BensimonE. M.1989. “A Feminist Reinterpretation of Presidents’ Definitions of Leadership,”Peabody Journal of Education, 66(3): 104–123.
2.
ChaseS. E., and BellC. S.1993. “Interpreting the Complexity of Women's Subjectivity,” in Oral History Interviewing: Essays on Interactional Processes, RogersK. L., and McMahanE., eds., Hillsdate, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
CooperJ.1993. “Administrative Women and Their Writing: Reproduction and Resistance in Bureaucracies,” in Women Leading in Education: An Agenda for the 21st Century, DunlapD., and SchmuckP. A., eds., Albany, NY: S.U.N.Y. Press.
4.
FosterW.1986. Paradigms and Promises.New York: Prometheus Books.
5.
KnowltonL. M.1992. “Leadership in a Different Voice: An Ethnographic Study of a Latina Chief Executive Officer in a California College,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, niversity of San Diego.
6.
KohnA.1986. No Contest: The Case Against Competition.New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
7.
MaslowA. H.1970. Motivation and Personality.New York: Harper and Row.
8.
MillerJ. B.1976. Toward a Theory of Women's Development.Boston: Beacon.
9.
PollardD. S.1992. “Toward a Pluralistic Perspective on Equity,”Women's Educational Equity Act Publishing Center Digest, February.
10.
RosenerJ. B.1990. “Ways Women Lead,”Harvard Business Review, 68(6): 119–125.
11.
RosenerJ. B.1991. “Ways Men and Women Lead,”Harvard Business Review, 69(1): 150–160.
12.
SchusterD. J., and FooteT. H.1990. “Differences Abound between Male and Female Superintendents,”The School Administrator, 47(2): 14–19.
13.
SmithD. E.1978. “A Peculiar Eclipsing: Women's Exclusion from Man's Culture,Women's Studies International Quarterly, 1(4): 281–295.