AlexanderD., and ManattR. P.1992. “The Career Ladder Plan of Cave Creek Unified School District: A Case Study,” in Teacher Compensation and Motivation, FraseL., ed., Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., pp. 573–597.
2.
AndersonC. J., BarrA. S., and BushM. G.1925. Visiting the Teacher at Work.New York: Appleton-Century
CornettL. M., and GainesG. F.1993. “Incentive Programs: A Focus on Program Evaluation,”Career Ladder Clearing House, Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board, p. 12.
5.
DukeD. L., and StigginsR. J.1986. Teacher Evaluation: Five Keys to Growth.Washington, DC: Joint Publication of American Association of School Administrators, National Association of Elementary School Principals, National Association of Secondary School Principals, and National Education Association (NEA Library).
6.
GeertzC.1989. Works and Lives.Stanford: Stanford University Press, p. 73.
7.
GoldhammerR.1969. Clinical Supervision: Special Methods for the Supervision of Teachers.New York: Holt, Rinheart, & Winston.
8.
HildebaughE. J.1973. “A Model for Developing a Teacher Performance Evaluation System: A Multiple Appraiser Approach,” doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (DDJ 73-25224).
9.
JudkinsM.1987. “Identifying Discriminating Items for the Student Evaluation of Teachers,” doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (DEV 87-21899).
10.
LevinH. M., GlassG. V., and MeisterG. R.1984. “Cost Effectiveness of Four Educational Interventions,” IFG Project Report No. 84-All. Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, p. 3.
11.
ManattR. P.1987. “Lessons from a Comprehensive Appraisal Project,”Educational Leadership, 44(7): 8–14.
12.
ManattR. P.1988. “Teacher Performance Evaluation: A Total Systems Approach,” in Teacher Evaluation: Six Prescriptions for Success, StanleyS. J., and PophamW. G., eds., ASCD, pp. 79–108.
13.
ManattR. P.1993. “The Changing Paradigm of Outcomes and Assessment,”International Journal of Educational Reform, 2(1): 86–95.
14.
ManattR. P., and DanielsB.1990. “Relationships between Principal Ratings of Teacher Performance and Student Achievement,”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4: 189–201.
15.
ManattR. P., and HolzmanG. R.1991. “Criterion-Referenced Testing for Outcomes-Based Education,”Educational Considerations, 18(2): 22–24.
16.
ManattR. P., PalmerK., and HildebaughE.1976. “Evaluating Teacher Performance with Improved Rating Scales,”NASSP Bulletin, 60: 21–24.
17.
ManattR. P., and StowS. B.1984. Clinical Manual for Teacher Performance Evaluation.Iowa State University Research Foundation., Ames, IA.
18.
ManattR. P., and StowS.1986. “Developing and Testing a Model for Measuring and Improving Educational Outcomes of K–12 School,” Technical Report, Ames: Iowa State University.
19.
MedleyD. M.1992. “Teacher Evaluation,” in Encyclopedia of Educational Research, AlkinM., ed., Vol. 4, pp. 1345–1352.
20.
MenneJ. W.1972. “Teacher Evaluation: Performance or Effectiveness?” Mimeographed paper on file in School Improvement Model Office, Lagomarcino Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
21.
MenneJ. W., and TolsmaR. J.1971. “A Discrimination Index for Items in Instruments Using Group Responses,”Journal of Educational Measurement, 8: 5–7.
22.
OmatoniL. M.1992. “Refining Valid, Reliable and Discriminating Student Feedback Items for Use as One Component of a Total Teacher Performance Evaluation System,” doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
23.
PriceP. P.1992. “The Relationship of a Five Factor Algorithm to Placement of Teachers on a K–12 Career Ladder,” doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (DA 9223961).
24.
ScrivenM.1988. “Duty-Based Teacher Evaluation,”Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,” (1): 319–334.
25.
ScrivenM., WheelerP., and HaertelG.1991. Teachers Evaluation Models Project. The Center for Research in Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, p. 7.
26.
StevensF. L.1993. Opportunity to Learn: Issues for Poor and Minority Students. National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC20208–5574.
27.
StowS. B.1991. Components of a School Improvement Model (SIM) at Iowa State University. Unpublished document. SIM Office, N229 Lagomarcino Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 3 pp.
28.
StowS. B., and SweeneyJ. E.1981. “Developing a Teacher Performance Evaluation System,”Educational Leadership, 38: 538–541.
29.
TylerR.1949. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction.University of Chicago Press.
30.
Van MaanenJ.1988. Tales of the Field.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 73.
31.
WeberB. J.1992. “Reliability and Discrimination Power of Performance Criteria for Students’ Ratings of Teachers: A Comparison of K–5 and 6–12,” doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.