AbramiP. C.1990. “Validity of Student Ratings of Instruction: What We Know and What We Do Not,”Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2): 219–231.
2.
AleamoniL. M., and YimerM.1973. “An Investigation of the Relationship between Colleague Rating, Student Rating, Research Productivity, and Academic Rank in Rating Instructional Effectiveness,”Journal of Educational Psychology, 64: 274–277.
3.
AleamoniL. M.1987. “Evaluating Instructional Effectiveness Can Be a Rewarding Experience,”Plant Disease.The American Phy-topathological Society, pp. 377–379.
4.
AleamoniL. M.1987a. “Student Rating Myths versus Research Facts,”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1: 111–119.
5.
AleamoniL. M.1987b. “Typical Faculty Concerns about Student Evaluation of Learning,”New Directions for Teaching and Learning, L.AleamoniM., ed., 31: 25–31.
6.
AndersonS. B., BallS., MurphyR. T. and Associates. 1975. Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation.San Francisco: Gossey-Bass.
7.
BraskampL. A., BrandenburyD. C., and OryJ. C.1984. Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness.Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.
8.
CentraG. A.1982. Determining Faculty Effectiveness.San Francisco: Gossey-Bass, p. 17.
9.
FerrareJ. P.1990. Identifying Discriminating Items for Student Feedback to Principals. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
10.
GaggG. G., WilsonR. C.1970. The Teaching Environment: A Study of Optimum Working Conditions for Effective College Teaching.Berkeley Center for Research and Development in Higher Education, p. 29.
GreenA. C.1990. Identification of Valid, Reliable, Discriminating Criteria for Use in Developing Evaluation Instruments for Substitute Teachers. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
13.
GuthrieE. R.1949. “The Evaluation of Teaching,”Educ. Rec.30: 109–115.
14.
GuthrieE. R.1954. “The Evaluation of Teaching: A Progress Report,”University of Washington, Seattle.
15.
HayesJ. R.1971. “Research, Teaching and Faculty Fate,”Science172: 227–230.
16.
HidlebaughE. J.1973. A Model for Developing a Teacher Performance Evaluation System: A Multiple Appraiser Approach. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
17.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation.1988. The Personnel Evaluation Standards.Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
18.
JudkinsM.1987. Identifying Discriminating Items for the Student Evaluation of Teachers. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
19.
LinskyA. S., and StrausM. A.1975. “Student Evaluations, Research Productivity, and Eminence of College Faculty,”Journal of Higher Education, 46(1): 89–102.
20.
LookE.1983. Selecting Criteria for Evaluation of Principals Based upon Item Discrimination Power and Job Situation. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
21.
ManattR. P.1987. “Lessons from a Comprehensive-Performance Appraisal Project,”Educational Leadership, 44(7): 9–13.
22.
ManattR. P.1988. “Teacher Performance Evaluation: A Total Systems Approach,” in Teacher Evaluation: Six Prescriptions for Success, StanleyS. J., and PophamW. J., eds., Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23.
McGrealT. L.1983. Successful Teacher Evaluation.Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24.
MenneJ. W., and TolsmaR. J.1971. “A Discrimination Index for Items in Instruments Using Group Responses,”Journal of Educational Measurement, 8: 5–7.
25.
MillerR. I.1987. Evaluating Faculty for Promotion and Tenure.San Francisco: Gossey-Bass.
26.
MortonR. K.1964. “Evaluating College Teaching,” in College and University Teaching, EstrainH. A., and GoodeD. M., eds., Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown, p. 521.
27.
MurrayH. G.1987. Impact of Student Instructional Ratings on Quality of Teaching in Higher Education.' Paper presented to annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington D.C.
28.
OmotaniL. M.1992. Refining Valid, Reliable and Discriminating Student Feedback Items for Use as One Component of a Total Teacher Performance Evaluation System. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
29.
PariniJ.1995. “Tenure and the Loss of Faculty Talent,”The Chronicle of Higher Education, 12(44): A.40.
30.
ScrivenM.1990. “Teacher Selection,” in The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation, MillmanJ., and Darling-HammondL., eds., Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
31.
ScrivenM.1991. Evaluation Thesaurus, Fourth Edition.Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
32.
SeldinP.1985. Changing Practices in Faculty Evaluation.San Francisco: Gossey-Bass.
StigginsR. J., and DukeD.1988. The Case for Commitment to Teacher Growth: Research on Teacher Evaluation.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
35.
TagomoriH. J., and BishopL. A.1995. “Student Evaluation of Teaching: Flaws in the Instruments,”Thought and Action: The NEA Higher Education Journal, 11(1): 63–78.
36.
VoeksV. W.1962. “Publications and Teaching Effectiveness,”Journal of Higher Education, 33: 212.