Reader Response Approach for Enhancing Literary Comprehension in an EFL Context

Abstract

This article examines the impact of Reader Response Approach (RRA) on learners’ autonomy in interpreting literary texts in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classes. The research involved graduate-level students and teachers from two public universities of Nepal, through Participatory Action Research (PAR). Data were gathered from two Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), twelve classroom observations, and two Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), involving a total of 54 participants. The analysis, based on the principles of socio-constructivism, revealed that RRA-based classes provided students with greater freedom and ample opportunities to engage in discussions on literary texts, connecting them to their personal beliefs and values by fostering their active participation.

Keywords

Reader response approach foreign language literary texts participatory action research and teaching literature

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Education 3-13, 34(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893

Ary

Jackobs

L. C.

Sorensen

(2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Atherton

J. S.

(2013). Learning and teaching; experiential learning. http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/experience.htm.

Beach

(1993). A teacher's introduction to reader-response theories (NCTE Teacher's Introduction Series). National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) 1111 West Kenyon Road, Urbana, Illinois. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED355523.pdf.

Bekkar

(2021). Teaching English language through literary texts: A way of implementing linguistic competencies at the secondary school level [Doctoral Dissertation]. Faculty of Letters, Languages, and Arts; Department of the English Language; DjillaliLiabes University, Sidi Bel Abbés]. http://rdoc.univ-sba.dz/bitstream/123456789/3596/1/DS_Ang_BEKKAR_Miloud.pdf.

Bobkina

Stefanova

(2016). Literature and critical literacy pedagogy in the EFL classroom: Towards a model of teaching critical thinking skills. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.4.6

Boubekeur

(2021). Teaching short stories through the use of the reader-response theory: Second-year students at Dr. Moulay Tahar University-Saida. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 12(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.6

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bryman

Bell

(2019). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

10.

Burns

(2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.

11.

Carr

Kemmis

(2003). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com.np/books?id=eVGPAgAAQBAJ .

12.

Carter

(2007). Literature and language teaching 1986–2006: A review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00130.x

13.

Cohen

Manion

Morrison

(2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.

14.

Collie

Slater

(1987). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge University Press.

15.

Cook

(1994). Discourse and literature: The interplay of form and mind. Oxford University Press.

16.

Creswell

J. W.

(2016). 30 essential skills for the researcher. Sage Publications, Inc.

17.

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

18.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

19.

Davies

A. Z.

Stratton

(1984). How to teach poetry: An African perspective. Heinemann Educational.

20.

Dias

Hayhoe

(1989). Developing response to poetry. Philadelphia Open University Press.

21.

Duff

Maley

(1990). Literature. Oxford University Press.

22.

Elliott

(1991). Action research for educational change. Open University Press. https://books.google.com.np/books?id=DlOgQgAACAAJ .

23.

Fairclough

(1992). Critical language awareness. Routledge.

24.

Farahian

Farshid

(2014). A reader-response approach to reading: Does it have an effect on metacognitive reading strategies? Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 4(1), 371. https://mjltm.org/browse.php?mag_id=12&slc_lang=en&sid=1 .

25.

Garzón

Castañeda-Peña

(2015). Applying the reader-response theory to literary texts in EFL pre-service teachers’ initial education. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 187–198. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1075453.pdf . https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n8p187

26.

Gillham

(2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Open University Press. https://books.google.com.np/books?id=ZteO8mevN08C

27.

Gillis

Jackson

(2002). Research for nurses: Methods and interpretation. F.A. Davis Company. https://books.google.com.np/books?id=JxqFQgAACAAJ .

28.

Gilroy

Parkinson

(1996). Teaching literature in a foreign language. Language Teaching, 29(04), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480000851X

29.

Hammond

Wellington

(2021). Research methods: The key concepts (2nd ed.). Routledge.

30.

Hişmanoğlu

(2005). Teaching English through literature. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 53–66. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/104660 .

31.

Iskhak

(2016). The application of reader-response theory in enhancing student teachers’ affective and linguistic growth: A classroom action research in EFL teacher education in Indonesia. The English Teacher, 44(2), 43. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1711389274 .

32.

Iskhak

Mujiyanto

Hartono

(2020). A review on reader response approach to teaching literature at EFL contexts. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p118

33.

Jiang

(2018). Reader-response approach used in Chinese EFL context: An alternative approach to teach literature (In 3rd International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology (HSMET 2018)). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 237, 424–427. https://doi.org/10.2991/hsmet-18.2018.83

34.

Kandel

R. K.

(2014). Resolving ELT challenges through critical thinking strategies. Journal of NELTA Surkhet, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3126/jns.v4i0.12854

35.

Kandel

R. K.

(2019). Postmethod pedagogy in teaching English as a foreign language: Students’ perceptions. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 2, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.3126/jong.v2i0.26606

36.

Kandel

R. K.

(2023). Basic school teachers’ perceptions on ICT integration in English as a foreign language instruction and their praxis [M. Phil. Dissertation, Faculty of Social Sciences and Education]. Nepal Open University, Manbhawan Lalitpur.

37.

Kelly

P. R.

Farnan

Richardson

J. J.

(1996). Reader response: A way to help children with learning difficulties think about literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 12(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356960120203

38.

Kosnoski

(2005). Artful discussion: John Dewey’s classroom as a model of deliberative association. Political Theory, 33(5), 654–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704272542

39.

Langer

J. A.

(1994). A response-based approach to reading literature. National Research Center on Literature Teaching and Learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED366946.pdf .

40.

Lazar

(1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge University Press.

41.

Leonard

Noh

Orey

(2010). Introduction to emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. In Orey

(Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology (pp. 8–24). The Global Text Project.

42.

Luke

(1991). Literacies as social practices. English Education, 23(3), 131–147. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40172758 .

43.

Maretha

Maisarah

Wulandari

M. F.

(2023). The students’ perception in using short story at EFL classroom. Journal of ESP in Indonesia, 2(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.33369/espindonesia.v1i2.26216

44.

Mart

C. T.

(2019). Reader-response theory and literature discussions: A springboard for exploring literary texts. The New Educational Review, 56(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.19.56.2.06

45.

Martin

D. J.

(2009). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.

46.

Ningrum

C. H.

(2018). The use of reader-response theory to teach Reading narrative text for tenth graders of senior high school. Retain, 6(1), 95–103. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230779075.pdf .

47.

Oster

(1989). Seeing with different eyes: Another view of literature in the ESL class. TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587509

48.

Price

E. A.

Driscoll

M. P.

(1997). An inquiry into the spontaneous transfer of problem-solving skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 472–494. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0948

49.

Raines

A. S.

(2005). Louise Rosenblatt: An advocate for nurturing democratic participation through literary transactions. Talking Points, 17(1), 28–31.

50.

Regmi

L. R.

(2021). An analysis of approaches to teaching literature. Curriculum Development Journal, 29(43), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.3126/cdj.v29i43.41044

51.

Roen

Karolides

N. J.

(2005). Louise Rosenblatt: A life in literacy. ALAN Review, 32(3), 59–61. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/louise-rosenblatt-life-literacy/docview/212211396/se-2 . https://doi.org/10.21061/alan.v32i3.a.10

52.

Rosenblatt

(2005). Making meaning with texts: Selected essays. Heinemann.

53.

Rosenblatt

L. M.

(1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.

54.

Schwartz

N. H.

Ellsworth

L. S.

Graham

Knight

(1998). Accessing prior knowledge to remember text: A comparison of advance organizers and maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0958

55.

Shtepani

(2012). Overview on the use of literary texts in EFL classes. Lingua mobilis, 6(39), 7–14. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/overview-on-the-use-of-literary-texts-in-efl-classes .

56.

Spirovska

(2019). Reader-response theory and approach: Application, values and significance for students in literature courses. SEEU Review, 14(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2019-0003

57.

Tucker

L. P.

(2000). Liberating students through reader-response pedagogy in the introductory literature course. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 28(2), 199–206. https://www.proquest.com/docview/220943146?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true .

58.

Watkins

(2020). Reading collaborative reading partnerships in a school community. Changing English, 27(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2019.1682966

59.

Wood

K. D.

Roser

N. L.

Martinez

(2001). Collaborative literacy: Lessons learned from literature. The Reading Teacher, 55(2), 102–111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205020 .

60.

Wright

(1975). Because I was invited. Oxford University Press.

61.

Yang

(2002). Science fiction in the EFL class. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310208666632