CarboM.1980. “An Analysis of the Relationships between the Modality Preferences of Kindergartners and Selected Reading Treatments as They Affect the Learning of a Basic Sight Word Vocabulary,”Dissertation Abstracts International.
2.
DibelloT.1985. “A Critical Analysis of the Achievement and Attitude Effects of Administrative Assignments to Social Studies Classes Writing Instruction Based on Identified, Eighth Grade Students’ Learning Style Preferences for Learning Alone, with Peers, or with Teachers,”Dissertation Abstracts International, 47: 68–01A.
3.
FreeleyM. E.1984. “An Experimental Investigation to the Relationships among Teachers’ Individual Time Preferences, Inservice Workshop Schedules, and Instructional Techniques and the Subsequent Implementation of Learning Style Strategies in Participants’ Classrooms,”Dissertation Abstracts International, 46: 403–02A.
4.
GaborA.1990. The Man Who Discovered Quality.New York: Time Books/Random House.
5.
GearyD. C., and FanL.1992. “Numerical Cognition: Loci of Ability Differences Comparing Children from China and the United States,”Psychological Science.
6.
GlasserW.1990. The Quality School.New York: Perennial Library.
7.
GregorcA. F.1979. “Learning/Teaching Styles: Potent Forces Behind Them,” Educational Leadership, 36:234–236; 1984. “Style as a Symptom: A Phenomenological Perspective,”Theory into Practice, 23: 51–54.
8.
ImaiM.1986. Kaizen: The Key to Japan's Competitive Success.New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
9.
JenkinsJ. M., LetteriC. A., and RosenlundP.1990. Developing Cognitive Skills.Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
10.
KeefeJ. W.1989. Accommodating Perceptual, Study and Instructional Preferences.Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
11.
KeefeJ. W., and MonkJ. S.1986. Learning Style Profile Examiner's Manual.Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
12.
LetteriC. A.1982. “Cognitive Profiles: Relationship to Achievement and Academic Success,” in Student Learning Styles and Brain Behavior: Programs, Instruments, Research.Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
13.
MartiniM.“An Analysis of the Relationship between and among Computer-Assisted Instruction, Learning Style Perceptual Preferences, Attitudes, and the Science Achievement of Seventh Grade Students in a Suburban New York School District,”Dissertation Abstracts International, 47: 877–03A.
14.
McCarthyB.1981. The 4-Mat System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right/Left Mode Techniques.Barrington, Illinois: Excel, Incorporated.
15.
PizzoJ.1984. “Investigation of the Relationships between Selected Acoustic Environments and Sound, an Element of Learning Style, as They Affect Sixth Grade Students’ Reading Achievement and Attitudes,”Dissertation Abstracts International, 46: 403–02A.
16.
SheaT. C.1983. “An Investigation of the Relationships among Selected Instructional Environments, Preferences for the Learning Style Element of Design, and Reading Achievement Testing of Ninth Grade Students to Improve Administrative Determinations Concerning Effective Educational Facilities,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, Jamaica, N.Y.