AbramiP. C., CholmskyP., & GordonR. (2001). Statistical analysis for the social sciences: An interactive approach.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
AllenA., & PlankD. (2005). School board election structure and democratic representation. Educational Policy, 19, 510–527.
3.
AlreckP. L., & SettleR. B. (1995). The survey research handbook (2nd ed.). New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
4.
American Association of School Administrators. (1980). Roles and relationships: School boards and superintendents.Arlington, VA: Author.
5.
American Association of School Administrators. (1984). Holding effective board meetings.Arlington, VA: Author.
6.
BarkerL. L., CegalaD. J., KiblerR. J., & WahlersK. J. (1979). Groups in process: An introduction to small group communication.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BentonD. (1998). Applied human relations: An organizational and skill development approach (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
CistoneP. J. (Eds.). (1975). Understanding school boards: Problems and prospects.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
EadieD. (2003). High-impact governing: Overseeing superintendent performance is one key to an effective leadership team. American School Board Journal, 190(7), 26–29.
11.
Educational Research Service. (1976). Evaluating superintendents and school boards (Report No. 338790). Arlington, VA: Author.
12.
FisherB. A. (1980). Small group decision making (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
GastilJ. (1997). Common problems in small group decision making. InThe group promoter's resource book. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from http://www.fao.org/sd/PPdirect/PPan0009.htm
14.
GemberlingK. W., SmithC. W., & VillaniJ. S. (2000). The key work of school boards guidebook.Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association.
15.
GortnerH. F., MahlerJ., & NicholsonJ. B. (1987). Organization theory: A public perspective.Chicago: Dorsey Press.
16.
GouranD. S. (1974). Discussion: The process of group decision making.New York: Harper & Row.
17.
GriffithsD. E. (1959). Administrative theory.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18.
GriffithsD. E. (Eds.). (1969). Developing taxonomies of organizational behavior in education administration.Chicago: Rand McNally.
19.
HessF. M. (2002). School boards at the dawn of the 21st century: Conditions and challenges of district governance.Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association.
20.
HippenL. H. (1980). Characteristics affecting decision making in selected Illinois school districts. Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI No. 8114571)
21.
HowertonB. (1971). A framework for school board decision making: An analysis of the process. Dissertation Abstracts International.
22.
Institute for Educational Leadership. (2001). Leadership for student learning: Restructuring school district leadership.Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Leadership.
23.
KirstM. (1994). A changing context means school board reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 378–381.
24.
LatimoreR. H. (2000). Dynamics of the decision-making process of a rural school board in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI No. 3006100)
25.
McCallL. K. (1997). A recorded tape analysis of the types and frequencies of decisions made by West Virginia school boards from August 1990 to August 1995. Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI No. 9734409)
26.
MountfordK. (2004). Motives and power of school board members: Implications for school board–superintendent relationships. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 704–741.
27.
National School Boards Foundation. (2001). Improving school board decision making: The data connection.Alexandria, VA: Author.
28.
O'CullH. M. (2001). An investigation of factors influencing school board decision making in West Virginia. Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI No. 3014952)
29.
PhillipsG. M. (1973). Communication and the small group (2nd ed.). New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
30.
RenchlerR. (2000). New patterns of school governance (Report No. EDO-EA-00-07). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED446346)
31.
ResnickM. A. (1999). Effective school governance: A look at today's practice and tomorrow's promise.Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States Distribution Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED433611)
32.
RosenbergerM. K. (1997). Team leadership: School boards at work.Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
33.
SchmidtE. M. (1994). School board actions: Multiple-case studies based on a systems analysis framework. Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI No. 9422681)
34.
SchweigertW. A. (1998). Research methods in psychology: A handbook.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35.
SergiovanniT. J., BurlingameM., CoombsF. S., & ThurstonP. W. (1999). Educational governance and administration (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
ShannonT. A. (1994). The changing local community school board. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 387–390.
37.
ShockD. P. (1960). Patterns in the decision making process of a school board. Dissertation Abstracts International.
38.
SmithM. S., & SmittleW. R. (1954). The board of education and educational policy development.Ann Arbor, MI: Edwards Brothers.
39.
SmoleyE. R.Jr. (1999). Effective school boards: Strategies for improving board performance.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
SwapW. C., BedauH., HillP. H., ChechileR. A., KrimskyS., DunnJ. A., (Eds.). (1984). Group decision making.Beverly Hills: Sage.
41.
Twentieth Century Fund. (1992). Facing the challenge: The report of the twentieth century fund on school governance.New York: Author.
42.
Virginia School Boards Association. (n.d.-a.). Number of school board members. Retrieved on October 23, 2003, from http://www.vsba.org.bdprofile2002.htm
43.
Virginia School Boards Association. (n.d.-b). Virginia—Election of school boards. Retrieved on October 23, 2003, from http://www.vsba.org.Bdelect.htm#