AndersonR. H.1989. “Unanswered Questions about the Effect of Supervision on Teacher Behavior,”Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(4): 291–297.
2.
BrandtR.1996. “Coaching and Collegiality,”Educational Leadership, 53(6): 3.
3.
BlumbergA.1980. Supervisors and Teachers: A Private Cold War, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
4.
BlumbergA., and JonesR. S.1987. “The Teacher's Control Over Supervision,”Educational Leadership, 44: 58–63, May.
5.
GandalM.1996. Making Standards Matter 1996.Washington, D.C.: The American Federation of Teachers.
6.
GoldhammerR.1969. Clinical Supervision: Special Methods for the Supervision of Teachers, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7.
HaziH. M.1989. “Measurement versus Supervisory Judgment: The Case of Sweeney vs. Turlington,”Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(2): 211–229.
8.
HenryT.1996. “Why U. S. Kids Lag in Science: Curriculum May Be Too Broad,”USA Today, DI.
9.
ManattR., and DanielsB.1990. “Relationships Between Principals’ Ratings of Teacher Performance and Student Achievement,”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4: 189–201.
10.
ManattR.1992. “What's Wrong with NCATE?”International Journal of Educational Reform, 1(3): 307–312.
11.
ManattR.1995. When Right is Wrong: Fundamentalists and the Public Schools, Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company, Inc.
12.
ManattR., and PriceD.1994. “Five-Factor Teacher Performance Evaluation for Career Ladder Placement,”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(3): 239–250.
13.
MedleyD. M., and CokerH.1987. “The Accuracy of Principals’ Judgments of Teacher Performance,”Journal of Educational Research, 80(4): 242–247.
14.
NatrielloG.1990. “Intended and Unintended Consequences: Purposes and Effects of Teacher Evaluation,”The New Handbook of Research on Teaching, MillmanJ., and Darling-HammondL., eds., Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
PetersonJ.1996. “Changes in Tenure Rules Proposed in Kansas,”Kansas City Star, C1,4.
16.
PetroneJ.1990. “Teacher Performance Evaluation: A Nationwide Status Report of Type, Content, and Duration of Training for Public School Teachers,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
17.
PostonW., and ManattR.1993. “Principals as Evaluators: Limiting Effects on School Reform,”International Journal of Educational Reform, 2(1): 41–48.
18.
Report: Math, Science Curriculum Lack Focus, Des Moines Register, 5A, October 16, 1996
19.
ScottJ.“Education Stakeholders’ Attitudes toward Race,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Ames, IA: Iowa State University, in progress.
20.
WilcoxJ.1995. “A Comparison of Teachers’, Students’, and Administrators’ Perceptions of Teacher Performance Quality in Selected K-12 Schools,” Unpublished dissertation, Ames, IA: Iown State University.