School choice in the United States can be traced back to the start of civil society when wealthy families selected a school based on educational philosophy, location, or religious tradition. As common schools emerged, larger portions of the population were able to gain access to education. However, many discovered that quality public schools were not a reality for all students. In response, some looked to school choices within and outside of the public school sector. This literature review chronicles school choice efforts to emerge following the 1954 Brown decision and highlights liberal and conservative political heritages of school choice in the United States.
AbdulkadiroğluA., PathakP. A., RothA. E., & SönmezT. (2006). Changing the Boston school choice mechanism (NBER Working Paper No. 11965). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11965
3.
AbdulkadiroğluA., PathakP. A., RothA. E., & SönmezT. (2005). The Boston public school match. American Economic Review, 95(2), 368–371. doi:10.1257/000282805774669637
4.
AhnJ. (2011). Policy, technology, and practice in cyber charter schools: Framing the issues. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 1–26.
5.
BarbourM. K. (2013). The landscape of K–12 online learning: Examining what is known. In MooreM. G. (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed.) (pp. 574–593). New York: Routledge.
6.
BarbourM. K., & ReevesT. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402–416. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.009
7.
BatdorffM., MaloneyL., MayJ., DoyleD, & HasselB. (2010). Charter school funding: Inequity persists.Muncie, IN: Ball State University.
8.
BathonJ. (2011). Model legislation related to online learning opportunities for students in public elementary and secondary education schools.Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/NEPC-VirtSchool-2-LB-Bathon.pdf
9.
BerendsM. (2015). Sociology and school choice: What we know after two decades of charter schools. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 159–180. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340
10.
BuddeR. (1996). The evolution of the charter concept. Phi Delta Kappa, 78(1), 72–73.
11.
Carr-ChellmanA. A. (2009). An introduction to this special issue of TechTrends. TechTrends, 53(4), 3–4.
ChubbJ., & MoeT. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
14.
CostrellR. M. (2009). Who gains, who loses?: The fiscal impact of the Milwaukee parental choice program. Education Next, 9(1), 62–69.
15.
CostrellR. M. (2010). The fiscal impact of the Milwaukee parental choice program: 2010–2011 update and policy options (School Choice Demonstration Project Milwaukee Evaluation Report #22). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518596.pdf
16.
DarrowR. (2010). A comparative study between online charter high schools and traditional high schools in California. (Unpublished Dissertation). California State University, Fresno, CA.
17.
DuncanA. (2009, June). Turning around the bottom 5 percent. Speech presented at the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools Conference.
ErbR. E. (2004). From traditional public school to cyber charter: How parents decide. (Unpublished Dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
20.
EuchnerC., & McGovernS. (2003). Education and the ladder of mobility. In Urban policy reconsidered: Dialogues on the problems and prospects of American cities (pp. 185–238). New York: Routledge.
21.
FinnC.Jr. (2005). Sound and unsound options for reform. Academic Questions, 18(1), 79–86.
22.
FinnC.Jr., MannoB., & VanourekG. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
FliegelS., & MacGuireJ. (1993). Miracle in East Harlem: The fight for choice in public education.New York: Times Books.
FullerB. (2000). The public square, big or small? Charter schools in political context. In FullerB. (Ed.), Inside charter schools: The paradox of radical decentralization (pp. 13–65). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
GlassG. V., & WelnerK. G. (2011). Online K–12 schooling in the U.S.: Uncertain private ventures in need of public regulation.Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice website: http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Glass_VirtualLearning2011.pdf
34.
GraubardA. (1972). Free the children: Radical reform and the free school movement.New York: Pantheon Books.
Hinman-SmithD. (1993). Does the word freedom have a meaning? The Mississippi freedom schools, the Berkley free speech movement, and the search for freedom though education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
39.
HuertaL., & D'EntremontC. (2007). Education tax credits in the post-Zelman era: Legal, political and policy alternatives to vouchers?Education Policy, 21(1), 73–109.
40.
JencksC. (1966). Is the public school obsolete?The Public Interest, 2, 18–27.
41.
JencksC. (1969). Private schools for black children. Education Digest, 34(7), 1–4.
KaneP., & WilsonT. (2006). Revitalizing our public mission: Lessons of school choice. Independent School, 65(3), 26–30, 32–33.
46.
KleinC. (2006). Virtual charter schools and home schooling.Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.
47.
KnaakW. C., & KnaakJ. T. (2013). Charter schools: Educational reform or failed initiative?Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 79(4), 45–53.
48.
KolderieT. (1990). Beyond choice to new public schools: Withdrawing the exclusive franchise in public education (Policy Report No. 8). Retrieved from ERIC Database: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED327914.pdf
LevinH. M. (1998). Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(3), 373–392. doi:10.1002/(SICI)15206688(199822) 17:3<373::AID-PAM1>3.0.CO;2-D
52.
LinesP. M. (2000). Home schooling comes of age. The Public Interest, 140, 74–86.
53.
LoganS. R. (2009). The impact of charter schools on the budget, operations, and educational services of Columbus city schools. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (3365792)
MecklenburgerJ. (1972). Vouchers at Alum Rock. Phi Delta Kappan, 54(1), 23–25. Miller, R. (2002). Free schools, free people: Education and democracy after the 1960s. New York: State University of New York Press.
56.
MondaleS., & PattonS. B. (Eds.). (2001). School: The story of American public education.Boston: Beacon Press.
57.
NathanJ. (1992). Eight myths about school choice. Clearing House, 66(2), 71–74. doi:10.1080/00098655.1992.9955933
58.
NathanJ. (1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
NiY. (2009). The impact of charter schools on the efficiency of traditional public schools: Evidence in Michigan. Economics of Education Review28(5), 571–584. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.01.003
65.
No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2002).
66.
OzekU. (2009). Effects of open enrollment on school choice and student outcomes (Working Paper No. 26). Retrieved from Urban Institute website: http://www.urban.org/publications/1001301.html
67.
OrfieldG., KucseraJ., & Siegel-HawleyG. (2012). E pluribus … separation: Depending double segregation for more students.Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project.
68.
PayneC. (1997). Education for activism: Mississippi's freedom schools in the 1960s. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED410653)
69.
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007).
70.
PattersonJ. (2001). The truth about school choice. Curriculum Administrator, 37(1), 38–42.
71.
PerlsteinD. (1990). Teaching freedom: SNCC and the creation of the Mississippi freedom schools. History of Education Quarterly, 30(3), 297–324.
72.
PetersonP. E. (2010). Saving schools: From Horace Mann to virtual learning.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
PiphoC. (1998). The evolution of school choice. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(4), 261–262.
RebackR. (2008). Demand and supply in an inter-district public school choice program. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 402–416. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.01.001
76.
RevenaughM. (2005). K–8 virtual schools: A glimpse into the future. Learning in the Digital Age, 63(4), 60–64.
77.
RidenourC. S., LasleyT. J.II, & BainbridgeW. L. (2001). The impact of emerging market-based public policy on urban schools and a democratic society. Education and Urban Society, 34(1), 66–83. doi:10.1177/0013124501341005
78.
RossellC. (2005). Magnet school: No longer famous, but still intact. Education Next, 5, 44–49.
79.
RushingW. (2001). Inequality and education reform: Formulating a macro-historical sociology perspective. Race Ethnicity and Education, 4(1), 29–44. doi:10.1080/713693049
80.
SaporitoS. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50(2), 181–203.
81.
SaporitoS., & SohoniD. (2007). Mapping educational inequality: Concentrations of poverty among poor and minority students in public schools. Social Forces, 85(3), 1227–1254.
82.
SmithA. G. (1995). Public choice and open enrollment: Implications for education, desegregation, and equity. Journal of Law and Education, 23(2), 147–94.
83.
SmrekarC., & GoldringE. (1999). School choice in urban America: Magnet schools and the pursuit of equity.New York: Teachers College Press.
84.
SnellL. (2005). Defining the education market: Reconsidering charter schools. Cato Journal, 25(2), 267–277.
85.
SpringJ. (1997). The American school 1642–1996.Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies.
86.
StewartB. (2002). Charter schools: Opportunities to extend models, a positive view. Education, 122(4), 777–784.
87.
StullichS., EisnerE., & McCraryJ. (2007). National Assessment of Title I: Final Report (NCEE 2008–4012). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20084012/
88.
SugarmanS., & KemererF. (Eds.). (1999). School choice and social controversy: Politics, policy, and law.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
89.
SweetlandS. R. (2002). Theory into practice: Free markets and public schooling. The Clearing House, 76(1), 8–12.
90.
TegelerP., & Siegel-HawleyG. (2015, March). Linking housing and school integration policy: What federal, state, and local governments can do (Issue Brief No. 5). Washington, DC: National Coalition on School Diversity and Poverty & Race Research Action Council.
ViterittiJ. P., WalbergH. J., & WolfP. J. (2005). School choice: How an abstract idea became a political reality. Brookings Papers on Educational Policy, 8, 137–173.
94.
VopatM. C. (2011). Magnet schools: Innate talent and social justice. Theory and Research in Education, 9(1), 59–72. doi:10.1177/1477878510394811
95.
WalterS. (1999). Free schools movement. In AltenbaughR. J. (Ed.) Historical dictionary of American education (pp. 145). Wesport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
96.
WatersL. H., BarbourM. K., & MechacaM. P. (2014). The nature of online charter schools: Evolution and emerging concerns. Education Technology and Society, 17(4), 379–389.
97.
WatsonJ., MurinA., VashawL., GeminB., & RappC. (2012). Keeping pace within K-12 online and blended learning: An annual review of policy and practice.Evergreen, CO: Evergreen Education Group.
98.
WitteJ. F. (1998). The Milwaukee voucher experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(4), 229–251.
