This case study describes a 20-year journey of educational transformation from 1985 to 2005 in a bellwether, or highly developed, instance of one school, family, and community partnership—the Kileely Community Project— situated in a large social housing project in Limerick City in the Midwestern region of the Republic of Ireland. The study is a narrative account of how a declining elementary school struggled against the odds to become a vibrant community learning center. Guided by a mix of feminist emancipatory research and socioecological and social capital theories, the study yielded findings on the hidden potential of patience combined with hope as a catalyst for changing the ways that learners learn and teachers teach, for building commitment to sustainable learning, for working for change in community teams through collective intelligence, for building a capacity for change and risk, and for fostering trust and respect in relationships. Implications are discussed for the development, growth, and sustainability of family, school, and community partnerships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aull DaviesC. (1999). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching self and others.London: Routledge.
2.
BriggsX. (1997). Social capital and the cities: Advice to change agents.National Civic Review,86(2), 111–117.
3.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BrykS., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory, objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CharmazK. (2003). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In HolsteinJ. S., & GubriumJ. G. (Eds.), Inside interviewing, new lenses, new concerns (pp. 311–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
ClandininD. J., & ConnellyM. F. (2000). Narrative inquiry, experience and story in qualitative research.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
CohenC. J. (2001). Social capital, intervening institutions and political power. In SaegertS., ThompsonJ. P., & WarrenM. R. (Eds.), Social capital and poor communities (pp. 267–289). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
ConatyC. (2002). Including all, home school and community united in education.Dublin, Ireland: Veritas.
10.
CoveyS. R. (1992). Principle-centered leadership.London: Simon & Schuster.
11.
DeeganJ., DevineD., & LodgeA. (2004). Primary voices, equality, diversity and childhood in Irish primary schools.Dublin, Ireland: Institute of Public Administration.
EllisC., & BergerL. (2003). Their story, my story, our story: Including the researcher's experience in interview research. In HolsteinJ. A., & GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Inside interviewing new lenses, new concerns (pp. 849–875). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
EpsteinJ. E. (2001). School, family and community partnerships, preparing educators and improving schools.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
Field BelenkyM., McVicker ClinchyB., Rule GoldbergerN., & Mattuch TaruleJ. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind.New York: Basic Books.
16.
FineM., & WeisL. (1996). Writing the “wrongs” of fieldwork: Confronting our own research/writing dilemmas’ in urban ethnographies.Qualitative Inquiry,2(3), 251–274.
17.
Florio-RuaneS. (1997). To tell a new story: Reinventing narratives of culture, identity, and education.Anthropology and Education Quarterly,28(2), 152–162.
18.
FreireP. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed.London: Penguin.
19.
FreireP. (1992). Pedagogy of hope.London: Continuum.
20.
FreireP. (2005). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare to teach.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine.
22.
GodfreyJ. J. (1987). A philosophy of human hope.Dordrecht, Netherlands: Nijhoff.
23.
GreeneM. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
HalpernD. (2005). Social capital.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
25.
HalpinD. (2003). Hope and education: The role of the utopian imagination.London: RoutledgeFalmer.
26.
HigginsA. (2007). “My kids, your kids, our kids!” In DownesP., & GilliganA. L. (Eds.), Beyond educational disadvantage (pp. 114–123). Dublin, Ireland: Institute of Public Administration.
27.
HooksB. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope.New York: Routledge.
28.
JosselsonR. (2007). The ethical attitude in narrative research. In ClandininD. J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 537–566). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
KellyL., BurtonS., & ReganL. (1994). Researching women's lives or studying women's oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research. In MaynardM., & PurvisJ. (Eds.), Researching women's lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 27–48). London: Taylor & Francis.
LynchK. (1999). Equality in education.Dublin, Ireland: Gill & Macmillan.
32.
McCaffertyD. (2005). Limerick: Profile of a changing city.Limerick, Ireland: Limerick City Development Board.
33.
McCalebS. P. (1994). Building communities of learners: A collaboration among teachers, students, families and community.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
NolanB., & MaitreB. (2007). Economic growth and income inequality: Setting the context. In FaheyT., RussellH., & WhelanC. T. (Eds.), Best of times? The social impact of the Celtic Tiger (pp. 27–41). Dublin, Ireland: Institute of Public Administration.
35.
NolanB., WhelanC. T., & WilliamsJ. (1998). Where are poor households? The spatial distribution of poverty and deprivation in Ireland.Dublin, Ireland: Oak Tree Press.
36.
PalmerP. J. (1983). To know as we are known.New York: HarperCollins.
37.
PalmerP. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’ s life.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
PotapchukW., CrockerJ., & SchechterJ. (1997). Building community with social capital: Chits and chums or chats with change.National Civic Review,86(2), 129.
41.
PopkewitzT. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher.New York: Teachers College Press.
42.
PutmanR. D. (1995). Bowling alone, America's declining social capital.Journal of Democracy,6(1), 65–78.
43.
PutmanR. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America.Political Science and Politics,28(4), 664–683.
44.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research.New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
SeligmanA. B. (1997). The problem of trust.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Starhawk. (1987). Truth or dare: Encounters with power, authority and mystery.New York: HarperCollins.
48.
StuhlmillerC. M. (2001). Narrative methods in qualitative research: Potential for therapeutic transformation. In GilbertK. (Ed.), The emotional nature of qualitative research (pp. 63–80). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
