challenges, (GAO/HEHS-95–42).Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
60.
VollmerH., and MillsD.1966. Professionalization.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
61.
WatkinsT.1995. Education Week, p. 40, (September 6).
62.
WattsG. D., and McClureR. M.1990. “Expanding the Contract to School Renewal,”KAPPAN, p. 765, (June).
63.
WellsA. S., HirshbergD., DatnowA.1994. “A Comparison of Magnet and Charter Schools: The Trade Off between Desegregation and Deregulation,” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
64.
WilenskyH. L.1964. “The Professionalization of Everyone,”The American Journal of Sociology, (September).
65.
WiseA., and LeibrandJ.1993. “Accreditation and the Profession of Teaching,”KAPPAN, (February).
66.
WohlstetterP.1995. “Getting School-Based Management Right: What Works and What Doesn't,”KAPPAN, p. 22, (September).
67.
WohlstetterP., and AndersonL.1994. “What Can U. S. Charter Schools Learn from England's Grant-Maintained Schools?KAPPAN, 75: 486–491.
68.
WohlstetterP., WenningR., and BriggsK. L.1995. “Charter Schools in the United States: The Question of Autonomy,”Educational Policy, 9(4): 331–358.
69.
YelichC.1995. “As Entrepreneurs, Teachers Discover New Independence,”New York Times, (May 31).
70.
ZimmermanJ.1992. Far West Focus, Far West Laboratory, December.