The purpose of the study was to examine 1466 school principals’ opinions on six different aspects of counseling practices in K-12 public and private schools. Results indicated that there were significant differences between public and private school principals’ opinions on school counseling priorities, perceptions, academic development, and program management. School type and school-level interactions were significant for career and academic development and marginally significant for personal–social development. School level had also significant main effects on personal–social, career, and academic developments. These results may be of value to school leaders and educators concerned with improving student achievement and school effectiveness through revising and improving their school counseling services.
American School Counselor Association. (2012). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (3rd edition). Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
AslanM., & BakirA. A. (2014). Resmi ve özel okul öğretmenlerinin paylaşılan liderliğe ilişkin görüşleri.İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1).
3.
BaileyD. B. (2001). Evaluating parent involvement and family support in early intervention and preschool programs.Journal of Early intervention, 24(1), 1–14.
4.
BaşaranM. (2008). İköğretim okullarındaki yönetici ve sınıf rehber öğretmenlerininpsikolojik danışma ve rehberlik faaliyetlerinden beklentileri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul
5.
BergerS. L. (2014). College planning for gifted students: Choosing and getting into the right college.Sourcebooks, Inc.
6.
BraunH., JenkinsF., & GriggW. (2006). Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. NCES 2006-461.National Center for Education Statistics.
7.
BruceM., & BridgelandJ. (2012). 2012 National Survey of School Counselors: True North—Charting the Course to College and Career Readiness.College Board Advocacy & Policy Center.
8.
BurnhamJ. J., & JacksonC. M. (2000). School Counselor Roles: Discrepancies between Actual Practice and Existing Models.Professional school counseling, 4(1), 41–49.
9.
CamadanF., & SezginF. (2012). İköğretim Okulu Müdürlerinin Okul Rehberlik Hizmetlerine İişkin Görüşleri Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma.Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(38), 199–211.
10.
CarrellS. E., & CarrellS. A. (2006). Do lower student to counselor ratios reduce school disciplinary problems?.The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1).
11.
CatesJ. T., & SchaefleS. E. (2011). The relationship between a college preparation program and at-risk students’ college readiness.Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(4), 320–334.
12.
ChubbJ. E., & MoeT. M. (1990). America's public schools: Choice is a panacea.The Brookings Review, 8(3), 4–12.
13.
College Board, American School Counselor Association, & National Association of Secondary School Principals (2009). A closer look at the principal-counselor relationship a survey of principals and counselors.Authors: New York.
14.
ColemanJ., HofferT., & KilgoreS. (1982). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools.Sociology of Education, 65–76.
15.
CoskunM., ZorogluS., & GhaziuddinN. (2012): Suicide Rates among Turkish and American Youth: A Cross-Cultural Comparison, Archives of Suicide Research, 16:1, 59–72
16.
DahirC., BurnhamJ., StoneC., & CobbN. (2010). Principal as partners and counselors as collaborators.NASSP Bulletin, v. 94(4), 286–305.
17.
DahirC. A., & StoneC. B. (2003). Accountability: A MEASURE of the impact school counselors have on student achievement.Professional School Counseling, 6(3), 214–221.
18.
DahirC. A., & StoneC. B. (2012). The transformed school counselor, (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19.
DavisT. E. (2014). Exploring school counseling.Cengage Learning.
20.
DoganS. (2000). The historical development of counseling in Turkey.International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 22(1), 57–67.
21.
GlennE. E. (1998). Counseling children and adolescents with disabilities.Professional School Counseling, 2(1).
22.
Goodman-ScottE., Betters-BubonJ., & DonohueP. (2015). Aligning Comprehensive School Counseling Programs and Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports to Maximize School Counselors’ Efforts.Professional School Counseling, 19(1), 57–67.
23.
GreeleyA. M. (1982). Catholic high schools and minority students.Transaction Publishers.
24.
GreeneJ. P. (2000). The effect of school choice: An evaluation of the charlotte children's scholarship fund program.Civic Report, 12, 1–15.
25.
GysbersN. C., & HendersonP. (2001). Comprehensive guidance and counseling programs: A rich history and a bright future.Personnel and Guidance Journal, 53, 647–652.
26.
HendersonP., & GysbersN. C. (2006). Providing administrative and counseling supervision for school counselors.VISTAS: Compelling perspectives on counseling, 161–163.
27.
Holcomb-McCoyC. (2011). A smoother transition for black teens.Educational Leadership, 68(7), 59–63.
28.
HookerS., & BrandB. (2009, October). Success at Every Step: How 23 Programs Support Youth on the Path to College and beyond. InAmerican Youth Policy Forum. American Youth Policy Forum. 1836 Jefferson Place NW, Washington, DC 20036.
29.
JansonC., & MilitelloM. (2009). Where do we go from here? Eight elements of effective school counselor-principal relationships. In ConnollyF., & ProtheroeN. (Eds.), The school principal field manual for working with counselors (pp. 159–164). Washington, DC: Educational Research Service and Naviance, Inc.
30.
KafkaJ. (2009). The principalship in historical perspective.Peabody Journal of Education, 84(3), 318–330.
31.
KaganM. (2010). Research on school counselors’ job satisfactions working at state and private elementary schools, and guidance and research centers in Ankara.Journal of Education Faculty, 12(1), 39–55.
32.
KaratasZ., & BaltaciH.Ş. (2013). Ortaöğretim Kurumlarında Yürütülen Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Hizmetlerine Yönelik Okul Müdürü, Sınıf Rehber Öğretmeni, Öğrenci ve Okul Rehber Öğretmeninin (Psikolojik Danışman) Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi.Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2).
33.
LapanT. R. (2012). Comprehensive School Counseling Programs: In Some Schools for Some Students But Not in All Schools for All Students.Professional School Counseling, 16(2), doi: 10.5330/PSC.n.2012–16.84.
LotkowskiV. A., RobbinsS. B., & NoethR. J. (2004). The Role of Academic and Non-Academic Factors in Improving College Retention. ACT Policy Report.American College Testing ACT Inc.
36.
LubienskiS. T., & LubienskiC. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematicsdata. AERA, 43(4), 651–698.
37.
MyrickR. D. (2003). Accountability: Counselors count.Professional School Counseling, 6(3), 174–179.
38.
National Office for School Counselor Advocacy. (2010). Eight components for college and career readiness. In Martin, P. (p. 6). New York, NY: College Board.
39.
OwenD., CayirdagN, YalinD., & Demirli YorazA., (2015). Western Counseling Models in Modern Turkey [Modern Türkiye'de Batılı Psikolojik Danışma Modelleri]. In KurterF., & MattisJ.S. (Eds.) Practitioners’ View of Multi-Culturism in Turkey, (pp. 87–113), Istanbul: Bahcesehir University Press.
40.
ÖzabacıN, SakaryaN, & DoganM. (2008). The evaluation of the school administrators’ thoughts about the counseling and guidance services in their own schools.Balıkesir University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 11(19), 8–22.
41.
PernaL. W., & TitusM. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences.Journal of Higher Education, 485–518.
42.
PernaL. W., & ThomasS. L. (2008). Theoretical perspectives on student success: Understanding the contributions of the disciplines (Vol. 34). San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals
43.
PonecD. L., & BrockB. L. (2000). Relationships among elementary school counselors and principals: A unique bond.Professional School Counseling, 3(3), 208.
44.
SextonT. L. (1999). Evidence-based counseling: Implications for counseling practice, preparation, and professionalism.Clearinghouse on Counseling and Student Services.
45.
SulkuaS. N., & AbdioglubZ. (2015). Public and Private School Distinction, Regional Development Differences, and Other Factors Influencing the Success of Primary School Students in Turkey.Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2, 419–431.
46.
StocktonR., & GüneriO. Y. (2011). Counseling in Turkey: An evolvingfield. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(1), 98–104.
47.
TaşkayaS. M., & KurtY. (2010). The opinions of primary school teachers about school guidance services at primary schools. InPaper was presented at the International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya, Turkey.
48.
The Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education (2009), The Roles and Responsibilities of Psychological Counselor and Guidance, Official Communications journal, Ankara.
49.
The Council of Higher Education (2014). Higher Education System in Turkey, Ankara.
50.
UltanisEmel (2005). Türkiye'de Psikolojik Danisma ve Rehberlik (PDR) Meslegi vePsikolojik Danisman Egitimi, Mersin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayi 1, Haziran 2005, ss. 102–111.
51.
WiliamD. (2010). Standardized testing and school accountability.Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 107–122.
52.
WilkersonK., PérusseR., & HughesA. (2013). Comprehensive school counseling-programs and student achievement outcomes: A comparative analysis of RAMP versus non-RAMP schools.Professional School Counseling, 16(3), 172–184.
53.
YavuzOlcay (2014). Yavuz, O. (2014). Improving college readiness, pursuit, access and persistence of disadvantaged students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses data base. (UMI No. 3637774)
54.
YavuzOlcay (2016). Exploring the Impacts of School Reforms on Underrepresented Urban Students’ College Persistence.Educational Research and Evaluation. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2016.1261715.
