This paper aims to report a case study of exploring the effect of “assessment for learning” on improving student learning and facilitating teachers’ professional development in the examination-oriented context of Hong Kong. By adopting Variation Theory of the Lesson Study approach, data were collected through pre- and post-tests, interviews with students and teacher participants and observation field-notes in order to help diagnose students’ learning difficulties and provide evidence for teachers to refine their teaching strategies to enhance students’ learning effectiveness. The students’ improvement in learning performance informed the teacher participants of the usefulness of ‘assessment for learning’ in the classroom.
BerryR. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 199–211.doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.527701
4.
BlackP.HarrisonC.LeeC.MarshallB.WiliamD. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Open University Press.
5.
BlackP.WiliamD. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
6.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2006). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.
7.
CarlessD. (2010). Classroom assessment in the Hong Kong policy context. Inpp.McGawB.BakerE.PetersonP. (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (pp.438–442). Elsevier.
CoghlanD. (2019). Doing action research in your own organization. Sage.
10.
CohenL.ManionL. (2000). Research methods in education. Routledge.
11.
Curriculum Development Council. (2009). Senior secondary curriculum guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong Government.
12.
DayC. (2004). Passionate learning communities. Inpp.DayC. (Ed.), A passion for teaching (pp.134–157). Routledge Falmer.
13.
EarlL. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.
14.
ElliottJ.TsaiC. (2008). What might Confucius have to say about action research?Educational Action Research, 16(4), 569–578.doi:10.1080/09650790802445759
15.
FullanM. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
16.
GardnerJ. (2012). Assessment and learning: Introduction. InGardnerJ. (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed.,pp.1–9). Sage.
17.
GhayeA.GhayeK. (1998). Teaching and learning through critical reflective practice. David Fulton.
18.
GuskeyT. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.doi:10.1080/135406002100000512
19.
HargreavesE. (2005). Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 213–224.doi:10.1080/03057640500146880
20.
HargreavesE. (2018). Using action research to explore the role of the international academic consultant: drawing on participants’ perceptions in a teacher development project in Pakistan. Teacher Development, 22(1), 1–15.doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1298534
21.
HarlenW. (2005). Teachers' summative practices and assessment for learning – Tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223.doi:10.1080/09585170500136093
22.
HarlenW. (2007). Assessment for learning. Sage.
23.
HattieJ.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.doi:10.3102/003465430298487
24.
HollowayK.LongR. (1998). Teacher development and school improvement: The use of ‘shared practice groups’ to improve teaching in primary schools. Journal of In-Service Education, 24(3), 535–545.doi:10.1080/13674589800200056
25.
Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2020). Territory-wide system assessment. Accessed 27 February 2020. http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/en/bca_tsa/.
26.
KentA. M. (2004). Improving teacher quality through professional development. Education, 124(3), 427–435.
27.
KoP. Y. (2007). Interpreting differences in learning in terms of differences in the pattern of variation and invariance in teaching – the Hong Kong learning study. Journal of the Nagoya University, 3, 1–15.
28.
KoP. Y. (2011). Critical conditions for pre-service teachers’ learning through inquiry – The learning study approach in Hong Kong. The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1, 49–66.
29.
KriewaldtJ. (2012). Reorienting teaching standards: Learning from lesson study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 31–41.doi:10.1080/1359866X.2011.643761
30.
LeahyS.WiliamD. (2012). From teachers to schools: Scaling up professional development for formative assessment. InGardnerJ. (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp.51–69). Sage.
31.
LeeC.WiliamD. (2005). Studying changes in the practice of two teachers developing assessment for learning. Teacher Development, 9(2), 265–283.doi:10.1080/13664530500200244
32.
LewisC.PerryR.HurdJ. (2004). A deeper look at lesson study. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 18–23.
33.
LewisC.PerryR.MurataA. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.doi:10.3102/0013189X035003003
34.
LimC.LeeC.SaitoE.Syed HaronS. (2011). Taking stock of lesson study as a platform for teacher development in Singapore. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 353–365.doi:10.1080/1359866X.2011.614683
35.
LoM. L.PongW. Y.ChikP. P. M. (2005). For each and everyone - Catering for individual differences through learning study. University of Hong Kong.
36.
LornaE. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. Corwin Press.
37.
MorrisP.LoM. L.ChikP. M.ChanK. K. (2000). One function, two systems: Changing assessment in Hong Kong’s primary schools. InAdamsonB.KwanT.ChanK. K. (Eds.), Changing the curriculum: The impact of reform on Hong Kong’s primary schools (pp.195–215). Hong Kong University Press.
38.
StigginsR. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.doi:10.1177/003172170508700414
39.
StollL.BolamR.McMahonA.WallaceM.ThomasS. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
40.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
41.
TylerR. W. (1942). General statement on evaluation. The Journal of Educational Research, 35(7), 492–501.doi:10.1080/00220671.1942.10881106
42.
ValiandesS.NeophytouL. (2018). Teachers’ professional development for differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms: investigating the impact of a development program on teachers’ professional learning and on students’ achievement. Teacher Development, 22(1), 123–138.doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1338196
43.
WiliamD.LeeC.HarrisonC.BlackP. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65.doi:10.1080/0969594042000208994
44.
WongM. W. (2007). Assessment for learning and teacher development: The experience of three Hong Kong teachers. Teacher Development, 11(3), 295–312.doi:10.1080/13664530701644599
45.
YinR. K. (1989). Case study research, design and methods. Sage.
