The aim of the current study is to determine the perception of teacher candidates concerning ideal teachers and to determine the perception of qualitative teachers that teacher candidates have and put a light on the selection of teacher candidates and the development of teacher-training programs. In the study, quantitative and qualitative techniques were used depending on a descriptive model. The data were examined through text and concept analysis. A sample comprising 593 teacher candidates was determined. The categories were formed under three categories: basic roles, perceptive subroles, and perceptive qualifications. The perception of the sample concerning basic roles was identified in eight categories. The sample expressed the perceptive subroles regarding 25 subroles with 318 perceptive qualities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akarİ. (1996). Türkiye'de Öğretmen İstihdam Politikasi ve Uygulamasi [Teacher employment policy and practice in Turkey]. Ankara, Turkey: Armagbreve;an Yayinevi.
2.
AlkanC. (2000). Meslek Olarak Ögbreve;retmenlik [Teaching as a profession]. In SönmezV. (Ed.), Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş [Introduction to the teaching profession]. Ankara, Turkey: Ani yayincilik
3.
ArendsR. (2004). Learning to teach (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
4.
ÇetinŞ. (2001). Ideal Ögbreve;retmen Üzerine Bir Araştirma [A research on ideal teacher].Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 149, 19–22.
5.
CruickshankD. R., JenkinsD. B., & MetcalfK. K. (2003). The act of teaching.New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
DayC., ElliotB., & KingtonA. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment.Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 563–577.
7.
De LandsheereV. (1992). L'éducation et La formation.Paris: PUF.
8.
DemirelÖ. (2009). Öğretme Sanati [The art of learning]. Ankara, Turkey: PEGEMA Yayincilik
9.
DilaverH.H.(1994). Türkiye'de Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve istihdam Şartlari [The teacher training and employment conditions in Turkey]. Milli Eğitim Basimevi: Istanbul.
10.
DuhazéS. B. (2007). La professionnalisation de professeurs des écoles débutants: Etude du processus de transition formation-titularisation. Symposium formation et travail: Dynamiques de professionnalisation d'enseignants des premier et second degrés.Actualité de la Recherche en Education et en Formation, AREF, Congrés du 40e Anniversaire des Sciences de l'Education (1), Strasbourg. Retrieved from http://www.congresintaref.org/actes_pdf/AREF2007_Sophie_BRIQUET-DUHAZE_397.pdf
11.
DumanT. (1991). Türkiye'de Orta Öğretime Öğretmen Yetiştirme—Tarihi Gelişimi [Training teacher for secondary education in Turkey—evolution historic]. Istanbul, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Basimevi.
12.
ErgünM., & DumanT. (1998). Kritik Durumlarda Öğretmen Davranişlari [Teacher behaviours in critical cases]. Ankara, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Dergisi.
13.
ErtürkS. (1970). On Yil Öncesine Kiyasla Öğretmen Davranişlari [Teacher behaviors compared to those of 10 years ago].Hacettepe Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi. Cilt 2/Sayi2, 103–146.
14.
European Commission. (2005). Testing conference on the common European principles for teacher competences and qualifications1–7.
15.
FioreD. J., & WhitakerT. (2005). Six types of teachers.Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
16.
GelişliY. (2007). Effects of teachers’ attitudes and behaviour on students: Attitudes, behaviour, and academic success in Turkey.International Journal of Educational Reform, 16(1), 96–106.
17.
GendronB. (2008). Les compétences émotionnelles comme compétences professionnelles de l'Enseignant la figure de Leadership en pédagogie.Cinquième Colloque Questions de Pédagogies dans l'Enseignement Supérieur. Brest, France.
18.
GordonT. (1993). Etkili Öğretmenlik Egitimi [Teacher effectiveness training]. Istanbul, Turkey: Sistem Yayincilik
19.
Gouvernement du Québec. (2001). La formation à l'enseignement. Les orientations, Les compétences professionnelles.Quebec, Canada: Author.
20.
GözütokD. F. (1992). Öğretmenlerin ve Öğrencilerin Algilarina Göre Mesleki Davranişlarin Değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of professional behaviours according to teacher and student perception].Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 405–409.
21.
HardenR. M., & CrosbyJ. R. (2000). The good teacher is more than a lecturer: The twelve roles of the teacher.Medical Teacher, 22, 334–347.
22.
HesapçioğluM. (1994). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri [Teaching methods and strategies]. Beta, Istanbul.
23.
JahangiriL., & MuccioloT. W. (2008). Characteristics of effective classroom teachers as identified by students and professionals: A qualitative study.Journal of Dental Education, 72, 488–499.
24.
KaragözoğluG. (2008). Türk Eğitim Sisteminde Öğretmen Yetiştirme Çikmazimiz [Our dead end of teacher training at Turkish education system].Çağdaş Eğitim, 349, 3–7.
25.
KisakürekM. A. (2009). Öğretmen Eğitiminde Ulusal Yeterliler Çerçevesi ve Kalite Güvence Sistemi [National competence framework and quality warranty system at teacher training].Türkiye'de Öğretmen Yetistirme Çikmazi Sempozyumu, 19–26.Tekişik Eğitim Arastirma Geliştirme Vakfi: Ankara
26.
KüçükahmetL. (2002). İdeal Öğretmen Nasil Davranir? [How does an ideal teacher behave?]. Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayinlari.
27.
LynchJ. (1977). Lifelong education and the preparation of educational personnel.UNESCO Institute for Education.
28.
MalmB. (2008). Towards a new professionalism: Enhancing personal and professional development in teacher education.Journal of Education for Teaching, 35, 77–91.
29.
Milli Eğitim Bakanliği. (1983). Millî Eğitim Bakanliğinin Teşkilat Ve Görevleri Hakkinda Kanun [Law on the organization and tasks of the Ministry of Education]. Ankara, Turkey.
30.
Milli Eğitim Bakanliği. (2008). Öğretmen Yeterlikleri—Öğretmenlik Mesleği Genel ve Özel Alan Yeterlikleri [Teacher competence—The competence of general and special field of teaching profession]. Ankara, Turkey: Devlet Kitaplari Müdürlüğü.
31.
Milliyet. (2007). Öğrencilerin Gözünden Ideal Öğretmen [Ideal teacher in terms of students]. Istanbul.
32.
MorinE. (2000). Les Sept Savoirs Nécessaires à l'Education du Futur.Paris: Seuil.
33.
NamiK. (1934). Muallimin Meslek Ahlaki [The morality of teacher]. Istanbul, Turkey: Devlet Matbaasi.
34.
ÖbekR., & YeşilR. (2009). The evaluation of in-class instructional competences of branch teaching staff (the sample of Firat University).İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 111–128.
35.
ÖncülR. (2000). Eğitim ve Eğitim Bilimleri Sözlüğü [Dictionary of education and educational sciences]. İstanbul, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Basimevi.
36.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Le rôle Crucial des Enseignants: Attirer, Former Et Retenir des Enseignants De Qualité [Critical role of teachers: Drawing qualitative teachers into the profession, training and keeping them in the profession]. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document
37.
PaguayL., AltetM., CharlierE., & PerrenoudP. (2001). Former des enseignants professionnels.Brussels, Belgium: Editions De Boeck.
38.
PalazoğluA. B. (1991). Başöğretmen ATATÜRK 1919–1928 [ATATÜRK, the teacher in chief]. Cilt-1. Ankara, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Bakanliği.
SabanA. (2004). Giriş Düzeyindeki Sinif Öğretmeni Adaylarinin “Öğretmen” Kavramina İlişkin öne Sürdükleri Metaforlar [The metaphors put forward by pre-service classroom teachers at the grade of beginning].Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 131–155.
42.
SchwartzR. B. (2007). Attirer et Retenir les Enseignants.L'Observateur de l'OCDE, 261.
SönmezV. (2000). Eğitimin Tarihsel Temelleri [Historical basis of education]. In SönmezV. (Ed.), Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş [Introduction to the teaching profession]. Ankara, Turkey: Ani Yayincilik.
45.
SönmezV., YanginB., AkbayrakB., ÖztürkK., TürkyilmazF., CelepoğluA. (2008). Öğretmenlikte Karşilaşilan Güçlükler ve Çözüm Önerileri [The challenges encountered at teaching and propositions to solve them].Gelecekteki Olasi Eğitim Sistemleri [Educational system possible in future]. Ankara, Turkey: Ani Yayincilik.
46.
SünbülA. M. (2006). Bir Meslek Olarak Öğretmenlik [Teaching profession]. In DemirelÖ, & KayaZ. (Eds.), Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş [Introduction to the teaching profession]. Ankara, Turkey: PEGEM-A Yayincilik.
47.
TürkoğluA. (1988). &Ibreve;yi Öğretmen Kimdir [Who is a good teacher?].Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 129–138.
48.
TürkoğluA. (1990). Öğretmen Yetiştirmede Bazi Prensip ve Aşamalar [Some principles and stages at teacher training].Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(3), 193–199.
49.
YetkinerN. K. (2007). Çevirmen Kararlari ve Sorumluluğu Bağlaminda Bir Kampanya Metninin Çözümlenmesi [An analysis of a campaign text within the framework of interpreter decisions and responsibility].LITTERA Edebiyat Yazilari, 20, 145–156.
50.
YilmanM. (2003). Eğitimin Tarihsel Temelleri [Historical basis of education]. In DemirelÖ, & KayaZ. (Eds.), Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş [Introduction to the teaching profession]. Ankara, Turkey: PEGEM-A Yayincilik.
