This study uses a mixed methods approach to examine a new type of curriculum configuration that supports students’ transitions to college: career technical programs of study (POS). Interview and survey data were collected from a college and its feeder high schools in each of three well-established (“mature”) sites in geographically varied communities in the United States to investigate how POS are structured, what the key the “ingredients” are, and what students experience as they move through the POS. Interview findings suggest that the key elements of POS include dedicated staff to create secondary–postsecondary connections, active multistakeholder advisory committees, and flexibility and compromise in developing dual-credit options for students. Survey data show that high school students feel positively about their experiences in POS; however, career guidance is lacking. Student records indicate that even when POS were in place to support their transition, less than one-fifth of students remained in the same POS in college that they began in high school. Results are discussed in relation to the 2006 Perkins IV legislation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achieve. (2010). Closing the expectations gap.Washington, DC: Author.
2.
ACT. (2011). Affirming the goal: Is college and career readiness an internationally competitive standard?Iowa City, IA: Author.
3.
Alfeld, C. (2010, January). Programs of study: Observations on process and structure.Techniques,85(1), 52–55.
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.American Psychologist,55(5), 469–480.
5.
ArnettJ. J. (2002). Adolescents in Western countries in the 21st century: Vast opportunities—For all? In BrownB. B., LarsonR. W., & SaraswathiT. S. (Eds.), The world's youth: Adolescents in eight regions of the globe (pp. 307–343). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BaileyT. R., & Mechur KarpM. (2003). Promoting college access and success: A review of credit-based transition programs.New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center, and Institute on Education and the Economy.
7.
CastellanoM., StringfieldS., & StoneJ. R.III (2003). Secondary career and technical education and comprehensive school reform: Implications for research and practice.Review of Educational Research,73, 231–272.
8.
ElmoreR. F. (1979). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions.Political Science Quarterly,94, 601–616.
9.
FurstenbergF. F., & NeumarkD. (2005). School-to-career and postsecondary education: Evidence from the Philadelphia educational longitudinal study.Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10.
JohnsonA. B., CharnerI., & WhiteR. (2003). Curriculum integration in context: An exploration of how structures and circumstances affect design and implementation.St. Paul, MN: National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.
11.
KarpM. M., CalcagnoJ. C., HughesK. L., JeongD. W., & BaileyT. R. (2007). The postsecondary achievement of participants in dual enrollment: An analysis of student outcomes in two states.St. Paul, MN: National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.
12.
KempleJ. J. (2004). Career academies: Impacts on labor market outcomes and educational attainment.New York: MDRC.
13.
LekesN., BraggD. D., LoebJ. W., OleksiwC. A., MarszalekJ., Brooks-LaRaviereM. (2007). Career and technical education pathway programs, academic performance, and the transition to college and career.St. Paul, MN: National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.
14.
LewisM. V., & KosineN. R. (with OvermanL.)., (2008). What will be the impact of programs of study? A preliminary assessment based on similar previous initiatives, state plans for implementation, and career development theory.Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.
15.
MetLife. (2011). Preparing students for college and careers: Part I. Clearing the path.New York: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.
16.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation's report card: America's high school graduates (NCES Document No. 2011-462). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17.
Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE). (2010). Programs of study local implementation readiness and capacity self-assessment: A tool for local college and career readiness. Retrieved from http://cte.ed.gov/docs/POSLocalImplementationTool-9-14-10.pdf
18.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). Learning for jobs: Synthesis report of the OECD reviews of vocational education and training.Paris: Author.
19.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2010). Up to the challenge: The role of career and technical education and 21st century skills in college and career readiness.Washington, DC: Author.
RecessoA. M. (1999). First year implementation of the School to Work Opportunities Act Policy: An effort at backward mapping.Education Policy Analysis Archives,7. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n11.html
StipanovicN., LewisM. V., & StringfieldS. (2012). Situating programs of study within current and historical career and technical educational reform efforts.International Journal of Educational Reform,21, 80–97.
24.
SymondsW. C., SchwartzR. B., & FergusonR. (2011). Pathways to prosperity: Meeting the challenge of preparing young Americans for the 21st century.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, Pathways to Prosperity Project.
