Whereas collective learning has mostly been centered on detecting and solving problems and overcoming failures, this study explores U.S. and Israeli teachers’ perceptions of the determinants of collective learning from faculty members’ successful practices. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews with 35 U.S. and 61 Israeli elementary, middle, and high school teachers. Data analysis revealed the following determinants of collective learning from successes: the management role, differing definitions of success, disciplinary division, and the learning culture. Implications for generating collective learning in schools, as well as future possible research avenues, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanR., & Maslin-OstrowskiP. (2002). The wounded leader: How real leadership emerges in times of crisis.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AndrewsD., & LewisM. (2002). The experience of a professional community: Teachers developing a new image of themselves and their workplace.Educational Research,44(3), 237–254.
3.
ArgyrisC. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
BaumardP., & StarbuckW. H. (2005). Learning from failures: Why it may not happen.Long Range Planning,38(3), 281–298.
6.
Ben-David-HadarI., & ZidermanA. (2011). A new model for equitable and efficient resource allocation to schools: The Israeli case.Education Economics,19(4), 341–362.
7.
BrooksJ. S., PlacierM., & CockrellK. S. (2003, November). Exploring the dark side of school reform: Teacher professional community and anomie. Paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Portland, OR.
8.
CameronK., DuttonJ., & QuinnR. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline.San-Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
9.
CharmazK. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructive methods. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 249–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CohenL., ManionL., & MorrisonK. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
11.
CoperriderD. L., SorensenP. F., & WhitneyD. (Eds.). (2000). Appreciative inquiry: Rethinking human organization toward a positive theory of change.Champaign, IL: Stipes.
12.
CrowtherF., HannL., McMasterJ., & FergusonM. (2000, April). Leadership for successful school revitalization: Lessons from recent Australian research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
13.
EllisS., & DavidiI. (2005). After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experiences.Journal of Applied Psychology,90(5), 857–871.
14.
EllisS., MendelR., & NirM. (2006). Learning from successful and failed experience: The moderating role of kind of after-event review.Journal of Applied Psychology,91(3), 669–680.
15.
FlickU. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
FullanM. (2000). The three stories of educational reform.Phi Delta Kappan,81(8), 581–584.
17.
GilesC., & HargreavesA. (2006). The sustainability of schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standard-based reform.Educational Administration Quarterly,42(1), 124–156.
18.
GinoF., & PisanoG. (2011, April). Why leaders don't learn from success.Harvard Business Review, pp. 2–8.
19.
GoddardR. D., & GoddardY. L. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools.Teaching and Teacher Education,17, 1–12.
20.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in educational research. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
HalversonR., GriggJ., PrichettR., & ThomasC. (2005). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Washington, DC.
22.
HippK. K., StollL., McMahonA., & HuffmanJ. B. (2003, April). An international perspective on the development of learning communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
23.
HordS. M. (2004). Learning together, leading together?Changing schools through professional learning communities.New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
HoyW., & TarterJ. (2011). Positive psychology and educational administration: An optimistic research agenda.Educational Administration Quarterly,47(3), 427–445.
25.
HubermanM. A., & MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
KingB. (2002). Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry.Teaching and Teacher Education,18, 243–257.
27.
KruseS. D. (2003). Remembering as organizational memory.Journal of Educational Administration,41(4), 332–347.
28.
LeithwoodK., & SteinbackR. (1994). Expert problem solving.Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
LevittB., & MarchJ. (1996). Organizational learning. In CohenM. D., & SproullL. S. (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 516–540). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
LouisK. S. (2006). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning, and trust.Journal of School Leadership,16(5), 477–489.
31.
MarshallC., & RossmanG. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
MichalskyT., & SchechterC. (2013). Preservice teachers’ self-regulated learning: Integrating learning from problems and learning from successes.Teaching and Teacher Education,30(1), 60–73.
34.
MillsM., SaxlE., & LiebermanA. (1988). What skills do educational change agents need? An empirical view.Curriculum Inquiry,18(2), 157–193.
35.
MitchellC., & SackneyL. (2006). Building schools, building people: The school principal's role in leading a learning community.Journal of School Leadership,16(5), 627–639.
36.
MulfordB., & SilinsH. (2011). Revised models and conceptualization of successful school principalship that improve student outcomes.International Journal of Educational Management,25(1), 61–82.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
PerezL. G., & UlineC. I. (2003). Administrative problem solving in the information age: Creating technological capacity.Journal of Educational Administration,41(2), 143–157.
40.
PetersonC. (2006). A primer in positive psychology.New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
RosenfeldJ. M., & SykesI. S. (1998). Toward “good enough” service to inaptly served families and children: Barriers and opportunities.European Journal of Social Work,1(3), 285–300.
42.
RossmanG. B., & RallisS. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
RumbergerR. W. (2004). What can be done to prevent and assist school dropouts? In Allen-MearesP., & FraserM. W. (Eds.), Intervention with children and adolescents: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 311–334). Boston: Pearson Education.
44.
SchechterC. (2005). Organizational learning mechanisms: Exploring a conceptual framework for organizational learning in schools.Journal of School Leadership,15(5), 571–600.
45.
SchechterC. (2010). Learning from success as a leverage for professional learning community: Exploring a school improvement process.Teachers College Record,112(1), 180–224.
46.
SchechterC. (2011). Toward communal negotiation of meaning in schools: Principals’ perceptions of collective learning from success.Teachers College Record,113(11), 2415–2459.
47.
SchechterC. (2013). Collective learning in schools: Exploring the perceptions of leadership trainees.International Journal of Educational Management,27(3), 273–291.
48.
SchechterC., & MichalskyT. (2014). Juggling our mindsets: Success-based learning as a complementary instructional framework in teacher education.Teachers College Record,116(2).
49.
SchechterC., SykesI., & RosenfeldJ. (2008). Learning from success as leverage for school learning: Lessons from a national program in Israel.International Journal of Leadership in Education,11(3), 301–318.
50.
SchwandtT. A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
ScribnerJ. P., HagerD. R., & WarneT. R. (2002). The paradox of professional community: Tales from two high schools.Educational Administration Quarterly,38(1), 45–76.
52.
SeligmanM. E. P., & CsikszentmihalyiM. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction.American Psychologist,25, 3–14.
53.
SergiovanniT. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
54.
SitkinS. (1996). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. In CohenM. D., & SproullL. S. (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 541–578). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
StollL., McMahonA., & ThomasS. (2006). Identifying and leading effective professional learning communities.Journal of School Leadership,16(5), 611–623.
56.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
SupovitzJ. A. (2002). Developing communities of instructional practice.Teacher College Record,104(8), 1591–1626.
58.
TaylorF. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management.New York: Harper & Brothers.
59.
ViranyB., TushmanM., & RomanelliE. (1996). Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organizational learning approach. In CohenM. D., & SproullL. S. (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 302–329). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
WeickK. E. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled schools.Phi Delta Kappan,63, 673–676.
61.
WeickK. E. (2000). Making sense of the organization.Boston: Blackwell.
