AstutoT. A., & ClarkD. L. (1985). Strength of organizational coupling in the instructionally effective school. Urban Education, 19(4), 331–356.
2.
BarthR. (1990). Improving schools from within.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BhalK. T., & AnsariM. A. (1996). Measuring quality of interaction between leaders and members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(11), 945–972.
4.
BrownD. J. (1991). Decentralization.Newbury Park, CA: Crowin Press.
5.
BrownD. J. (1992). The recentralization of school districts. Educational Policy, 6(3), 289–297.
6.
BrownF., & HunterR. C. (1998). School based management: Involving minority parents in shared decision making. Urban Education, 33(1), 95–122.
7.
BrykA. S. (1998, April). Chicago school reform: Linkages between local control, educational supports and pupil achievement. Paper presented at the Consortium on Chicago School Research symposium at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
8.
BullockA., & ThomasH. (1997). Schools at the center: A study of decentralization.London: Routledge.
9.
CaldwellB. J. (2003). A theory of learning in self managing school. In VolanskyA., & FriedmanI. (Eds.), School-based management: An international perspective (pp. 93–116). Jerusalem: State of Israel, Ministry of Education.
10.
ChengY. C. (1996). School effectiveness and school based management: A mechanism for development.London: Falmer Press.
11.
ChengY. C., & ChanM. T. (2000). Implementation of school based management: A multiperspective analysis of the case of Hong King. International Review of Education, 46(3/4), 205–232.
12.
ChubbJ. E., & MoeT. M. (1988). Politics, markets and the organization of schools. American Political Science Review, 82, 1065–1087.
13.
ChuiH. S., SharpeF. G., & McCormickJ. (1996). Vision and leadership of principals in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(3), 30–48.
14.
CluneW. H., & WhiteP. A. (1988). School-based management: Institutional variation, implementation and issues for further research.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for Policy Research in Education.
15.
CooperH. M. (1979). Pygmalion grows up: A model for teacher expectation communication and performance influence. Review of Educational Research, 49(3), 389–410.
16.
DimmockC. (1993). School-based management and school effectiveness.London: Routledge.
17.
DurkheimE. (1964). The division of labor in society.New York: Macmillan.
18.
FullanM. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). London: Cassell.
19.
GazielH. H. (1998). School-based management as a factor in school effectiveness. International Review of Education, 44(4), 319–333.
20.
GazielH., BoglerR., & NirA. E. (2005). An evaluation of the introduction of school-based management in schools: An assessment of inhibitors and catalysts [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, Chief Scientists Office.
21.
GazielH. H., & RommT. (1988). From centralization to decentralization: The case of Israel as a unique pattern of control in education. European Journal of Education, 23(4), 345–352.
22.
GradyN. B. (1993). Examining teachers’ images through metaphor: Development and validation of questionnaire. Studies in Educational Administration, 58, 21–31.
23.
GreenbergerD. B., & StrasserS. (1986). Development and application of a model of personal control in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 164–177.
24.
GreenbergerD. B., & StrasserS. (1991). The role of situational and dispositional factors in the enhancement of personal control in organizations. In CummingsL. L., & StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 111–145). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25.
GreenbergerD. B., StrasserS., CummingsL. L., & DunhamR. B. (1989). The impact of personal control on performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 29–51.
26.
GreenbergerD. B., StrasserS., & LeeS. (1988). Personal control as a mediator between perceptions of supervisory behaviors and employee reactions. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 405–417.
27.
HaddermanM. (1999). School-based budgeting (ERIC Digest No. 131). Eugene: University of Oregon, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
28.
HansonE. M. (1984). Administrative reform in the Venezuelan Ministry of Education: A case analysis of the 1970s. International Review of Education, 30(2), 119–141.
29.
HanushekE. A. (1996). Outcomes, costs and incentives in schools. In HanushekE. A., & JorgensonD. W. (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives (pp. 29–52). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30.
HanushekE. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on pupil performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164.
31.
HarrisM. M., & WillowerD. J. (1998). Principals’ optimism and perceived school effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 353–361.
32.
HermanJ. J., & HermanJ. L. (1993). School-based management: Current thinking and practice.Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
33.
HessG. A. (1999). Understanding achievement (and other) changes under Chicago school reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 67–83.
34.
HogwoodB. W., & PetersG. B. (1985). The pathology of public policy.Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
35.
HoyW. K., & FergusonJ. (1985). A theoretical framework and exploration of organizational effectiveness of schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(2), 117–134.
36.
HoyW. K., TarterC. J., & WitkoskieL. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(1), 38–45.
37.
HuiC., & LeeC. (2000). Moderating effects of organization-based self-esteem on organizational uncertainty: Employee response relationships. Journal of Management, 26(2), 215–232.
38.
JenkinsG. D., NadlerD. A., LawlerE. E., & CammannC. (1975). Standardized observations: An approach to measuring the nature of jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 171–181.
39.
LawtonM. (1997, November 5). Chicago study credits school based reforms. Education Week, p. 3.
40.
LevačićR. (1995). Local management of schools: Analysis and practice.Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
41.
LyonsT. F. (1971). Role clarity, need for role clarity, satisfaction, tension and withdrawal. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6(1), 99–110.
42.
MalenB., OgawaR. T., & KranzJ. (1990). What do we know about school based management? A case study of the literature—A call for research. In CluneW. H., & WitteJ. F. (Eds.), Choice and control in American education: Vol. 2. The practice of choice, decentralization and school restructuring (pp. 289–342). London: Falmer Press.
43.
MayoE. (1949). The social problems of an industrial civilization.London: Routledge / Kegan Paul.
44.
Minister of Education. (1993). The introduction of school-based management to schools: Recommendations of steering committee.Jerusalem: Author.
45.
MiskelC. G., FevurlyR., & StewartJ. (1979). Organizational structures and processes, perceived school effectiveness, loyalty, and job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(3), 97–118.
46.
MojkowskiC. (1991). Developing leaders for restructuring schools: New habits of mind and heart.Washington, NJ: National LEADership Network Group of Restructuring Schools.
47.
MottP. E. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations.New York: Harper & Row.
48.
NirA. E. (1998). Differentiating among role perceptions of echelons comprising a centralized national educational hierarchy. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(1), 83–93.
49.
NirA. E. (2000a). The annual plans of school-based management schools operating in a centralized educational system: Planning for ambiguity. Educational Planning, 12(4), 19–38.
50.
NirA. E. (2000b). The simplification trap in educational planning. Planning and Changing, 31(1-2), 70–83.
51.
NirA. E. (2002). School-based management and its effect on teacher commitment. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5(4), 323–341.
52.
O'TooleL. J.Jr. (1989). The public administrator's role in setting the policy agenda. In PerryJ. L. (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 225–236). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
ReitzugU. C. (1989). Principal–teacher interactions in instructionally effective and ordinary elementary schools. Urban Education, 24(1), 38–58.
54.
RielC., & SippleW. J. (1996). Making the most of time and talent: Secondary school organizational climates, teaching task environments and teacher commitment. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 873–901.
55.
RobertsonP. J., & BriggsK. L. (1998). Improving schools through school based management: An examination of the process of change. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(1), 35–68.
56.
SackneyL. E., & DibskiD. J. (1994). School-based management: A critical perspective. Educational Management and Administration, 22(2), 104–112.
57.
SlaterR. O., & TeddlieC. (1992). Towards a theory of school effectiveness and leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(4), 242–257.
58.
SleegersP., & WesselinghA. (1995). Dutch dilemmas: Decentralization, school autonomy and professionalisation of teachers. Educational Review, 47(2), 199–207.
59.
SummersA. A., & JohnsonA. W. (1996). The effects of school based management plans. In HanushekE. A., & JorgensonD. W. (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives (pp. 75–96). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
60.
UlineC. L., MillerD. M., & Tschannen-MoranM. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(4), 462–483.
WeeJ. (1997). Improved pupil learning and leadership in self-managed schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.
63.
WhittyG., PowerS., & HalpinD. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market.Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
64.
WohlstetterP., & McCurdyK. (1991). The link between school decentralization and school politics. Urban Education, 25(4), 391–414.
65.
WohlstetterP., & MohrmanS. A. (1996). Assessment of school based management.Los Angeles: University of Southern California.