Alabama State Department of Education.1989. Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program of Alabama: Criteria Manual.Mongomery, AL: Alabama State Department of Education.
2.
BeckL. G., and MurphyJ.1993. Understanding the Principalship: Metaphorical Themes 1920s–1990s.New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
BossertS. T., DwyerD. C., RowanB., and LeeG. V.1982. “The Instructional Management Role of the Principal,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 18: 34–64.
4.
CombsB. T.1991. “Creative Consititutional Reform in Kentucky,”Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28: 367–378.
5.
DukeD. L., and IwanickiE.1992. “Principal Assessment and the Notion of ‘Fit’,”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part I: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN.S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(1): 58–74.
6.
ERS.1985. “Evaluating Administrator Performance,”Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
7.
FullerJ. F.1989. “Decision-Making Patterns of Elementary School Principals and the Improvement of Student Achievement,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
8.
GarrettW. R., and FlaniganJ. L.1991. “Principal Evaluation: A Definitive Process,”Journal of School Leadership, 1(1): 74–86.
9.
GinsbergR., and BerryB.1989. “Influencing Superiors’ Perceptions: The Fudge Factor in Teacher and Principal Evaluation,”Urban Review, 21(1): 15–34.
10.
GinsbergR., and BerryB.1990. “The Folklore of Principal Evaluation,”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3(3): 205–230.
11.
GinsbergR., and ThompsonT.1992. “Dilemmas and Solutions Regarding Principal Evaluation,”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part I: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN. S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(1): 58–74.
12.
GlasmanN. S.1992. “Toward Assessing Test Score-Related Actions of Principals,”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part I: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN. S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(1): 108–123.
13.
GlasmanN. S.1986. “Evaluation-Based Leadership: School Administration in Contemporary Perspective,”Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
14.
HartA. W.1992. “The Social and Organizational Influence of Principals: Evaluating Principals in Context,”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part I: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN. S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(1): 37–57.
15.
HeckR. H., and MarcoulidesG. A.1992. “Principal Assessment: Conceptual Problem, Methodological Problem, or both?”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part I: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN. S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(1): 85–109.
16.
Joint Committee.1988. “The Personnel Evaluation Standards,”Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Kentucky Department of Education.1989. Teacher/Administrator Performance Based Evaluation: Guidelines for Certified Personnel Evaluation.Frankfort, Kentucky.
18.
Kentucky Administrative Regulations (KAR).1992. 704 KAR § 3:345.
LeithwoodK., JantziD., SilinsH., and DartB.1993. “Using the Appraisal of School Leaders as an Instrument for School Restructuring,”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part I: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN. S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(1): 85–109.
25.
MarcoulidesG., and HeckR.1992. “Principal Assessment: Conceptual Problem, Methodological Problem, or Both?” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
26.
MartinW. J., and WillowerD. J.1981. “ The Managerial Behavior of High School Principals,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 17: 69–90.
27.
PetersS., and BagenstosN. T.1988. “State Mandated Principal Evaluation: A Report on Current Practices,” paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
28.
RallisS. F., and GoldringE. B.1992. “Beyond the Individual Assessment of Principals: School-Based Accountability in Dynamic Schools,”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part I: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN. S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(1): 37–57.
29.
Rosev. Council for Better Education, 790 S.W. 2d, 186 (Ky. 1989).
30.
SmithA. T.1992. “Comparison of Self- and Supervisor Ratings of Alabama Principals,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
31.
SmylieM. A., and CrowsonR. L.1992. “Principal Assessment Under Restructured Governance,”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part II: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN. S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(2): 64–84.
32.
SnyderJ., and EbmeierH.1992. “Empirical Linkages Among Principal Behaviors and Intermediate Outcomes: Implications for Principal Evaluation,”New Ways to Assess the Performance of School Principals, Part II: Peabody Journal of Education, GlasmanN. S., and HeckR. H., eds., 68(2): 75–107.
33.
Tennessee State Board of Education.1990. Master Plan for Tennessee Schools: Preparing for the Twentieth Century.Nashville, TN
34.
Thompson v. Board of Education of Henderson County, Ky., 838 S.W. 2d, 390 (Ky. 1992).
35.
YbarraB. C.1992. “Achievement-Based Actions Across the Organization,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.