AchesonK. A., & GallM. D. (1997). Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers: Preservice and inservice applications (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
2.
AllingtonR. L. (1994). What's special about special programs for children who find learning to read difficult?Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 1–21.
3.
AllingtonR. L., & CunninghamP. M. (1996). Schools that work. Where all children can read and write.New York: Longman.
4.
AllingtonR. L., & WalmsleyS. A. (1995). No quick fix: Where do we go from here? In AllingtonR. L., & WalmsleyS. A. (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp. 253–264). New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
BaileyG., & DyckN. (1990). The administrator and cooperative learning: Roles and responsibilities in instructional leadership. Clearing House, 64(1), 39–45.
BlaséJ., & BlaséJ. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130–141.
8.
BlumbergA., & GreenfieldW. (1986). The effective principal: Perspectives on school leadership (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
BoyanN. (1988). Describing and explaining administrative behavior. In BoyanN. (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 77–98). New York: Longman.
10.
BoydB. (1996). The principal as teacher: A model for instructional leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 80(580), 65–73.
11.
BrunnerC. C. (2000). Principles of power: Women superintendents and the riddle of the heart.Albany: State University of New York.
12.
BurnettI. E., & PankakeA. M. (1990, November). The effective elementary school principal: Theoretical bases, research findings and practical implications. Paper presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
13.
CarboM., & ColeR. W. (1995). What every principal should know about teaching reading. Principal, 74(5), 28–29.
14.
CarterS. C. (2000). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high-performing, high-poverty schools.Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
15.
CoplandM. A. (2001). The myth of the superprincipal. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7), 528–533.
16.
CottonK. (1999). Research you can use to improve results.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17.
DareshJ. C., GantnerM. W., DunlapK., & HvizdakM. (2000). Words from “the trenches”: Principals’ perspectives on effective school leadership characteristics. Journal of School Leadership, 10, 69–83.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to learn: Creating a blueprint for creating schools that work.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
FerrandinoV. L. (2001). Challenges for 21st-century elementary school principals. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(6), 440–442.
20.
FinkE., & ResnickL. B. (2001). Developing principals as instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(8), 598–606.
21.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change.New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
GinsbergR. (1988). Principals as instructional leaders: An ailing panacea. Education and Urban Society, 20(3), 276–293.
23.
GroganM. (2000). Laying the groundwork for a reconception of the superintendency from feminist postmodern perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 117–142.
24.
HallingerP. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 35–48.
25.
HallingerP., BickmanL., & DavisK. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549.
26.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157–191.
27.
HallingerP., & MurphyJ. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86, 217–247.
28.
HeckR. H. (1992). Principals’ instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 21–34.
29.
HeckR., LarsonT., & MarcoulidesG. (1990). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94–125.
30.
HenkW. A., MooreJ. C., MarinakB. A., & TomasettiB. W. (2000). A reading lesson observation framework for elementary teachers, principals, and literacy supervisors. The Reading Teacher, 53(5), 358–369.
31.
HenkinA. B., WanatC. L., & DavisJ. H. (1996). Social skills of principals: A profile in context. Journal of School Leadership, 6, 399–423.
32.
LarsenM. L., & MalenB. (1997, March). The elementary school principal's influence on teachers’ curricular and instructional decisions. Paper presented for the American Educational Research Association Convention in Chicago.
33.
LeithwoodK., BegleyP., & CousinsB. (1990). The nature, causes and consequences of principals’ practices: An agenda for future research. Journal of Educational Administration, 28, 5–31.
34.
LickteigM. J., ParnellM. K., & EllisS. D. (1995). Ways elementary administrators support literacy education. Reading Horizons, 35(4), 299–309.
35.
MaxwellJ. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
McAdamsR. P. (1998). The principalship: An international perspective. Principal, 77(3), 10–16.
37.
MillerJ. W., EllsworthR., & HowellJ. (1986). Public elementary schools which deviate from the traditional SES-achievement relationship. Educational Research Quarterly, 10, 31–50.
38.
National Association of Elementary School Principals. (1998). Best ideas for reading from America's Blue Ribbon Schools. What award-winning elementary and middle school principals do.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
39.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research method (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
PressleyM. (1998). Reading instruction that works. The case for balance teaching.New York: Guilford Press.
41.
RossmanG., & RallisS. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
SanacoreJ. (1994). Lifetime literacy through independent reading: The principal is a key player. Journal of Reading, 37(7), 602–606.
43.
SanacoreJ. (1997). Guidelines for successful reading leaders. Journal of Reading, 41, 64–68.
44.
SengeP. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York: Doubleday.
45.
SlavinR. E., MaddenN., KarweitN., LivermonB., & DolanL. (1990). Success for all: First-year outcomes of a comprehensive plan for reforming urban education. Amercian Educational Research Journal, 27, 255–278.
46.
SnowC. E., BurnsM. S., & GriffinP. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
TaylorB., ShortR., ShearerB., & FryeB. (1995). First grade teachers provide early reading intervention in the classroom. In AllingtonR., & WalmsleyS. (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp. 159–176). New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
WanzareZ., & Da CostaJ. (2001). Rethinking instructional leadership roles of the school principal: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Educational Thought, 35(3), 269–295.
51.
WhaleD. E. (2000). The principal and business manager. Principal, 79(3), 36–38. Whitaker, K. S. (1998). The changing role of the principal: View from the inside. Planning and Changing, 29, 130–150.
52.
WildyH., & DimmockC. (1993). Instructional leadership in primary and secondary schools in Western Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 31(2), 43–62.