This article provides a broad overview of the history of career-focused education in the United States and the reauthorization of the federal Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006. The Perkins act required that the recipients of its funding offer at least one program of study, and this reauthorization included four core components that play a central role in the implementation of the overall Programs of Study initiative. As such, we provide a background of the development of the Programs of Study initiative in Perkins through earlier initiatives: Tech Prep, career pathways, youth apprenticeship, and dual/concurrent-credit programs. We also offer a brief overview of the challenges faced by each initiative, along with an overview of the three National Research Center for Career and Technical Education longitudinal studies represented in this special issue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikinW. M. (1942). The story of the Eight Year Study.New York: Harper.
2.
American Youth Policy Forum. (1998). The forgotten half revisited.Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Association for Career and Technical Education. (2006). Reinventing the American high school for the 21st century: A position paper.Alexandria, VA: Author.
4.
Association for Career and Technical Education. (2007). Expanding opportunities: Post-secondary career and technical education and preparing tomorrow's workforce. A position paper.Alexandria, VA: Author.
5.
Association for Career and Technical Education. (2011). What is career and technical education? CTE fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.acteonline.org/cte_info.aspx
6.
BaileyT. (1993). Can youth apprenticeship thrive in the United States?Educational Researcher,22(3), 4–10.
7.
BermanP., & McLaughlinM. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. 3. Implementing and sustaining innovations.Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
8.
BraggD. D., LoebJ. W., GongY., DengC.-P., YooJ., & HillJ. L. (2002). Transition from high school to college and work for Tech Prep participants in eight selected consortia.St. Paul: University of Minnesota, National Research Center for Career and Technical Education. Retrieved from http://www.nccte.org/publications/infosynthesis/r%26dreport/Transition-Bragg%20ALL.pdf
9.
CarlD.Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 105-332, 250 Stat. 35 (2006).
10.
CastellanoM., StoneJ. R.III, StringfieldS., Farley-RippleE. N., OvermanL. T., & HussainR. (2007). Career-based comprehensive school reform serving disadvantaged youth in minority communities.St. Paul: University of Minnesota, National Research Center for Career and Technical Education. Retrieved from http://www.nccte.org/publications/Career-Based_CSR.pdf
11.
DatnowA. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts.Educational Administration Quarterly,41(1), 121–153.
12.
DatnowA., BormanG., StringfieldS., RachubaL., & CastellanoM. (2003). Comprehensive school reform in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts: Implementation and outcomes from a four-year study.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,25(2), 143–170.
13.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education.New York: Macmillan.
14.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education.New York: Macmillan.
15.
DynarskiM., GleasonP., RangarajanA., & WoodR. (1998). Impacts of dropout prevention programs: Final report.Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
16.
HamiltonS. F. (1990). Apprenticeship for adulthood: Preparing youth for the future.New York: Free Press.
17.
HamiltonS. F., & HamiltonM. A. (1999). Creating new pathways to adulthood by adapting German apprenticeship in the United States. In HeinzW. R. (Ed.), From education to work: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 194–213). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HargreavesA., & FinkD. (2006). The ripple effect.Educational Leadership,63(8), 16–20.
19.
HerrE. L. (1976). The emerging history of career education.Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Career Education.
KarpM. M., CalcagnoJ. C., HughesK. L., JeongD. W., & BaileyT. R. (2007). The postsecondary achievement of participants in dual enrollment: An analysis of student outcomes in two states.St. Paul: University of Minnesota, National Research Center for Career and Technical Education. Retrieved from http://www.nccte.org/publications/Dual_Enrollment.pdf
24.
LekesN., BraggD. D., LoebJ. W., OleksiwC. A., MarszalekJ., LaRaviereM. B. (2007). Career and technical education pathway programs, academic performance, and the transition to college and career.St. Paul: University of Minnesota, National Research Center for Career and Technical Education. Retrieved from http://www.nccte.org/publications/infosynthesis/r&dreport/CTE_Pathway_Programs.pdf
25.
LewisV. D. (2008). Effectiveness of previous initiatives similar to programs of study: Tech Prep, career pathways, and youth apprenticeships.Career and Technical Education Research,33(3), 165–188.
26.
McLaughlinJ. M., & MooreC. E. (1990). The reform movement and Ed.D. expansion. Paper presented at the Fall Meeting of the Midwest Council for Educational Administration (St. Cloud, MN, October 26, 1990).
Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE). (2010). Career and technical programs of study: A design framework.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Division of Academic and Technical Education. Retrieved from http://cte.ed.gov/file/POS_Framework_Unpacking_1-20-10.pdf
29.
ParnellD. (1985). The neglected majority.Washington, DC: Community College Press.
30.
PayneC. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
31.
PierattJ. R. (2010). Advancing the ideas of John Dewey: A look at the high tech schools.Education & Culture,26(2), 52–64.
SERVE Center. (2010). A better 9th grade: Early results from an experimental study of the early college high school model.Greensboro, NC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.serve.org/FileLibraryDetails.aspx?id=179
35.
StringfieldS., MillsapM., & HermanR. (1998). Using “promising programs” to improve educational processes and student outcomes. In HargreavesA., LiebermanA., FullanM., & HopkinsD. (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 1314–1338). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
36.
SupovitzJ. A., & WeinbaumE. H. (Eds.). (2008). The implementation gap.New York: Teachers College.
37.
SymondsW. C., SchwartzR. B., & FergusonR. (2011). Pathways to prosperity: Meeting the challenge of preparing young Americans for the 21st century.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
38.
WaitsT., SetzerJ. C., & LewisL. (2005). Dual credit and exam-based courses in U.S. public high schools: 2002–03 (NCES Document No. 2005–009).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005009.pdf
39.
Grant FoundationW. T. (1988). The forgotten half.New York: Author.
