This qualitative study examined the educational leadership program coordinator's role in selected research universities, through interviews of 10 coordinators. These individuals were responsible for quasi-administrative curriculum development and outreach duties. Coordinators were committed to leading their programs despite extensive time commitments and few incentives. Two issues created barriers to distributing leadership responsibilities: faculty autonomy and program faculty size. Lacking formal authority, coordinators sometimes found it difficult to enlist the assistance of faculty colleagues. Individuals in tenure-line positions viewed their responsibilities as challenging their continued scholarly productivity, whereas those non-tenure-track positions noted that their work performance was evaluated using different criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergB. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
CamburnE., RowanB., & TaylorJ. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347–373.
CarrollJ. B. (1991). Career paths of department chairs: A national perspective. Research in Higher Education, 32, 669–688.
5.
CarrollJ. B., & WolvertonM. (2004). Who becomes a chair? In GmelchW. H., & SchuhJ. H. (Eds.), The life cycle of a department chair (pp. 3–10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
CoplandM. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375–395.
7.
CrowG., HausmanC. S., & ScribnerJ. P. (2002). Reshaping the principalship. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge (pp. 189–210). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
EddyP. L., & VanDerLindenK. E. (2006). Emerging definitions of leadership in higher education. Community College Review, 34(1), 5–26.
9.
ElmoreR. F. (2000, Winter). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
10.
FirestoneW. (1996). Leadership roles or functions. In LeithwoodK., ChapmanJ., CorsonD., HalingerP., & HartA. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (Vol. 2, pp. 395–418). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
11.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine.
12.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
13.
GmelchW. H. (2004). The department chair's balancing acts. In GmelchW. H., & SchuhJ. H. (Eds.), The life cycle of a department chair (pp. 69–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
GmelchW. H., & BurnsJ. S. (1994). Sources of stress for academic department chairpersons. Journal of Educational Administration, 32, 79–94.
15.
GmelchW. H., & MiskinV. D. (1995). Chairing an academic department.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
GoldsteinJ. (2003). Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of peer assistance and review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 397–421.
17.
GrattonM. (1993). Leadership in the learning organization. New Directions for Community Colleges, 84, 93–103.
18.
GronnP. (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform.London: Chapman.
19.
GrubbW. N., & FlessaJ. J. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 518–550.
20.
GurrD., DrysdaleL., & MulfordB. (2006). Models of successful principal leadership. School Leadership and Management, 26, 371–395.
21.
HarrisA. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading?Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32(1), 11–24.
22.
HarrisA. (2006). Opening up the “black box” of leadership practice: Taking a distributed leadership perspective. International Studies in Educational Administration, 34(2), 37–45.
23.
HarrisA., BrownD., & AbbottI. (2006). Executive leadership: Another lever in the system?School Leadership and Management, 26, 397–409.
24.
HartleyD. (2007). The emergence of distributed leadership in education: Why now?British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 202–214.
25.
HatcherR. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26, 253–267.
26.
HechtI. W. D., HiggersonM. L., GmelchW. H., & TuckerA. (1999). The department chair as academic leader.Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
27.
KnightP. T., & TrowlerP. R. (2001). Departmental leadership in higher education.Buckingham, UK: Society for Research Into Higher Education.
28.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 201–227.
29.
LeithwoodK., MascallB., StraussT., SacksR., MemonB., & YashkinaA. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37–67.
30.
LucasA. F. (1994). Strengthening departmental leadership: A team-building guide for chairs in colleges and universities.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
LumbyJ. (2003). Distributed leadership in colleges: Leading or misleading?Educational Management and Administration, 31, 283–293.
32.
MacBeathJ. (2005). Leadership as distributed: A matter of practice. School Leadership and Management, 25, 349–366.
33.
MuijsD., HarrisA., LumbyJ., MorrisonM., & SoodK. (2006). Leadership and leadership development in highly effective further education providers. Is there a relationship?Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30(1), 87–106.
34.
OgawaR. T., & BossertS. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224–243.
35.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
PresthusA. M. (2006). A successful school and its principal—Enabling leadership within the organization. International Studies in Educational Administration, 34(2), 82–99.
37.
ScribnerJ. P., SawyerR. K., WatsonS. T., & MyersV. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 67–100.
38.
SmylieM. A., & HartA. W. (2000). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 421–441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
SpillaneJ. P., DiamondJ. B., WalkerL. J., HalversonR., & JitaL. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 918–940.
40.
SpillaneJ. P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
41.
SpillaneJ. P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34.
42.
ThomasJ. R., & SchuhJ. H. (2004). Socializing new chairs. In GmelchW. H., & SchuhJ. H. (Eds.), The life cycle of a department chair (pp. 11–25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
TreadwellD. F. (1997). The department chair: A symbolic perspective and some implications. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 3, 218–224.
44.
TuckerA. (1992). Chairing the academic department: Leadership among peers (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
45.
WolvertonM., GmelchW. H., WolvertonM. L., & SarrosJ. C. (1999a). A comparison of department chair tasks in Australia and the United States. Higher Education, 38, 333–350.
46.
WolvertonM., GmelchW. H., WolvertonM. L., & SarrosJ. C. (1999b). Stress in academic leadership: U.S. and Australian department chairs/heads. Review of Higher Education, 22(2), 165–185.
