Accountability System,Academic Autonomy,and Freedom of Academia Versus Pathways to Educational Excellence in Hawassa University,Ethiopia

Abstract

The study examined integrated effects of implementation of accountability system, institutional autonomy, and academic freedom of academia versus pathways to educational (professional, leadership and pedagogical) excellence in Hawassa University. The study answered the central research question: “What do the effects of implementation of accountability, academic autonomy and freedom of academia versus professional, leadership and pedagogical excellences look-like?” The study employed mixed method with concurrent triangulation design. The researchers selected samples of the study using purposive, convenient, stratified, and simple random sampling techniques. The researchers collected data using questionnaires, unstructured interviews, and document examination and analyzed data using descriptive and inferential statistics and thematic narration using SPSS-26 and NVivo-14, respectively. There were multiple gaps pertaining implementing performance-based and professional-based internal accountability to accomplish institutional visions, missions, and mutual goals. The findings of the study showed that although academic autonomy relates to the independence of academic institutions in decision-making concerning curriculum, teaching methods, research, and academic policies, it shows practical gaps concerning teachers’ and students’ academic freedom. This includes challenges related to quality teaching, research, community services, and expression of views to criticize the weakness of institutional censorship. The study recommends that the practice of accountability strategies, technological, and pedagogical innovation toward striving for educational excellences needed improvements. Managerial, technological, and pedagogical innovation should promote decision-making competencies, professional, leadership, and pedagogical excellence.

Keywords

accountability academic freedom decision-making institutional autonomy university graduates educational excellence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akalu

G. A.

(2014). Higher education in Ethiopia: Expansion, quality assurance and institutional autonomy. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(4), 394–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12036. Accessed on December 2019

Altbach

P. G.

(2013). The international imperative in higher education (Global perspectives on higher education). Sense Publishers.

Altbach

P. G.

Reisberg

Rumbley

L. E.

(2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. New York: UNESCO.

Best

J. W.

Kahn

J. U.

(2006). Research in education (4th Ed.). Prentice Hall Publication.

Bothma

Rossouw

J. P.

(2019). The accountability and professional security of the South African higher education lecturer. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(2), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-2-2463

Cheng

(2012). Accountability and professionalism: A contradiction in terms? Higher Education Research and Development, 31(6), 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.653960

Clark

(2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196

Cochran

W. G.

(1977). Sampling technique (3rd Ed.). John Wiley and Sons.

Cohen

Manion

Morrison

(2018). Research methods in education (8^th Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

10.

Creswell

J. W.

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed approaches (4th Ed.). Sage Publisher Inc.

11.

Creswell

J. W.

David

C. J.

(2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th Ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

12.

DHET (Department of Higher Education and Training). (2013). Statistics on post-school education and training in South Africa: 2013. Pretoria.

13.

El-Khawas

(2006). Accountability and quality assurance: New issues for academic inquiry. In Forest

J. J. F.

Altbach

P. G.

(Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 24–26). Springer.

14.

Fischer

S. M.

(2022). Teachers’ empathy for bullying victims, understanding of violence, and likelihood of intervention. Journal of School Violence. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15388220.2022.2114488

15.

Fullan

Hargreaves

(2015). Professional capital as accountability: Educational change as social movement in Mexico, view project liberating. Journal of Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(15), 1–23. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v23.1998: Lynch School of Education, Boston College United States

16.

Girma

Aklilu

(2023). Effectiveness of teaching-learning, research and innovative actions in Hawassa University, Ethiopia. Journal of Cogent Education, 10(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023//2214222

17.

Hargreaves

Fullan

(2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Education.

18.

Hargreaves

Shirley

(2012). The global fourth way. Corwin Press.

19.

Jones

(2019). Critical thinking in the age of autonomy. Global Education Insights. Scholars Publishing.

20.

Kennedy

M. M.

(2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800

21.

Kouritzin

(2020). Extent and consequences of faculty members’ workload creep in three Canadian faculties of education. Canadian Journal of Education, 42(4), 1092–1120. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/4095

22.

Lennox

(2018). A review of the archival literature on audit partner. Accounting Horizons. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3049323

23.

Lewin

(2018). Toward a theory of pedagogical reduction: Selection, simplification, and generalization in an age of critical education. Educational Theory Visibility. Sociology, Education, Mathematics Education, Educational Theory.

24.

Lüde

R. V.

(2015). Academic freedom under pressure: From collegial governance to new managerialism. In Zgag

Teichler

Schuetze

H. G.

Wolter

(Eds.), Higher education reform: Looking back-looking forward (pp. 51–157). National Policy of Education, Delhi University.

25.

Lyubimov

L. L.

(2009). Fading of the educational ethos. Voprosy Obrazovaniya, 8(1), 199–210.

26.

Nelson

(2019). Autonomy and education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.173

27.

Nokkala

Bacevic

(2014). University autonomy, agenda setting and the construction of agency: The case of the European university association in the European higher education area. European Educational Research Journal, 13(6), 214–226. Retrieved from www.wwwords.ev/EERJ. Accessed on December/2020 https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.6.699

28.

Olsen

J. P.

(2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 460–472.

29.

Ortiz

(2022). Balancing autonomy in educational landscapes. Global educator's digest. sky publications.

30.

Purcell

(2008). People management and performance. Human Resource Management International Digest. https://doi.org/10.1108/hrmid.2010.04418aae.002

31.

Schmidt

K. E.

Langberg

(2007). Academic autonomy in a rapid changing higher education framework. European Education, 39(4), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934390406

32.

Smith

(2018). Curriculum design in the age of autonomy. modern education review. University Press.

33.

Stanley

(2012). Clinical leadership and innovation. International Journal of Nursing, 2(2), 119–126.

34.

Stensaker

Harvey

(Eds.) (2011). Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. Routledge.

35.

Taiwo

A. E.

(2012). The regulatory bodies, academic freedom and institutional autonomy Africa: Issues and challenges, Nigerian Example.

36.

Taylor

(2017). Bias in the classroom: A hidden challenge. Teacher’s Journal, 15(1), 89–97.

37.

Teelken

(2012). Compliance or pragmatism: How do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? A comparative study in three countries. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.511171

38.

Thompson

(2020). Making work private: Autonomy, intensification and accountability. European Educational Research Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904121996134

39.

UNESCO . (2018). Beyond commitments. How countries implement SDG4. Global Education Monitoring Report Team. UNESCO.

40.

Weimer

(2010). Moving past the old ‘Teaching vs. Research’. Debate. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/faculty-development/moving-past-the-oldteaching-vs-research-debate/. Accessed 10 December 2020

41.

Williams

(2020). Economic impacts of institutional independence. Economic and Education Quarterly, 31(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.177/2041905820958823

42.

Yang

Vidovich

Currie

(2007). Dancing in a cage: Changing autonomy in chinese higher education. Higher Education, 54(1), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9009-5

43.

Yin

R. K.

(2018). Case study research: Design and methods (5th Ed.). Sage.