A research study was designed and conducted to identify effective school characteristics and strategies of high-performing, high-poverty schools. Four High-Performing Reward schools in South Texas that demonstrated longitudinal academic success were selected to study. We developed an 11 effective school characteristics model including school processes from the effective school research literature as the framework for the study. A mixed-research study was designed to collect data from professional school staff, and principals related to the 11 effective characteristics, their processes, and strategies used by the schools. An area of improvement identified among these already high-performing schools was parental engagement.
AliR.JeraldC. D. (2001). Dispelling the myth in California: Preliminary findings from a state and nationwide analysis of "high-flying" schools. Oakland, CA: The Education Trust-West. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED462484.pdf.
BarthP.HaycockK.JacksonH.MoraK.RuizP.RobinsonS.WilkinsA.. (Eds.). (1999). Dispelling the myth: High poverty schools exceeding expectations. Washington, DC: Education Trust. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED445140).
4.
BlanksteinA. M. (2004). Failure is not an option. Six principles that guide student achievement in high-performing schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
CarterS. C. (2000). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high-performing, high-poverty schools. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
6.
ColemanJ. S.CampbellE. Q.HobsonC. J.McPartlandJ.MoodA. M.WeinfeldF. D.YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
7.
D'AmicoJ. (1982). Using effective schools studies to create effective schools: No recipes yet. Educational Leadership, 40(3), 60.
8.
EdmondsR. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. education leadership. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15.
9.
GainerW. J. (1989). Schools programs their extent and characteristics. Washington: General Accounting Office. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/80/77488.pdf.
10.
HattieJ. A. C. (2009). Visible learning a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York City: Routledge.
JansenJ. D. (1995). Effective schools?Comparative Education, 31(2), 181–200.
13.
JensenE. (2009). Teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids' brains and what schools can do about it. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
14.
KannapelP. J.ClementsS. K. (2005). A report of the prichard committee for academic excellence inside the black box of high-performing high-poverty schools. Lexington, KY. Retrieved from http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/highperforminghighpoverty.pdf.
15.
LauerP. A. (2001). Preliminary findings on the characteristics of teacher learning in high-performing high-needs schools (ERIC: ED462485).
16.
LeinL.Johnson Jr.J. F.RaglandM. (1997). Successful texas schoolwide programs: Research study results. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center.
17.
LezotteL. (1982). A response to D’Amico: Not a recipe but a framework. Educational Leadership, 40(3).
18.
LezotteL. W.BancroftB. (1985). Growing use of the effective schools model for school improvement. Educational Leadership, 42(6). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1290156157/.
19.
MaleckiC. K.DemarayM. K. (2006). Social support as a buffer in the relationship between socioeconomic status and academic performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(4), 375–395.doi:10.1037/h0084129
20.
MarzanoR. J. (2003). What works in schools translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
21.
McGeeG. W. (2004). Closing the achievement gap: Lessons from Illinois' golden spike High-Poverty High-Performing schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9(2), 97–125. Retrieved from http://ecadmin.wdfiles.com/local--files/at-risk-children-families/Closing%20Gap%20-%20Illinois%20Golden.pdfdoi:10.1207/s15327671espr0902_2
22.
MooreheadG.GriffenR. W. (1992). Organizational behavior. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
23.
MortimoreP.SammonsP.StollL.LewisD.EcobR. (1989). A study of effective junior schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 753–768.doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90026-8
24.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016a). Digest of National Statics 2015: Table 102.40: Poverty rates for all persons and poverty status of 5- to 17-year-olds, by region and state: Selected years, 1990 through 2014. Washington: US Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_102.40.asp.
NeufeldB.FarrarE.MilesM. B. (1983). A review of effective schools research: the message for secondary schools. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education. (ED228241).
PassalaquaJ. (1981). The school social organization: suggestions for change. InThe generator (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: The American Educational Research Association.
29.
PurkeyS. C.SmithM. S. (1982). Too soon to cheer? synthesis of research on effective schools. Educational Leadership, 40(3), 64–68. Retrieved from http://ezhost.utrgv.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=8518907&site=ehost-live.
30.
PurkeyS. C.SmithM. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427–452. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1290293330/.doi:10.1086/461325
31.
RaglandM. A.ClubineB.ConstableD.SmithP. A. (2002). Expecting success: A study of five high performing, high poverty schools. Washington: Council of Chief State School Officers. (ED468010).
32.
ReardonS. F. (2011). Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
ReidK.HopkinsD.HollyP. (1987). Towards the effective school: The problems and some solutions. New York City, NY: Simon & Schuster Education.
34.
ReynoldsD. (1976). The delinquent school. InHammersleyM.WoodsP. (Eds.), The process of schooling (pp.78–95). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35.
RutterM.MaughanB.MortimoreP.OustonJ. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schooIs and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00124-3
ScheerensJ. (2013). What is effective schooling? A review of current thought and practice. Netherlands: International Baccalaureate Organization.
38.
ScheerensJ. (2015). Theories on educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 10–31.doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.858754
39.
ScheerensJ.StoelWGR. (1988). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Development of Theories of School-Effectiveness, New Orleans, LA. (ED296006).
40.
ScottW. R. (1992). Organizations rational, natural, and open systems (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
ShannonG. S.BylsmaP. (2007). The nine characteristics of high-performing schools: A research-based resource for schools and districts to assist with improving student learning (2nd ed.). Olympia, WA: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.k12.wa.us/research/pubdocs/NineCharacteristics.pdf.
42.
SmithD.TomlinsonS. (1989). The school effect: A study of multi-racial comprehensives. London: Policy Studies Institute.
43.
TeddlieC.StringfieldS.DesselleS. (1985). Methods, history, selected findings and recommendations from the Louisiana school effectiveness study, 1980-85. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20(2), 22–30.
Texas Education Agency. (2000). The Texas Successful Schools Study: Quality Education for Limited English Proficient Students. Austin, TX. (ED479179).
51.
Texas Education Agency. (2015). Reward Schools Case Study Project. Austin, TX.
52.
Texas Education Agency. (2016). Department of Assessment and Accountability [TEA DAA], 2016. Austin, TX. Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/perfreport/
