Although cross-sector alliances between public and private actors are recognized as a strategic approach to strengthening public sector development, including education, concerns about power imbalances remain, especially when one party has far greater economic and political capital. In developing countries such as Indonesia, this challenge is compounded by institutional and resource constraints in the era of regional autonomy. This qualitative study investigates the practices and dynamics of cross-sectoral CSR education partnerships for remote elementary schools around the world's largest coal mining area. The findings reveal “pseudo-partnerships” that perpetuate narratives of “declining” educational quality and reinforce unequal relationships between partners.
AdemiluaV.SuleL. A.AdeyeyeA. (2017). Cooperative societies and corporate social responsibilities (CSR) opportunities for rural developments in Africa. Journal of Culture, Society and Development, 30, 10–14.
2.
AslamM.KingdonG. G. (2021). Public–private partnerships in education: Do they offer an equitable solution to education in India and Pakistan? In Reforming education and challenging inequalities in southern contexts (pp. 79–97). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429293467
AzharA. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in educational programme among Malaysian primary schools: Perspectives from corporate companies in Malaysia. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4281
5.
BainerD. L. (1997). A comparison of four models of group efforts and their implications for establishing educational partnerships. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13(3), 143–152. https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/13-3_1.pdf
6.
BallS. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the ‘competition state. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802419474
7.
BallS. J.YoudellD. (2009). Hidden privatisation in public education. Education Review, 21(2), 73.
8.
BanerjeeS. B. (2001). Corporate citizenship and indigenous stakeholders: Exploring a new dynamic of organisational–stakeholder relationships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(Spring 2001), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2001.sp.00007
BowenG. A. (2009). Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: An illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802156196
11.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9(1), 26152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
12.
BrinkerhoffJ. M. (2002). Government–nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 22(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.203
13.
BrinkerhoffJ. M. (2003). Donor-funded government—NGO partnership for public service improvement: Cases from India and Pakistan. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022997006704
CardiniA. (2006). An analysis of the rhetoric and practice of educational partnerships in the UK: An arena of complexities, tensions and power. Journal of Education Policy, 21(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930600731773
16.
CarrollA. B.ShabanaK. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
17.
Castillo-VillarR. G. (2020). Identifying determinants of CSR implementation on SDG 17 partnerships for the goals. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1847989. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1847989
18.
ChappleW.MoonJ. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business & Society, 44(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281658
19.
CoatesW. C.JordanJ.ClarkeS. O. (2021). A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: Part 2—coding and thematic analysis. AEM Education and Training, 5(4), e10645. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10645
20.
CohenA.EyalO. (2021). Cross-sector alliances for democratic civic education: Do they serve the common good?Peabody Journal of Education, 96(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2021.1943237
21.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
22.
Das GuptaA. (2014). Implementing corporate social responsibility in India: Issues and the beyond. In RayS.Siva RajuS. (Eds.), Implementing corporate social responsibility (pp. 19–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1653-7_2
23.
DavidsonD. K.TanimotoK.JunL. G.TanejaS.TanejaP. K.YinJ. (2018). Corporate social responsibility across Asia: A review of four countries. In Corporate social responsibility (pp. 73–132). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920180000002003
24.
DaviesB.HentschkeG. (2006). Public–private partnerships in education: Insights from the field. School Leadership & Management, 26(3), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430600736977
25.
DowneyP. R. (2002). The essential stakeholder dialogue. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1
EwejeG.SajjadA.NathS. D.KobayashiK. (2020). Multi-stakeholder partnerships: A catalyst to achieve sustainable development goals. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(2), 186–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-04-2020-0135
29.
EyalO.YarmM. (2018). Schools in cross-sector alliances: What do schools seek in partnerships?Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 648–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18765268
30.
Findlay-BrooksR.VisserW.WrightT. (2010). Cross-sector partnership as an approach to inclusive development. In UttingP.MarquesJ. C. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance. International politica economy series (pp. 180–202). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246966_8
31.
GunawanJ.TwaddleM.FraserK. (2016). Exploring sustainable CSR for Indonesia by forming strategic partnerships between industry sectors. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 18(11), 2319–7668. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1811017278
32.
HadisuamardjoH. (2014). Efektivitas implementasi kebijakan program CSR dalam bidang pendidikan. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v21i2.6675
33.
HamannR.KapelusP.SonnenbergD.MackenzieA.HollesenP. (2005). Local governance as a complex system: Lessons from mining in South Africa, Mali and Zambia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 18(Summer 2005), 61–73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jcorpciti.18.61
34.
HendrayaniY.HashimN. H. (2018). Participatory communication in corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices: Evaluation process in cross-sector partnership for sustainable development. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 140. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.276
35.
IdemudiaU. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and developing countries: Moving the critical CSR research agenda in Africa forward. Progress in Development Studies, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/146499341001100101
36.
IsmailM.Ibnu KassimM.Rozi Mohd AmitM.Mohd RasdiR. (2014). Orientation, attitude, and competency as predictors of manager’s role of CSR-implementing companies in Malaysia. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(5), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-09-2013-0100
37.
JamaliD.KeshishianT. (2009). Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9708-1
38.
JasińskaE.JasińskiM. (2022). Mining industry corporate social responsibility to education development. Resources, 11(7), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11070065
39.
JunH.KimM. (2021). From stakeholder communication to engagement for the sustainable development goals (SDGs): A case study of LG electronics. Sustainability, 13(15), 8624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158624
40.
KellehearA. (2020). The unobtrusive researcher: A guide to methods. Routledge.
41.
KharisA.HasanS. (2020). Model kemitraan perguruan tinggi-perusahaan dan pemerintah dalam bingkai corporate social responsibility. KOMUNITAS, 11(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.20414/komunitas.v11i1.1960
42.
LangrafeT. F.BarakatS. R.StockerF.BoaventuraJ. M. G. (2020). A stakeholder theory approach to creating value in higher education institutions. The Bottom Line, 33(4), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-03-2020-0021
43.
Le BerM. J.BranzeiO. (2010). Value frame fusion in cross sector interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(Suppl 1), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0785-1
44.
LimJ. S.GreenwoodC. A. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR): Stakeholder responsiveness and engagement strategy to achieve CSR goals. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.06.007
45.
LukmanG. A.RaharjoS. T.ResnawatyR.HumaediS. (2022). Pemangku kepentingan (stakeholders) dalam program kawasan ekonomi masyarakat (KEM) Bengkala (Program CSR PT Pertamina DPPU Ngurah Rai). Share: Social Work Journal, 12(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.24198/share.v12i2.37024
46.
MaguireM.DelahuntB. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 3351. https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335
47.
MahlatjiM. L.SeshokaM. W.MabasaL. T. (2023). Instructional leadership in literacy in the foundation phase of primary schools during COVID-19 pandemic, Capricorn District, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Reform, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231202483
48.
MakowerJ. (2011). Beyond the bottom line: Putting social responsibility to work for your business and the world. Simon and Schuster.
49.
MeydanC. H.AkkaşH. (2024). The role of triangulation in qualitative research: Converging perspectives. In Principles of conducting qualitative research in multicultural settings (pp. 98–129). IGI Global.
50.
MoleongL. J. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
51.
MuhammadS.ArifinS.SyamR.PutraB. A. (2024). On the brink of social resistance: Local community perceptions of mining company operating permits in east luwu, Indonesia. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1373736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1373736
52.
MustofaA. (2012). Analisis program corporate social responsibility (CSR) dalam pembangunan berkelanjutan di jawa timur dengan prespektif policy governance. Jurnal Demokrasi, 11(1), 233–258.
53.
MuthuriJ. N.MattenD.MoonJ. (2009). Employee volunteering and social capital: Contributions to corporate social responsibility. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00551.x
54.
NijkampP.Van Der BurchM.VindigniG. (2002). A comparative institutional evaluation of public-private partnerships in Dutch urban land-use and revitalisation projects. Urban Studies, 39(10), 1865–1880. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098022000002993
55.
NugrohoP. J.HartantoT. J. (2023). Quality profile of remote areas elementary schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 922–933. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2456
56.
O’riordanL.FairbrassJ. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9662-y
57.
PalupiS. (2021). Educational partnership design of diploma ii study program of culinary with the corporate world. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(5), 1138–1156. http://annalsofrscb.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/4465
58.
PatrinosH. A.OsorioF. B.GuáquetaJ. (2009). The role and impact of public-private partnerships in education. World Bank Publications.
59.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
60.
PujiyonoP.WiwohoJ.& TriyantoT. (2016). Model pertanggungjawaban hukum pelaksanaan corporate sosial responsibility (CSR) untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Yustisia, 5(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8716
61.
RamadhanQ. G. (2023). Dampak sosial ekonomi pembangunan perkebunan kelapa sawit terhadap masyarakat di Kecamatan Tikke Raya Kabupaten Pasangkayu Provinsi Sulawesi Barat [IPDN].
62.
RiyantiC.RaharjoS. T. (2021). Asset based community development dalam program corporate social responsibility (CSR). Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 3(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v3i1.32144
63.
RobertsonS. L.VergerA. (2012). Governing education through public private partnerships. In Public private partnerships in education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
64.
RooiN.BothaD.Van der WaldtG. (2023). Corporate social responsibility applications in the retail sector: Lessons from the international experience. Journal of Contemporary Management, 20(1), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.35683/jcman1023.206
65.
RuditoB.FamiolaM.AnggahegariP. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and social capital: Journey of community engagement toward community empowerment program in developing country. Sustainability, 15(1), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010466
66.
RusdiantoU. (2013). CSR di era otonomi. Prenada Media Group.
67.
SalamA. (2024). Inter-sector collaboration in implementation poverty alleviation program through corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 9(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.22225/pi.9.2.2024.143-157
68.
SamiiR.Van WassenhoveL. N.BhattacharyaS. (2002). An innovative public–private partnership: New approach to development. World Development, 30(6), 991–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00015-3
69.
SelviK. (2008). Phenomenological approach in education. In TymienickaA. T. (Ed.), Education in human creative existential planning. Analecta husserliana, vol 95 (pp. 39–51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6302-2_4
70.
SiregarI. (2021). CSR-based corporate environmental policy implementation. British Journal of Environmental Studies, 1(1), 51–57.
71.
StadtlerL.SeitanidiM. M.KnightH. H.LeighJ.ClarkeA.Le BerM. J.BogieJ.BruneseP.HustadO.KrasonikolakisI. (2024). Cross-sector partnerships to address societal grand challenges: Systematizing differences in scholarly analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 61(7), 3327–3357. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13053
72.
StockerF.de ArrudaM. P.de MascenaK. M. C.BoaventuraJ. M. G. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: A classification model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2071–2080. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1947
73.
SumintonoB. (2013). Sekolah unggulan: Pendekatan pengembangan kapasitas sekolah. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.26877/jmp.v2i1.401
74.
SuryaniD.DjoharwinarlienS. (2010). The politics of corporate social responsibility (Studi tentang peran forum multistakeholder CSR dalam melakukan kontrol terhadap CSR sebagai co-production dalam penyediaan public goods di Kabupaten Kutai Timur). Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/121180
75.
TanimotoK. (2019). Do multi-stakeholder initiatives make for better CSR?Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(4), 704–716. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2018-0267
ThorneL.MahoneyL. S.GregoryK.ConveryS. (2017). A comparison of Canadian and US CSR strategic alliances, CSR reporting, and CSR performance: Insights into implicit–explicit CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2799-6
78.
TuokuuF. X. D.Amponsah-TawiahK. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Is it an alternative to government?Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-05-2015-0007
VergerA. (2012). Framing and selling global education policy: The promotion of public–private partnerships for education in low-income contexts. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.623242
81.
WaddellS. (2000). New institutions for the practice of corporate citizenship: Historical, intersectoral, and developmental perspectives. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00067
82.
WameaJ. H.IslamiD. I.SrisadonoW. (2023). Implementasi CSR PT. Pertamina retail dalam program pertamina retail peduli stunting. Jurnal Cyber PR, 3(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.32509/cyberpr.v3i2.3771
83.
WilliamsonB. (2018). Silicon startup schools: Technocracy, algorithmic imaginaries and venture philanthropy in corporate education reform. Critical Studies in Education, 59(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1186710
84.
WohlstetterP.SmithJ.FarrellC. C. (2015). The choices and challenges of charter schools, revisited. Journal of School Choice, 9(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2015.1000775
85.
WymerW. W.SamuS. (2003). Dimensions of business and nonprofit collaborative relationships. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v11n01_02
86.
YeminiM. (2017). Conceptualizing the role of nonprofit intermediaries in pursuing entrepreneurship within schools in Israel. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 980–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217720458
87.
YeminiM.SagieN. (2015). School–nongovernmental organization engagement as an entrepreneurial venture: A case study of sunlight’s engagement with Israeli schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X14540171
88.
YingM.ShanH.TikuyeG. A. (2021). How do stakeholder pressures affect corporate social responsibility adoption? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 14(1), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010443
