The study aimed to measure the effect of digital pedagogical skills of mathematics teachers and their awareness on student learning performance. The cross-sectional survey design was used among 462 mathematics teachers in Nepal. Structural equation modeling and machine learning were the main statistical techniques used in the study. The findings indicate that teachers’ digital pedagogical skills were significantly low in internet surfing, using communication tools, subject-related applications, and the development of audiovisual instructional materials. Internet surfing skills and collaboration tools are significant predictors of policy and ethical digital awareness.
AcharyaS. (2016). Internet usage of teenagers in Nepal for educational purposes. An analysis of Internet usage behaviour of 15-17-year-old students at selected schools in Kathmandu (Issue February). https://tinyurl.com/23ye23nk
2.
AkturkA. O.OzturkH. S. (2019). Teachers’ TPACK levels and students’ self-efficacy as predictors of students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 283–294.
3.
AlbrahimF. A. (2020). Online teaching skills and competencies. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 9–20.
4.
AldhafeeriF.PalaiologouI.FolorunshoA. (2016). Integration of digital technologies into play-based pedagogy in Kuwaiti early childhood education: teachers’ views, attitudes and aptitudes. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2016.1172477
5.
AliZ.BuschM.Nasim QaisraniM.Ur RehmanH.AuthorC. (2020). The influence of teachers’ professional competencies on students achievement: A quantitative research study. American Research Journal of Humanities & Social Science, 6, 45–54. www.arjhss.com
6.
AllyM. (2019). Competency profile of the digital and online teacher in future education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4206
7.
AmhagL.HellströmL.StigmarM. (2019). Teacher educators’ use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169
8.
ArtachoE. G.MartínezT. S.Ortega MartínJ. L.Marín MarínJ. A.GarcíaG. G. (2020). Teacher training in lifelong learning-the importance of digital competence in the encouragement of teaching innovation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072852
9.
AyranciB. B.BaşkanA. (2021). Competence areas as a new notion instead of teacher competencies. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.221
10.
BaranE.CorreiaA. P.ThompsonA. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293
11.
BentlerP MBonettD G (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
12.
CaenaF.RedeckerC. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators. European Journal of Education, 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
13.
ChoM. H.TobiasS. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V17I2.2342
14.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed). Taylor and Francis.
15.
Crative Research System (2021). Sample size calculator—confidence level, confidence interval, sample size, population size, relevant population. Creative Research System. https://tinyurl.com/5c75br68
16.
DangwalK. L.SrivastavaS. (2016). Digital pedagogy in teacher education. International Journal of Information Science and Computing, 3(2), 67–72.
DhawanS. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
19.
DiamantopoulosA.SiguawJ. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. SAGE Publication. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-9533.2016.00008.9
20.
DoreL.GeragthyA.RiordanG. O. (2015). Towards a national digital skills framework for Irish higher education. https://tinyurl.com/bdhx4yrr
21.
EngelbrechtJ.LlinaresS.BorbaM. C. (2020). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 52(5), 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01176-4
22.
EngenB. K. (2019). Understanding social and cultural aspects of teachers’ digital competencies. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 27(61), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-01
23.
ERO. (2018). National assessment of student achievement 2018. https://www.ero.gov.np/post/6_ 609a764188141
FalloonG. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The Teacher Digital Competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
GudmundsdottirG. B.HatlevikO. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
29.
Guillén-GámezF. D.Mayorga-FernándezM. J.Bravo-AgapitoJ.Escribano-OrtizD. (2020). Analysis of teachers’ pedagogical digital competence: Identification of factors predicting their acquisition. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(3), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09432-7
30.
HatlevikO. E.GuomundsdottirG. B.LoiM. (2015). Examining factors predicting students’ digital competence. Journal of Information Technology Education, 14, 123–137. https://tinyurl.com/2p8pbxz2
31.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
IqbalA.HussainS.MushtaqS.JavaidZ. (2019). Effect of teachers ‘competencies on scholars’ academic achievement and aatisfaction. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 8(1), 9–16. https://tinyurl.com/yhbmm7dk
JoshiD. (2017). Policies, practices, and barriers to ICT utilization in school education in Nepal. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 7(2), 408–417. https://www.ijmra.us/2017ijrss_february.php
38.
Joshi, D. R., Chitrakar, R., Belbase, S., & Khanal, B. (2021a).ICT competency of mathematics teachers at secondary schools of Nepal. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), e02107. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/10847
39.
Joshi, D. R., Neupane, U., & Joshi, P. R. (2021b). Synthesis review of digital frameworks and DEPSWALIC Digital competency framework for teachers from basic to University Level. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 13(2), 108–136. https://commons.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2021/07/v13n2-Synthesis-Review-of-Digital-Frameworks.pdf
40.
Joshi, D. R., & Rawal, M. (2021). Mathematics teachers standing on the utilization of digital resources in Kathmandu, Nepal. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 2(1), ep21004. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/9679
41.
JoynesC.RossignoliS.Amonoo-KuofiE. F. (2019). 21st Century skills: Evidence of issues in definition, demand and delivery for development contexts. https://tinyurl.com/4ezyenxe
42.
KelentricM.HellandK.ArstorpA.-T. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education. https://tinyurl.com/457dznx9
43.
Khanal B., Belbase, S. & Joshi, D. R. (2021). Effect of digital awareness on mathematics achievements at school to university levels in Nepal. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(4), 47–68. https://tinyurl.com/2pv5kywk
44.
KimM. K.XieK.ChengS. L. (2017). Building teacher competency for digital content evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.006
45.
KimuraD.TatsunoM., & GiFT. (2017). Advancing 21st century competencies in Japan.
46.
KoehlerM. J.MishraP. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/29544/
47.
KoehlerM. J.MishraP.CainW. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
48.
KozuhA.MaksimovicJ.Osmanovic ZajicJ. (2021). Fourth industrial revolution and digital competences of teachers. World Journal on Educational Technology, 13(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5651
49.
LiY.WangQ.LeiJ. (2020). Exploring technology professional development needs of digital immigrant teachers and digital native teachers in China. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 16(3), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2020070102
50.
MaccallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
51.
MaksimovićJ.DimićN. (2016). Digital technology and teachers’ competence for its application in the classroom. Research in Pedagogy, 6(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.35
52.
MoCIT (2019). 2019 digital Nepal framework. In Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. https://tinyurl.com/2p8ww7sv
MurkatikK.HarapanE.WardiahD. (2020). The influence of professional and pedagogic competence on teacher’s performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 1(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v1i1.10
59.
My Easy Statistics. (2020). How to test the Convergent Validity and Discriminant Validity of SEM Model? - YouTube. My Easy Statistics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5esq4D5ZG4s
60.
NortvigA.-M.PetersenA.BalleS. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16, 46–55. https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1175336
61.
Núñez-CanalM.de las Mercedes de ObessoM.Pérez-RiveroC. A. (2022). New challenges in higher education: A study of the digital competence of educators in COVID times. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121270
62.
NusairK.HuaN. (2010). Comparative assessment of structural equation modeling and multiple regression research methodologies : E-commerce context. Tourism Management, 31(3), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.010
63.
NusirS.AlsmadiI.Al-KabiM.SharadgahF. (2013). Studying the impact of using multimedia interactive programs on children’s ability to learn basic math skills. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.3.305
OttestadG.KelentricM.GuomundsdottirG. B. (2014). Professional digital competence in teacher education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-02
66.
PalaiologouI. (2016). Teachers’ dispositions towards the role of digital devices in play-based pedagogy in early childhood education. Early Years, 36(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1174816
StarkeyL. (2019). Three dimensions of student-centred education: a framework for policy and practice. Critical Studies in Education, 60(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1281829
69.
UNESCO (2016). Diverse approach to developing and implementing competency-based ICT training for teachers: A case study. https://tinyurl.com/2p9dw4kz
70.
UNICEF (2019). Digital literacy for children: Exploring definitions and frameworks. https://tinyurl.com/28jud7rz
71.
VermaJ. PSalamA. S. G. (2019). Testing statistical assumptions in research. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119528388
72.
WuD.ZhouC.LiY.ChenM. (2022). Factors associated with teachers’ competence to develop students’ information literacy: A multilevel approach. Computers & Education, 176, 104360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104360
73.
XiaY.YangY. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409–428. ttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
74.
ZabolotskaO.ZhyliakN.HevchukN.PetrenkoN.AliekoO. (2021). Digital competencies of teachers in the transformation of the educational environment. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.22094/JOIE.2020.677813
