AkinJ.1993. “Effects of Site Culture on School Reform,”High School, 1: 29.
2.
AyersW.1991. “Perestroika in Chicago Schools,”Educational Leadership, 48(8): 69–71.
3.
BennettA. L., BrykA. S., EastonJ. Q., KerbowD., LuppescuS., and SebringP. A.1991. Charting Reform: The Teachers’ Perspective.Report on a Survey of Chicago Public School Principals. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
4.
BennettA. L., BrykA. S., EastonJ. Q., KerbowD., LuppescuS., and SebringP. A.1992. Charting Reform: The Principals’ Perspective.Report on a Survey of Chicago Public School Principals. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
5.
BogdanR. C., and BiklenS. K.1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods.New York: Allyn and Bacon.
6.
BolmanL. G., and DealT. E.1984. Modem Approaches to Understanding and Managing Organizations.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BrandtR.1993. “On Restructuring Roles and Relationships: A Conversation with Phil Schlechty,”Educational Leadership, 51(2): 8–12.
8.
BrykA. S., EastonJ. Q., KerbowD., RollowS. G., and SebringP. A.1994. “The State of Chicago School Reform,”Kappan, 76(1): 74–78.
9.
CorbettH. D., and WilsonB.1990. Restructuring Schools.Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
DealT. E., and PetersonK. D.1990. The Principal's Role in Shaping School Culture.Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
12.
EvansR.1993. “The Human Face of Reform,”Educational Leadership, 51(1): 19–23.
13.
FosterW.1986. Paradigms and Promises.Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
14.
FryB. R.1989. Mastering Public Administration.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
15.
FullanM. G., and MilesM. B.1992. “Getting Reform Right: What Works and What Doesn't,”Kappan, 73(10): 744–752.
16.
Fumarolo v. Chicago Board of Education, 566 N.E.2d 1283 (Ill.1990).
17.
HessG. A.1991. School Restructuring, Chicago Style.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
18.
Illinois School Code, Chapter 122, Articles 34 and 34A, et. seq.
19.
LincolnY. S., and GubaE. G.1985. Naturalistic Inquiry.Beverly Hills: SAGE.
20.
MerriamS.1988. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL).1992. Chicago School Reform Study Project.Oakbrook, IL: NCREL.
22.
OwensR. G.1987. Organizational Behavior in Education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
PattonM. Q.1980. Qualitative Evaluation Methods.Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
24.
PughD. S., and HicksonD. J.1990. Writers on Organizations.Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
25.
SarasonS. B.1990. The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
SchlechtyP.1989. Schools for the 21st Century.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
SergiovanniT. J.1987. Educational Governance and Administration.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
SirotnickK. A.1989. “School as the Center of Change,” in Schooling for Tomorrow, SergiovanniT. J., and MooreJ. H., eds., Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
29.
StakeR. E.1988. “Case Studies in Educational Research: Seeking Sweet Water,”Complementary Methods for Research in Education, JaegerR., ed., Washington, DC: AERA. System-wide Educational Reform Goals and Objectives Plan. 1991–1993. Chicago: Chicago Board of Education.
30.
YinR. K.1989. Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.