& Reflective teachers are never satisfied that they have all the answers. By continually seeking new information, they constantly challenge their own practices and assumptions. In the process, new dilemmas surface and teachers initiate a new cycle of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. (Ross et al., 1993, p. 337)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeyerL. E., FeinbergW., PaganoJ. A., and WhitsonJ. A.1989. Preparing Teachers as Professionals: The Role of Educational Studies and Other Liberal Disciplines.New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
BrubacherJ. W., CaseC. W., and ReaganT. G. In press. Becoming a Reflective Educator: How to Build a Culture of Inquiry in the Schools.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
3.
CaseC. W., LanierJ. E., and MiskelC. G.1986. “The Holmes Group Report: Impetus for Gaining Professional Status for Teachers,”Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4): 36–43.
4.
CaseC. W., NorlanderK. A., and ReaganT. G.1993. “Cultural Transformation in an Urban Professional Development Center: Policy Implications for School-University Collaboration,”Educational Policy, 7(1): 40–60.
5.
CliftR. T., HoustonW. R., and PugachM. C., eds. 1990. Encouraging Reflective Practice in Education: An Analysis of Issues and Programs.New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
DeweyJ.1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry.New York: Henry Holt.
7.
GideonseH. D., ed. 1992. Teacher Education Policy: Narratives, Stories and Cases.Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
GoodladJ. I.1988a. The National Network for Educational Renewal: Past, Present and Future. Occasional Paper No. 7, Center for Educational Renewal. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, College of Education.
9.
GoodladJ. I.1988b. “School-University Partnerships for Educational Renewal: Rationale and Concepts.” in School-University Partnerships in Action: Concepts, Cases and Concerns, SirotnikK. A., and GoodladJ. I., eds., New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 3–31.
10.
GoodladJ.I.1991a. Teachers for Our Nation's Schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
GoodladJ. I.1991b. “Why We Need a Complete Redesign of Teacher Education,”Educational Leadership, 49: 4–10.
12.
GoodladJ. I., and FieldS.1993. “Teachers for Renewing Schools,” in Integrating General and Special Education, GoodlandJ. I., and LovittT. C., eds., New York: Macmillan, pp. 229–252.
13.
GoodladJ. I., and SirotnikK. A.1988. “The Future of School-University Partnerships,” in School-University Partnerships in Action: Concepts, Cases, and Concerns, SirotnikK. A., and GoodladJ. I., eds., New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 205–225.
14.
GoodladJ. I., and SoderR.1992. “School-University Partnerships: An Appraisal of an Idea,” Occasional Paper No. 15, Center for Educational Renewal. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
IrwinJ.1987. “What Is a Reflective/Analytic Teacher?” Discussion paper, School of Education, The University of Connecticut (mimeo).
18.
MillerJ., and MartensM.1990. “Hierarchy and Imposition in Collaborative Inquiry: Teacher-Researchers’ Reflections on Recurrent Dilemmas,”Educational Foundations, 4(4): 41–59.
19.
NorlanderK. A., CaseC. W., MeagherJ. A., and ReaganT. G.1992. Teacher Preparation at the University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT: School of Education, The University of Connecticut.
20.
NorlanderK. A., Salamone-ConsoliA., and DeFrancoT.1993. “An Urban Professional Development Center: Implications for University-School Cooperation,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, San Diego, CA, February.
21.
PugachM. C., and PaschS. H.1992. “The Challenge of Creating Urban Professional Development Schools,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April.
22.
ReaganT., CaseK., C. W., and FreibergJ. A.1993. “Reflecting on ‘Reflective Practice’: Implications for Teacher Evaluation,”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6(3): 263–277.
23.
RossD.1990. “Programmatic Structures for the Preparation of Reflective Teachers,” in Encouraging Reflective Practice in Education, CliftR. T., HoustonW. R., and PugachM. C., eds., New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 97–118.
24.
RossD., BondyE., and KyleD.1993. Reflective Teaching for Student Empowerment.New York: Macmillan.
25.
SarasonS. B.1991. The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
SchönD.1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.New York: Basic Books.
27.
SchönD.1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
ShulmanL.1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform,”Harvard Educational Review, 57(1): 1–22.
29.
SirotnikK. A., and GoodladJ. I.1988. “Introduction,” in School-University Partnerships in Action: Concepts, Cases and Concerns, SirotnikK. A., and GoodladJ. I., eds., New York: Teachers College Press, pp. vii–xii.
30.
SoltisJ. F., ed. 1987. Reforming Teacher Education: The Impact of the Holmes Group Report.New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
StoddartT.1993. “The Professional Development Schools: Building Bridges between Cultures,”Educational Policy, 7(1): 5–23.
32.
StrikeK. A.1990. “Is Teaching a Profession: How Would We Know?”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4: 91–117.
33.
SykesG., JudgeH., and DevaneyK.1992. The Needs of Children and the Education of Educators: A Background Paper for Tomorrow's Schools of Education.East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group.
34.
ValliL., ed. 1992. Reflective Teacher Education: Cases and Critiques.Albany: State University Press of New York.
