BalfakihN. (2003). The effectiveness of student team-achievement division (STAD) for teaching high school chemistry in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Science Education, 25(5), 605–624.
4.
CooperJ., & RobinsonP. (1997). Small-group instruction: An annotated bibliography of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology resources in higher education. Retrieved June 10, 2002, from http://www.wcer.wics.edu/nise/c11/CL/recource/annbib.htm
5.
DemirelÖ. (1999). Plandan Değerlendirmeye Öğretme Sanatı [Art of teaching from the plan to the evaluation].Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Yayıncılık.
6.
DenzinK. N. (1994). Triangulation in educational research. In HusenT., & PostlethwaiteN. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 6461–6466). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
7.
ErçelebiE. (1995). Geleneksel Öğretim Yöntemleri ile İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yönteminin Matematik Öğretimi Üzerindeki Etkisi [Impact of traditional teaching methods and cooperative learning method on mathematics teaching]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Dokuz Eylül, İzmir, Turkey.
8.
ErdemL. (1994). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenmenin yüksek öğretimdeki başarıya etkisi. [The impact of cooperative learning on success in university education]. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and science], 18(94), 41–47.
9.
GhaithG. (2003). The relationship between forms of instruction, achievement, and perceptions of classroom climate. Educational Research, 45(1), 83–93.
10.
GibsonD. R., & CampbellR. M. (2000). The role of cooperative learning in the training of junior hospital doctors: A study of pediatric senior house officers. Medical Teacher, 22(3), 297–300.
11.
GömleksizM. (1993). Kubaşık Öğrenme Yöntemi ile Geleneksel Yöntemin Demokratik Tutumlar ve Erişiye Etkisi [Impact of traditional teaching methods and the cooperative learning method on democratic attitudes and success]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
12.
HassG., & ParkayW. P. (1993). Curriculum planning: A new approach.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
13.
JohnsonD. W. (1992). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Retrieved June 10, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed347871.html (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED347871)
14.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative competitive and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
KaganS. (1995). We can talk: Cooperative learning in the elementary ESL classroom. Retrieved August 8, 2002, from http://www.ericae.net/edo/ED382035.htm (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED382035)
16.
Karaoğluİ. B. (1998). Geleneksel Öğretim Yöntemleri ile İşbirlikli Öğrenmenin Öğrenci Başarısı, Hatırda Tutma ve Sınıf Yönetimi Üzerindeki Etkileri [Impact of traditional teaching methods and cooperative learning method on the success of students, level of memory, and the management of class]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Dokuz Eylül, İzmir, Turkey.
17.
KimikoT. G. (1997). Interactive activities: Promoting naturalistic exchange inside and outside the second language classroom. Unpublished master's thesis. Toronto, Canada. Graduate Department of East Asian Studies University of Toronto. Retrieved May 18, 2007, from www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ29138.pdf
18.
KurtuluşY. (1998). Sanat Eğitiminde İşbirlikli Öğrenme [Cooperative learning in art education]. Unprinted master's thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
MurrayF. B. (1990). Co-operative teaching. In EntwistleN. (Ed.), Handbook of educational ideas and practices (pp. 859–864). New York: Routledge.
22.
NeberM., FinsterwaldM., & UrbanN. (2001). Cooperative learning with gifted and high-achieving students: A review and meta-analyses of 12 studies. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 199–214.
23.
ÖzdamarK. (1999). SPSS ile Biyoistatistik [Biostatistics with SPSS]. Eskişehir, Turkey: Kaan Kitabevi.
24.
ÖzdenY. (1997). Öğrenme ve Öğretme [Learning and teaching]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Yayını.
25.
ÖzderH. (1996). Tam Öğrenmeye Dayalı İşbirlikli Öğrenme Modelinin Etkililiği [Effectiveness of the cooperative learning method based on mastery learning]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
26.
PalaA. (1995). İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yönteminin Yabancı Dil Öğretimindeki Etkililiği [Effectiveness of cooperative learning method on foreign-language teaching]. Unpublished master's thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
SarıtasM. (1998). İlköğretim Okulları IV. Sınıf Beden Eğitimi Dersi Öğretimine İsbirlikli Öğrenme Yöntemi ve Yarışmalı Öğrenme Yönteminin Etkileri [Impacts of the cooperative learning method and competitive learning method in elementary schools fourth-grade physical education course]. Unpublished master's thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
31.
SenemoğluN. (1997). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim [Development, learning, and teaching]. Ankara, Turkey: Anı Yayıncılık.
32.
SinghanayokC., & HooperS. (1998). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on student's achievement, option, selections, and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(2), 17–33.
SlavinR. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35.
SlowckL. G. (1994, June). Developing and using courseware for cooperative learning activities in the classroom. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Information Technology in Teaching and Education Conference, Brisbare, Australia.
36.
StahlR. J. (1994). The essential elements of cooperative learning in the classroom. Retrieved July 15, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed370881.html (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED370881)
37.
SullivanE. J. (1996). Teaching financial statement analysis: A cooperative learning approach. Journal of Accounting Education, 14(1), 107–111.
38.
TaşpınarM. (1997). Modüler Öğretim Yönteminin Öğretim Yöntemleri Dersinde Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi [The effect of modular teaching on student achievement in teaching method course]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey.
39.
TatlıdilH. (1992). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Analiz [Applied statistical analysis with multiple variables]. İstanbul, Turkey: Akademi Matbaası.
WhickerK. M., NunneryJ. A., & BolL. (1997). Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 91(1), 42–48.
44.
YeşilyaprakB. (1995). Öğretmen adaylarının nitelikleri üzerinde işbirliğiyle öğrenme yönteminin etkisine ilişkin bir araştırma [A study on the impact of the cooperative learning method on the qualities of the teacher candidates]. Paper presented at the International World Teacher Training Conference, August 27–September 2, Ankara, Turkey.
45.
YıldızV. (1999). İşbirlikli öğrenme ve geleneksel öğretimin okul öncesi çocukların temel matematik becerilerinin gelişimi üzerindeki etkileri [Impacts of cooperative learning and traditional learning on the improvement of basic mathematics skills of the preschool period of children]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 23(111), 42–50.
46.
ZiskJ. F. (1998). The effects of cooperative learning on academic self-concept and achievement of secondary chemistry students. Retrieved July 15, 2002, from http://sciteched.org/research/Dis.htm