This study investigated the impact of students’ mathematical abilities in algebraic equations on their performance in physics on the Form Four Mock Examination. In this mixed-method study, 160 students’ mathematics and physics scores from high- and low-performing schools in Tanzania's Tabora region were analyzed using logistic regression. It was found that students who scored high on algebraic equations-based questions were more likely to perform well on physics problems requiring algebraic application. We concluded that students’ coincidentally low performance in secondary mathematics and physics is partly due to a lack of necessary mathematics skills required to solve physics problems. This implies that improving mathematics learning is essential for enhancing physics performance.
Agudelo-ValderramaC.MartínezD. (2016). In pursuit of a connected way of knowing: The case of one mathematics teacher. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9598-x
2.
AlinkN.AsseltR. V.BraberN. D. (2012). Coherence between mathematics and the profile subjects. SLO.
3.
BassonI. (2002). Physics and mathematics as interrelated fields of thought development using acceleration as an example. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33(5), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390210146023
4.
BowersJ.AndersonM.BeckhardK. (2023). A mathematics educator walks into a physics class: Identifying math skills in students’ physics problem-solving practices. Journal for STEM Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00105-w
5.
CarraherD. W.SchliemannA. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In LesterF. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669–705). Information Age.
6.
CarrejoD. J.MarshallJ. (2007). What is mathematical modelling? Exploring prospective teachers’ use of experiments to connect mathematics to the study of motion. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217449
7.
ChassyP.JonesJ. (2019). The role of mathematics in the learning of physics. Open Access Journal of Mathematical and Theoretical Physics, 2(1), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.15406/oajmtp.2019.02.00045
8.
ChiM. T. H. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and the learning outcome. In VosniadouS. (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 49–70). Routledge.
9.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications Ink.
10.
DawkinsK. R.DickersonD. L.McKinneyS. E.ButlerS. (2008). Teaching density to middle school students: Preservice science teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.82.1.21-26
11.
EkiciE. (2016). Why do I slog through the physics?” understanding high school students’ difficulties in learning physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(7), 95–104.
12.
GacovskaB. A.MitrevskiB.BarandovskiL. (2023). Students’ ability to use geometry knowledge in solving problems of geometrical optics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(10), 2071–2085. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2184278
13.
HanssonL.HanssonÖJuterK.RedforsA. (2021). Curriculum emphases, mathematics and teaching practices: Swedish upper-secondary physics teachers’ views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(3), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10078-6
14.
JohanssonH.ÖsterholmM. (2023). Algebra discourses in mathematics and physics textbooks: Comparing the use of algebraic symbols. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2226154
15.
KittaS. (2015). Development of mathematics teachers: Experience from Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2015.11917602
16.
LeeS. W.MaoX. (2021). Algebra by the eighth grade: The Association between early study of algebra I and students’ academic success. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(6), 1271–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10116-3
17.
MeltzerD. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
18.
National Examinations Council of Tanzania. (2014). Guidelines for the implementation of pass rates and procedures for awarding Form Four and Form Six results. NECTA.
19.
National Examinations Council of Tanzania. (2018a). Candidates’ item response analysis report for the certificate of secondary education examination: Basic mathematics. NECTA.
20.
National Examinations Council of Tanzania. (2018b). Candidates’ item response analysis report for the certificate of secondary education examination: Physics. NECTA.
21.
NdalichakoJ. L.KombaA. A. (2014). Students’ subject choice in secondary schools in Tanzania: A matter of Students’ ability and interests or forced circumstances?Open Journal of Social Sciences, 02(08), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.28008
22.
PlaninicM.Milin-SipusZ.KaticH.SusacA.IvanjekL. (2012). Comparison of student understanding of line graph slope in physics and mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9344-1
23.
RedishE. F. (2023). Using math in physics: Reading the physics in a graph. The Physics Teacher, 61(8), 651–656. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0150860
24.
RedishE. F.KuoE. (2015). Language of physics, language of math: Disciplinary culture and dynamic epistemology. Science & Education, 24(5–6), 561–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7
25.
SanchezJ. M. P.PonceM. A. (2020). Physics-Mathematics associations: Evidence from TIMSS student achievements. Science Education International, 31(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i3.1
26.
Tanzania Institute of Education. (2019). Physics for advanced secondary schools: Students’ book form five. TIE.
27.
Tarmo, A. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ epistemological beliefs and teaching reforms in Tanzania. Cogent education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1178457
28.
Tarmo, A. P. (2019). Science teachers' beliefs and the epistemological underpinnings of the science curriculum for secondary education in Tanzania. Papers in Education and Development, 37(2), 23–46.
VelooA.NorR.KhalidR. (2015). Attitude towards physics and additional mathematics achievement towards physics achievement. International Education Studies, 8(3), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p35
31.
WangJ. (2005). Relationship between mathematics and science achievement at the 8th grade. International Online Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 1–17.
32.
WennoI. H. (2015). The correlation study of interest at physics and knowledge of mathematics basic concepts towards the ability to solve physics problems of 7th grade students at Junior High School in Ambon Maluku Province, Indonesia. Education Research International, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/396750
33.
WoolnoughJ. (2000). How do students learn to apply their mathematical knowledge to interpret graphs in physics?Research in Science Education, 30(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461633
34.
YamaneT. (1967). Statistics, an introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.
35.
ZoharA. (2006). Connected knowledge in science and mathematics education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1579–1599. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500439199
