The current study aimed to explore the weaknesses of the junior high school system in Israel, a country whose first junior high schools (Grades 7–9) were established in the early 1970s and whose educational system differs from the systems of Europe and North America in terms of structure, ideology, and control. Based on semistructured interviews with role incumbents in the junior high school system, the study found major difficulties in areas such as student behavior, student achievements, personal attention, interschool transition, resources, clear policy, and so forth. Implications for the planning of grade configurations worldwide are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlspaughJ. W. (1998). Achievement loss associated with the transition to middle school and high school.Journal of Educational Research,92, 20–26.
2.
AmirY., RichY., & Ben-AriY. (1978). Problems in the social integration in junior high school [In Hebrew].Issues in Education,18, 32–45.
3.
AndermanE. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence.Journal of Educational Psychology,94(4), 795–809.
4.
AngusD. L., JefferyE. M., & MarisA. V. (1988). Historical development of age-stratification in schooling.Teacher College Record,90(2), 211–236.
5.
ArciaE. (2007). A comparison of elementary/K–8 and middle schools’ suspension rates.Urban Education,42(5), 456–469.
6.
BaerJ. (1999). Adolescent development and the junior high school environment.Social Work in Education,21(4), 238–248.
7.
BalfanzR., SpiridakisK., & Curran-NeildR. (2002). Will converting high-poverty middle schools to K–8 schools facilitate achievement gains?Philadelphia: School District of Philadelphia.
8.
BergquistC. C., BigbieC. L., GrovesL., & RichardsonG. H. (2004). Evaluation report for the study of alternatives to suspension.Tallahassee, FL: Evaluation Systems Design.
9.
CantinS., & BoivinM. (2004). Change and stability in children's social network and self-perceptions during transition from elementary to junior high school.International Journal of Behavioral Development,28(6), 561–570.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CubanL. (1992). What happens to reforms that last? The case of the junior high school.American Educational Research Journal,29(2), 227–251.
DouglassA. (1945). The persistent problems of the junior high school.California Journal of Secondary Education,20, 112–120.
14.
DuffyG. G. (1990). Reading in the middle school.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
15.
EcclesJ. S., LordS., & MidgleyC. M. (1991). What are we doing to adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents.American Journal of Education,99, 521–542.
16.
EcclesJ. S., MidgleyC. M., WigfieldA., BuchananC., ReumanD., & FlanaganC. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in school and families.American Psychologist,48(2), 90–101.
17.
ElovitzL. H. (2007). Is the middle school becoming extinct?Principal Leadership,7(7), 26–30.
18.
EnglertM. (1998). The impact of the school's organizational structure upon the teachers’ role perception and self-efficacy in elementary versus junior high school [In Hebrew]. Unpublished master's thesis, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
19.
GeorgeP. S., & AndersonW. G. (1989). Maintaining the middle school: A national survey.NASSP Bulletin,73, 67–74.
20.
GiffordV. D., & DeanM. M. (1990). Differences in extracurricular activity participation, achievement, and attitudes between ninth-grade students attending junior high school and those attending senior high school.Adolescence,25, 799–802.
21.
GlaserG., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.Chicago: Aldine.
22.
GrolnickW. S., KurowskiC. O., DunlapK. G., & HeveyC. (2000). Parental resources and the transition to junior high.Journal of Research on Adolescence,37(2), 143–156.
23.
HargreavesA. (1986). Two cultures of schooling: The case of middle schools.Lewes, UK: Falmer Press.
24.
HermanB. E. (2004). The revival of K–8 schools.Phi Delta Kappa,519, 7–37.
25.
HertzogC. J., & MorganP. L. (1998). Breaking the barriers between middle school and high school: Developing a transition team for student success.NASSP,82, 94–98.
26.
HoyW. K., & MiskelC. G. (2005). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
KashtiY., AlpertB., YusifunM., & ManorA. (1997). The heterogenic school: Unity within diversity [In Hebrew]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Ramot.
28.
KashtiY., ManorA., & ChenikM. (1989). Classroom management in junior high schools: Problems and meanings [In Hebrew]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University, School of Education, Sociology of Education and Community Unit.
29.
KfirD., RashN., AdlerH., & SafranK. (1993). Integration in education: Policy and implementation [In Hebrew]. Jerusalem: NCJW Research Institute for Innovation in Education.
30.
LarsonR. W., & MaryseH. R. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students.American Journal of Education,99(4), 419–443.
31.
LevinB. (2001). Reforming education: From origins to outcomes.London: Routledge.
32.
LevinH. (1988). Accelerated schools for at-risk students.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for Policy Research in Education
33.
LippsG. (2005). Making the transition: The impact of moving from elementary to secondary school on adolescents’ academic achievement and psychological adjustment.Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Family and Labour Studies Division Statistics.
34.
MacIverD., & EpsteinJ. L. (1993). Responsive practice in the middle grades: Teacher teams advisory groups, remedial instruction and school transition programs.American Journal of Education,99(4), 587–622.
35.
MarshH. W., & HattieJ. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on the structure of self-concept. In BrackenB. A. (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social and clinical considerations (pp. 38–90). New York: Wiley.
MidgleyC., & EdelinK. C. (1998). Middle school reform and early adolescent well being: The good news and the bad.Educational Psychologist,33(4), 195–206.
38.
MidthasselU. V. (2004). Teacher involvement in school development activity and its relationships to attitudes and subjective norms among teachers: A study of Norwegian elementary and junior high school teacher.Educational Administration Quarterly,40(3), 435–456.
39.
Ministry of Education. (1990). The junior high school: Principles, guidelines, and directions for activities [In Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Author.
40.
OplatkaI. (2002). The emergence of educational marketing: Lessons from the experiences of Israeli principals.Comparative Education Review,46(2), 211–233.
41.
OplatkaI. (2004). Women teachers’ emotional commitment and involvement: A universal professional feature and educational policy.Education and Society,22(2), 23–43.
42.
OplatkaI. (2007). The context and profile of teachers in developing countries in the last decade: A revealing discussion for further investigations.International Journal of Educational Management,21(6), 476–490.
43.
PatonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation method.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
PellegriniA. D. (2002). Bullying, victimization and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school.Educational Psychologist,37(3), 151–163.
45.
RashN. (2006). Reform and integration in the educational system. In InbarD. (Ed.), Towards an educational revolution (pp. 339–326). Jerusalem: Van Leer Institute.
46.
RathundeK., & CsikszentmihalyiM. (2005). Middle school students’ motivation and quality of experience: A comparison of Montessori and traditional school environments.American Journal of Education,111, 341–371.
47.
ReddyR., RhodesJ. E., & MulhallP. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A latent growth curve study.Development and Psychopathology,15(1), 119–138.
48.
SchillerK. S. (1999). Effects of feeder patterns on students’ transition to high school.Sociology of Education,72(2), 216–233.
49.
SchmidaM. (1987). Between equality and excellence [In Hebrew]. Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar-Ilan University.
50.
SeidmanE., LambertL. E., AllenL., & AberJ. L. (2003). Urban adolescents’ transition to junior high school and protective family transactions.Journal of Early Adolescence,23(2), 166–193.
51.
SimmonsR. G., & BlythD. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context.New York: Aldine.
52.
WeissC. C., & KipnesL. (2006). Reexamining middle school effects: A comparison of middle grades students in middle schools and K–8 schools.American Journal of Education,112(2), 239–272.
53.
WhitleyJ., LupartJ. L., & BeranT. (2007). Differences in achievement between adolescents who remain in a K–8 school and those who transition to a junior high school.Canadian Journal of Education,30(3), 649–669.
