After Janus : Teachers’ Unions,Walkouts,and Social Justice Unionism

Abstract

Recent union-supported teachers’ walkouts and strikes across several U.S. states and cities highlighted union-led and grassroots efforts to amplify teachers’ voices. Yet, the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, provides a strength test for teachers’ unions and members engaging in social justice/equity work within a post-Janus landscape. This article first explores traditional functions of teachers’ unions. Next, it examines Janus and potential consequences for union participation, teachers’ advocacy, and civil rights. Using a social justice lens, the article discusses how and why unions may need to consider strengthening “social justice unionism” by building on walkouts and strikes.

Keywords

teachers educational policy unions social justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abood v . Detroit Board of Education, 433 U.S. 915 (1977).

Antonnuci . (2018). Union report exclusive: Internal report shows NEA losses of 17,000 members and 87,000 fee payers since Janus decision. Retrived from https://www.the74million.org/article/union-report-exclusive-internal-report-shows-nea-losses-of-17000-members-and-87000-fee-payers-since-janus-decision/

Arizona

H.B.

2663

, 53rd Legislature, Second Regular Session. (AZ, 2018).

Bureau of Labor Statistics . (2018). Union Members—2017.Retrieved fromhttps://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf

Burns

. (2019, November 1). Chicago teachers didn’t win everything, but they’ve transformed the city and the labor movement. In These Times . https://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/22142/chicago-teachers-strike-lori-lightfoot- tentative-agreement

Crain

Matheny

. (2018). Labor unions, solidarity, and money. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 22(2), 259–298.

DeBray-Pelot

McGuinn

. (2009). The new politics of education: Analyzing the federal education policy landscape in the post-NCLB era. Educational Policy, 23(1), 15–42. doi: 10.1177/0895904808328524.

DiSalvo

. (2019). Public sector unions after Janus: An update. https://www.manhattan-institute.org/public-sector-unions-after-janus

Fantasia

Voss

. (2004). Hard work: Remaking the American labor movement. University of California Press.

10.

Fisk

C. L

. (2018). A progressive labor vision of the first amendment: Past as prologue. Columbia Law Review, 118(7), 2057–2094.

11.

Fisk

C. L.

Malin

M. H

. (2019). After Janus . California Law Review, 107, 1821–1876.

12.

Hartney

Flavin

. (2011). From the schoolhouse to the statehouse: Teacher Union political activism and U.S. state education reform policy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 11(3), 251–268. doi: 10.1177/1532440011413079

13.

Henig

J. R.

Lyon

M. A

. (2019). After the teacher walkouts: Will unions shift their focus to the statehouse? Education Next, 19(1), 52–60.

14.

Hodges

A. C

. (2012). Maintaining union resources in an era of public-sector bargaining retrenchment. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 16, 599–628.

15.

Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, ILL . Comp. Stat. 315/1-28, 2018.

16.

Janus v . American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, 851 F.3d 746 (7th Cir. 2017).

17.

Janus v . American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, 138 S.Ct. 2448 (2018).

18.

Knox v . Service Employees, 567 U.S. 298 (2012).

19.

Koppich

J. E

. (2005). A tale of two approaches—the AFT, the NEA, and NCLB. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 137–155.doi:10.1207/S15327930pje8002_8

20.

Loomis

. (2018). A history of America in ten strikes. The New Press.

21.

Malin

M. H

. (2009). The paradox of public sector labor law. Indiana Law Journal, 84(4), 1369–1399.

22.

Malin

M. H

. (2012). Sifting through the wreckage of the tsunami that hit public sector collective bargaining. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 16(2), 533–557.

23.

Manzo

Bruno

. (2018). After Janus: The Impending Effects on Public Sector Workers from a Decision Against Fair Share. Illinois Economic Policy Institute. https://illinoisepi.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/ilepi-pmcr-after-janus-final.pdf

24.

Milbank

. (2019, Jan. 25). So much for the labor movement’s funeral. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/so-much-for-the-labor-movements-funeral/2019/01/25/53e5389c-20c3-11e9-9145-3f74070bbdb9_story.html

25.

Montaño

López-Torres

DeLissovoy

Pacheco

Stillman

. (2002). Teachers as activists: Teacher development and alternate sites of learning. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(3), 265–275. doi: 10.1080/10665680290175275

26.

National Center for Education Statistics . (2012). Schools and staffing survey (SASS). Percentage distribution of public school districts by type of agreement with teachers’ associations or unions and state: 2011-12. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/tables/sass1112_2013311_d1s_007.asp#f2

27.

National Education Association . (2019). NEA-AFT partnership. http://www.nea.org/home/11204.htm

28.

National Labor Relations Act . 29 U.S.C. § 151-169, 2018.

29.

New Jersey Workplace Democracy Enhancement Act . S-2137/A-3686, 2018.

30.

North Carolina S.B. 99, 2017-2018 General Assembly; 2017-2018 Reg. Session (NC, 2018).

31.

70 Okl. St. Ann. § 18-114.14 (OK, 2018).

32.

Olson

. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.

33.

Peterson

. (1999). Survival and justice: Rethinking teacher union strategy. In Charney

Peterson

(Eds.), Transforming teacher unions: Fighting for better schools and social justice (pp. 11–19). Rethinking Schools.

34.

Pitts

. (2011). Black workers and the public sector. Research Brief. University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education. http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/pdf/2011/blacks_public_sector11.pdf

35.

Ray

D. E.

Sharpe

C. W.

Strassfeld

R. N

. (2019). Understanding labor law(5th ed.). Carolina Academic Press.

36.

Ross

. (2007). Varieties of social unionism: Towards a framework for comparison. Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, 11, 16–34.

37.

Shelton

. (2018). Teacher union in America: Lessons from the past for defending and deepening democracy. American Educator, (42) 30–40.

38.

Slater

. (2018, Jun. 29). Janus: Damaging Labor, The Jurist . https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2018/06/joseph-slater-impact-janus/

39.

Stahulak v . The City of Chicago, 184 Ill.2d 176, 234 Ill.Dec. 432 (1998).

40.

State of Maryland, Office of the Attorney General . (2018). General guidance on the rights and duties of public-sector workers and employers after Janus. http://www.marylandattorneygeneral.gov/news%20documents/After_Janus.pdf

41.

Strassfeld

N. M

. (2019). Preparing pre-service special education teachers to facilitate parent involvement, knowledge, and advocacy: Considerations for curriculum. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(4), 283–296.doi:10.1177/0888406418806643

42.

Strunk

K. O.

Grissom

J. A

. (2010). Do strong unions shape district policies? Collective bargaining, teacher contract restrictiveness, and the political power of teachers’ unions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(3), 389–406.

43.

Superfine

B. M.

Woo

D. S

. (2018). Teacher unions, charter schools, and the public/private distinction in education law and policy. Teachers College Record, 120(10), 1–28.

44.

Tang

. (2019). Life after Janus. Columbia Law Review, 119(3), 677–762.

45.

Wade

M. M

. (2018). Targeting teachers while shielding cops? The politics of punishing enemies and rewarding friends in American state collective bargaining reform agendas. Journal of Labor and Society, 21(2), 137–157.doi:10.1111/wusa.12338

46.

Weiner

. (2012). The future of our schools: Teacher unions and social justice. Haymarket Books.

47.

18A W. Va. Code Art. 4-2 (WV, 2018).