The Benefits and Problems of Multiple-Intelligence-Based Instruction: A Case Study in Turkey

Anderson L. W. (2002). Curricular alignment: A re-examination. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 255–260.

Armstrong T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Bümen N. (2003). Gözden geçirme stratejisi ile desteklenmiş çoklu zeka kuramı uygulamalarının erişi, tutum ve kalıcılığa etkisi [The effects of implementation of the multiple-intelligences theory supported by reviewing strategies on students’ achievement, attitude, and retention]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 65–78.

Campbell L. (2000). The unspoken dialogue: Beliefs about intelligence, students, and instruction held by a sample of teachers familiar with the theory of multiple intelligences (UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations No. AAT9980445). Retrieved June 1, 2001, from http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9980445

Campbell L. , & Campbell B. (1999). Multiple intelligences and student achievement: Success stories from six schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Campbell L. , Campbell B. , & Dickinson D. (1996). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Coşkungönüllü R. (1998). The effects of multiple intelligences theory on 5th graders’ mathematics ability. Unpublished master's thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Creswell J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Demirel O. (1998, December). Developing integrated skills through multiple intelligences in EFL classrooms. Paper presented at the Fifth Integrated Skills Conference, Cairo, Egypt.

Demirel O. , Akınoğlu O. , Acat B. , Avanoğlu Y. , Bağcıoğlu G. , Özkan B. (1998). İlköğretimde Çoklu Zekâ Kuramının Uygulanması [Implementing the multiple-intelligences theory into elementary education]. In Seventh National Congrees on Educational Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 531–546). Konya, Turkey: Selçuk Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları.

Diaz-Lefebvre R. (2004). Multiple intelligences, learning for understanding, and creative assessment: Some pieces to the puzzle of learning. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 49–57.

Eisner E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.

Gardner H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner H. (1995). “Multiple intelligences” as a catalyst. English Journal, 84(8), 16–18.

Goodnough K. (2001). Enhancing professional knowledge: A case study of an elementary teacher. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(2), 218–236.

Gözütok D. (2001). Başkent Üniversitesi Kolej Ayşeabla Okullarında Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı Uygulaması [Implications of the multiple intelligences in Baskent University Ayseabla College]. Ankara, Turkey: Başkent Üniversitesi.

Gray K. C. , & Waggoner J. E. (2002). Multiple intelligences meet Bloom's taxonomy. Kappa Delta Phi Record, 38(4), 184–187.

Hickey M. G. (2004). “Can I pick more than one project?” Case studies of five teachers who used MI-based instructional planning. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 77–86.

Hoerr T. (2004). How MI informs teaching at New City School. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 40–48.

Kallenbach S. , & Viens J. (2002). Open to interpretation: Multiple intelligences theory in adult literacy education (NCSALL Report No. 21). Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.

Korkmaz H. (2001). Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı Tabanlı Etkin Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Öğrenci Başarısına ve Tutumuna Etkisi [The effects of the multiple-intelligences-based active learning strategies on students’ achievement and attitudes]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 26(119), 71–78.

Kornhaber M. (2004). Multiple intelligences: From the ivory tower to the dusty classroom—but why? Teachers College Record, 106(1), 67–76.

Kornhaber M. , & Fierros E. (2000). Project SUMIT (schools using multiple intelligences theory). Retrieved December 20, 2002, from http://pzweb/harvard.edu/SUMIT/Default.htm

Kornhaber M. L. , & Fierros E. G. (2001, April). Schools using multiple intelligences theory: A framework for understanding implementations of MI that is associated with improvements for students. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.

Kornhaber M. , Fierros E. , & Veenema S. (2004). Multiple intelligences: Best ideas from research and practice. New York: Pearson Education.

Kornhaber M. , & Krechevsky M. (1995). Expanding definitions of learning and teaching: Notes from the MI underground. In Cookson P. , & Schneider B. (Eds.), Transforming schools (pp. 181–208). New York: Garland Press.

Lane C. , Marquardt J. , Meyer M. , & Murray W. (1997). Addressing the lack of motivation and academic achievement in the middle school setting. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED411084)

Lazear D. (2000). The intelligent curriculum. New York: Zephry Press.

McInerney D. M. , & McInerney V. (1998). Educational psychology: Constructing learning. Sydney, Australia: Prentice Hall.

Mettetal G. , Jordan S. , & Harper S. (1997). Attitudes toward a multiple intelligences curriculum. Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 115–122.

Miles M. , & Huberman M. (1994). Qualitative data anaylsis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Noble T. (2004). Integrated the revised Bloom's taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 193–211.

Patton M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Saban A. (2002). Toward a more intelligent school. Educational Leadership, 60(2), 71–73.

Şahin T. (2001). İlköğretim 3. Sınıf Hayat Bilgisi Dersinde Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı Etkinlikleri ve Çoklu Materyal Kullanmanın Öğrenciler Üzerindeki Çeşitli Etkileri [The various effects of the multiple-intelligences activities and multiple materials on third-grade students]. Çağdaş Eğitim, 276, 23–30.

Shore J. R. (2004). Teacher education and multiple intelligences: A case study of multiple intelligences and teacher efficacy in two teacher preparation courses. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 112–139.

Stake R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Weber E. (2001, April). Five-phases to PBL: MITA (multiple intelligence teaching approach) model for redesigned higher education classes. New Horizons Online Journal, 6, 4. Retrieved June 26, 2002, from http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/mi/weber3.htm

Yavuz K. E. (2001). Eğitim-Öğretimde Çoklu Zekâ Teorisi ve Uygulamaları [The multiple intelligences and implications in education and instruction]. Ankara, Turkey: Özel Ceceli Okulları Eğitim Dizisi.