This article critically examines the sense-making processes of key stakeholders of Singapore's education: a historically dominant city-state, highly-qualified teachers, and high-performing students. The article interrogates the Teaching Schools Learning Nation policy initiative deployed toward achieving a knowledge-based economy. The article uses micropolitics in exploring issues that stakeholders face in the midst of globalization. Findings from research at the Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice at the National Institute of Education support key arguments. In exploring sense-making processes, the article uncovers paradoxical interpretational responses of stakeholders implementing the Teaching Schools Learning Nation policy, providing a critique of the city-state's knowledge-based economy ambitions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KearneyA. T., PolicyForeign, & Chicago Council for Global Affairs. (2008). The 2008 Global Cities Index. Retrieved from http://ForeignPolicy.com
AppaduraiA. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy.Public Culture,2, 1–24.
4.
AshtonD., GreenF., JamesD., & SungJ. (1999). Education and training for development in East Asia: The political economy of skill formation in East Asian newly industrialised economies.New York: Routledge.
5.
AshtonD., & SungJ. (2000). Maximizing human potential and the process of economic growth in Singapore. In HerschbachD., & CampbellC. (Eds.), Workforce preparation: An international perspective (pp. 196–212). Ann Arbor, MI: Prakken.
6.
AugusteB., KihnP., & MillerM. (2010). Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining top-third graduates to careers in teaching. In An international and market research-based perspective.Sydney, Australia: McKinsey.
7.
BacharachS., & MundellB. (1993). Organizational politics in schools: Micro, macro and logics of action.Educational Administration Quarterly,29(4), 423–452.
8.
BallS. (1994). Micropolitics of Schools. In HusenT., & PostlethwaiteT. N. (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 3821–3826). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
9.
BaumS. (2003). Social and economic restructuring and the new economy in Singapore. In ScraseT., HoldenT. J. M., & BaumS. (Eds.), Globalization, culture and inequality in Asia (pp. 215–284). Melbourne, Australia: Trans Pacific Press.
10.
BeatonA. E., MartinM. O., MullisI., GonzalesE. J., SmithT. A., & KellyD. L. (1996). Science achievement in the middle school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study.Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre.
11.
BlaseJ., & BlaseJ. (2002). The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research.Educational Administration Quarterly,38(1), 6–44.
12.
BoydW. (1991). Foreword. In BlaseJ. (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation (pp. vii–ix). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
BurbulesN., & TorresC. (2000). Globalization and education: An introduction. In BurbulesN., & TorresC. (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 1–26). New York: Routledge.
14.
ChanH. C. (1997). Politics in an administrative state: Where has the politics gone? In OngJ. H., TongC. K., & TanE. S. (Eds.), Understanding Singapore society (pp. 294–306). Singapore: Times Academic Press.
15.
ChangH. Y. J. (2003). Culture, state and economic development in Singapore.Journal of Contemporary Asia,33(1), 85–105.
16.
ChiaS. Y. (2001). Singapore: Towards a knowledge-based economy. In MasuyamaS., ChiaS. Y., & VandenbrinkD. (Eds.), Industrial restructuring in East Asia: Towards the 21st century (pp. 169–208). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
17.
ChngN. R. (2002). Fragrance and fragments of civil society: Reclaiming history. In SingamC., & TanC. K. (Eds.), Building social space in Singapore: The Working Committee's initiative in civil society activism (pp. 19–39). Singapore: Select.
18.
ChongS., & LowE.L. (2009). Why I want to teach and how I feel about teaching: Formation of teacher identity from pre-service to the beginning teacher phase.Educational Research for Policy and Practice,8(1), 59–72.
19.
DaleR., & RobertsonS. (2002). The varying effects of regional organizations as subjects of globalization of education.Comparative Education Review,46(1), 10–36.
20.
DedeC. (2000). Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum.Journal of Curriculum Studies,32(2), 281–303.
21.
DuttaS., & MiaI. (Eds.). (2010). The global information technology report 2009–2010: ICT for sustainability.Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum and INSEAD.
22.
FongS. Y., LimR, LengN. S., & LengO. A. (2007). PSLE seminar.Singapore: Singapore Examinations and Assessments Board.
23.
GohC. T. (1997, June). Shaping our future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Speech by PM Goh Chok Tong.
24.
GohS. P., & LohN. S. (2008, 10 September). Equal chances for all.Straits Times.
25.
GopinathanS. (1999). Preparing for the next rung: Economic restructuring and educational reform in Singapore.Journal of Education and Work,12(3), 295–308.
26.
GopinathanS. (2001). Challenges facing the Singapore education system today. In TanJ., GopinathanS., & HoW. K. (Eds.), Macro-policy: Globalisation, the state and education policy in Singapore (pp. 3–17). Singapore: Prentice Hall.
27.
GopinathanS. (2007). Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: A thesis revisited.Globalisation, Societies and Education,5(1), 53–70.
28.
GregoryK., & ClarkeM. (2003). High-stakes assessment in England and Singapore.Theory Into Practice,42(1), 66–74.
29.
HaasE. (1991). Collective learning: Some theoretical speculations. In BreslauerG., & TetlockP. (Eds.), Learning in U.S. and Soviet foreign policy (pp. 62–99). San Francisco: Westview.
30.
HalesM., KingS., & PenaA. M. (2010). The urban elite: The A. T. Kearney Global Cities Index 2010.Chicago: A. T. Kearney.
31.
HanC. (2000). National education and “active citizenship”: Implications for citizenship and citizenship education in Singapore.Asia Pacific Journal of Education,20(1), 63–72.
32.
HayC. (2002). Globalisation as a problem of political analysis: Restoring agents to a “process without a subject” and politics to a logic of economic compulsion.Cambridge Review of International Affairs,15(3), 379–392.
33.
HoK. L. (2000). Citizen participation and policy making in Singapore: Conditions and predicaments.Asian Survey,40(3), 436–455.
34.
HoK. W. (2007). Wage inequality, intergenerational mobility and education in Singapore.Ethos (3), 43–47.
35.
HoganD. (2006, May). Education and the pursuit of happiness in Singapore: Keynote address to the ERAS conference. Paper presented at the Educational Research Association of Singapore, Singapore.
36.
HoganD., & GopinathanS. (2008). Knowledge management, sustainable innovation, and pre-service teacher education in Singapore.Teaching and Teacher Education,14(4), 369–384.
37.
HoganD., Kramer-DahlA., KangT., KohK., ShunL., & LiauA. (2007). CRPP core research program. In McInerneyD., & LiemA. (Eds.), Progress report, year three.Singapore: National Institute of Education, Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice.
38.
HoganD., LukeA., Kramer-DahlA., KangT., KohK., ShunL., & LiauA. (2006). CRPP core research program. In Abdul RahimR., & KwekD. (Eds.), Progress report, year two.Singapore: National Institute of Education, Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice.
39.
JankowskiM. (2002). Minority youth and civic engagement: The impact of group relations.Applied Developmental Science,6(4), 237–245.
40.
KohA. (2010). Tactical globalization: Learning from the Singapore experiment.Bern, Switzerland: Lang.
41.
KohT. S., & LeeS. C. (2008). Information communication technology in education: Singapore's ICT masterplans 1997–2008.Singapore: World Scientific.
42.
LaskyS. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identify, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform.Teaching and Teacher Education,21(8), 899–916.
43.
LeeH. L. (2004). National Day rally speech of PM Lee Hsien Loong 22 August 2004 at the NUS University Cultural Centre.Singapore: Ministry of Information, Communication and the Arts.
44.
LeeK. Y. (1984). Appendix: Interview with PM Lee. In VasilR. (Ed.), Governing Singapore.Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
45.
LeeK. Y. (1999). Speech by Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew during the parliamentary debates on Singapore 21 on May 6, 1999. Singapore.
46.
LeeY. S. (2006). Speech of Mr. Lee Yi Shan, minister of state for trade and industry at the opening ceremony of the Asia Study Visit for African Policy Makers.Singapore: Ministry of Trade and Industry.
47.
MarshJ. (2012). The micropolitics of implementing a school-based bonus policy: The case of New York City's compensation committees.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,34(2), 164–184.
48.
MartinM., MullisI., GonzalesE., & ChrostowskiS. (2003). Executive summary.Boston: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre.
49.
Ministry of Education. (2006). MOE unveils $250M plan to boost the teaching profession.Singapore: Author.
Ministry of Trade and Industry. (1998). Committee on Singapore's competitiveness.Singapore: Author.
55.
MontsionJ. M. (2009). Relocating politics at the gateway: Everyday life in Singapore's global schoolhouse.Pacific Affairs,82(2), 637–656.
56.
MullisI., & MartinM. (2007). Overview of PIRLS 2006 results.Boston: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre.
57.
MullisI., MartinM., BeatonA., GonzalezE., KellyD., & SmithT. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS).Boston: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre.
58.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st century skills, education and competitiveness: A resource and policy guide.Tucson, AZ: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
59.
PeeblesG., & WilsonP. (2002). Economic growth and development in Singapore.Northampton, MA: Elgar.
60.
PetersM. (2001). National education policy constructions of the “knowledge economy”: Towards a critique.Journal of Educational Enquiry,2(1), 1–22.
61.
PhangS. Y. (2000). How Singapore regulates urban transportation and land use. In ShahidY., WuW., & EvenettS. (Eds.), Local dynamics in an era of globalization: 21st century catalysts for development (pp. 159–163). New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
ReyesV. (2010). The Philippine Department of Education: Challenges of policy implementation amidst corruption.Asia Pacific Journal of Education,30(4), 381–400.
63.
RileyK., & TorranceH. (2003). Big change question: As national policy makers seek to find solutions to national education issues, do international comparisons such as TIMSS and PISA create a wider understanding, or do they serve to promote orthodoxies of international agencies?Journal of Educational Change,4(4), 419–425.
64.
RodanG. (2004). Transparency and authoritarian rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia.London: RoutledgeCurzon.
65.
SabatierP. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein.Policy Sciences,21, 129–168.
ShanmugaratnamT. (2007b). Speech by Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam, minister for finance and minister for education at the 10th Appointment Ceremony for Principals at the Shangri-la Hotel, 28 December 2007.
SharpeL., & GopinathanS. (2002). After effectiveness: New directions in the Singapore school system?Journal of Education Policy,17(2), 151–166.
70.
SimJ. (2008). What does citizenship mean? Social studies teachers’ understandings of citizenship in Singapore schools.Educational Review,60(2), 253–266.
71.
SingamC., & TanC. K. (2002). Available spaces, today and tomorrow. In Building social space in Singapore: The Working Committee's initiative in civil society activism (pp. 155–174). Singapore: Select.
72.
Singapore Elections Department. (2011). Total votes cast for general election 2011.Singapore: Author.
73.
Singapore Statistics. (2010). Key household income trends, 2010.Policy Sciences, pp. 1–14.
TanJ., & GopinathanS. (2000). Education reform in Singapore: Towards greater creativity and innovation?NIRA Review,7(3), 5–10.
77.
TanS. C., ChaiC. S., LeeC. B., TeoK. G. T., ChenW., Koh Hwee LingJ., … CheahH. M. (2010). Evaluation of implementation of the IT Masterplan 3 and its impact on singapore schools: Instrumentation and baseline study (Research Brief No. 11-001). Singapore: National Institute of Education.
78.
TanY. K., ChowH. K., & GohC. (2008). Examinations in Singapore: Change and continuity 1891–2007.Singapore: World Scientific.
79.
WeeC. J. W. L. (2002). National identity, the arts and the global city. In da CunhaD. (Ed.), Singapore in the new millennium: Challenges facing the city state (pp. 221–242). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
80.
World Economic Forum. (2009). The global competitiveness report 2009–2010.Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
81.
ZoloD. (2004). The “Singapore model”: Democracy, communication, and globalization. In NashK., & ScottA. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to political sociology (pp. 407–417). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
