This article critiques post-Brown educational reforms for Black children by examining what effects post-Brown educational reform efforts had on Black children. To frame the discussion, post-Brown is defined as the broad ideology that desegregation was supposed to improve education for Black children. This analysis explores how and why Brown came about. Next, post-Brown educational reforms and their impact on Black children are examined. These post-Brown reforms include charter schools, voucher programs, magnet schools, homeschooling, and special education programs.
BlanchettW. J., MumfordV., & BeachumF. (2005). Urban school failure and disproportionality in a post-Brown era benign neglect of the constitutional rights of students of color.Remedial and Special Education,26(2), 70–81.
BlankR., LevineR., & SteelL. (1996). After 15 years: Magnet schools in urban education. In FullerB., & ElmoreR. F. (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (chap. 8). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
BrownF. (1994). Brown and educational policy making at 40.Journal of Negro Education,63(3), 336–348.
10.
BrownF. (2005). African Americans and school leadership: An introduction.Educational Administration Quarterly,41, 651–674.
11.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
12.
CarnoyM., JacobsenR., MishelL., & RothsteinR. (2005). The charter school dust-up.Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
13.
ClotfelterC. T. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
DantleyM. (2005). African American spirituality and Cornel West's notions of prophetic pragmatism: Restructuring educational leadership in American urban schools.Educational Administration Quarterly,41, 651–674.
DrameE. R. (2002). Sociocultural context effects on teachers’ readiness to refer for learning disabilities.Exceptional Children,69(1), 41–53.
17.
FrankenbergE., & LeeC. (2003). Charter schools and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education.Education Policy Analysis Archives,11(32), 1–48.
18.
FrankenbergE., & OrfieldG. (2012). The resegregation of suburban schools: A hidden crisis in American education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
19.
FratturaE., & CapperC. (2007). Leading for social justice.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
20.
GamoranA. (1996). Do magnet schools boost achievement?Educational Leadership,54(2), 42–46.
HarryB., & AndersonM. G. (1994). The disproportionate placement of African American males in special education programs: A critique of the process.Journal of Negro Education,63(4), 602–619.
24.
HorsfordS. D., & McKenzieK. B. (2008). “Sometimes I feel like the problems started with desegregation”: Exploring Black superintendent perspectives on desegregation policy.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,21, 443–455.
25.
Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District. 339 F. Supp. 1315 (N.D. Cal. 1971).
26.
KnowlesJ. G., MarlowS. E., & MuchmoreJ. A. (1992). From pedagogy to ideology: Origins and phases of home education in the United States, 1970–1990.American Journal of Education,100(2), 195–235.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2004). Landing on the wrong note: The price we paid for Brown.Educational Researcher,33(7), 3–13.
29.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools.Educational Researcher,35(7), 3–12.
30.
Larry P. v Riles, 495 F. Supp. 926-Dist.Court (N.D. Cal. 1979).
31.
LitwackL. (1998). Trouble in mind.New York, NY: Vintage Books.
32.
LosenD., & OrfieldG. (2002). Racial inequality in special education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
33.
LubienskiC. A., & WeitzelP. C. (2010). The charter school experiment: Expectations, evidence and implications.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
34.
MironG., UrschelJ. L., & SaxtonN. (2011). What makes KIPP work? A study of student characteristics, attrition, and school finance.Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.
35.
National Association for the Education of African American Children With Learning Differences. (n.d.). The problem. Retrieved from http://www.aacld.org/theproblem.html
36.
National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. (2009). 1.5 million homeschooled in the United States. Retrieved June 25, 2015, from National Center for Education Statistics Website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009030.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Charter school enrollment. Retrieved June 25, 2015, from National Center for Education Statistics Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgb.asp
39.
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 127 (2007).
40.
PattonJ. M. (1998). The disproportionate representation of African Americans in special education looking behind the curtain for understanding and solutions.The Journal of Special Education,32(1), 25–31.
Van DunkE., & DickmanA. M. (2003). School choice and the question of accountability: The Milwaukee experience.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
ViterittiJ. (2001). Choosing equality: School choice, the constitution, and civil society.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
48.
Voters Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973–1973bb-1 (1968).
49.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Education Information Services. (2013). Private schools register for Wisconsin Choice Program [Press release]. Retrieved from http://dpi.wi.gov/files/eis/pdf/dpinr2013_91.pdf
50.
Wisconsin v. Yoder. 406 U.S. 205 (1972).
51.
WilliamsH. A. (2007). Self-taught: African American education in slavery and in freedom.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
52.
WolfeA. (Ed.). (2003). School choice: The moral debate.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
