AspinD. N. (1994). Quality schooling.London: Cassell.
2.
BallS. J. (1994). Education reform.Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
3.
BotteryM. (2000a). Managerialism, leadership and assault on educational values. InEducation, policy and ethics (pp. 57–80). London: Continuum.
4.
BotteryM. (2000b). Uses and abuses of quality. InEducation, policy and ethics (pp. 81–103). London: Continuum.
5.
BridgesD., & McLaughlinT. H. (Eds.). (1994). Education and the marketplace.London: Falmer Press.
6.
BushT. (2003). Theories of educational leadership and management (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
7.
CarterD. S. G., & O’ NeilM. H. (Eds.). (1995). International perspectives on educational reform and policy implementation.Brighton, U.K.: Falmer Press.
8.
ChengK. M. (2002). The quest for quality education: The quality assurance movement in Hong Kong. In MokK. H., & ChanK. K. (Eds.), Globalization and education: The quest for quality education in Hong Kong (pp. 41–65). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
9.
CheungA. B. L., & LeeJ. (Eds.). (2001). Public sector reform in Hong Kong into the 21st century.Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
10.
ChiuC. S. (2004). School self-evaluation and professional autonomy. School education reform series No. 17. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, Chinese University of Hong Kong (in Chinese).
11.
ClarkeJ. S. G., & McLaughlinE. (Eds.). (2000). New managerialism, new welfare?London: Sage.
12.
DavidJ. L. (1989). Synthesis of research on school-based management.Educational Leadership, 46(8), 45–53.
13.
DaviesL. (1990). Equity and efficiency? School management in an international context.London: Falmer.
14.
DohertyG. D. (Ed.). (1994). Developing quality systems in education.London: Routledge.
15.
Education Commission. (1997). Education commission report no. 7: Quality school education.Hong Kong: Government Printer.
16.
Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life Learning through life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong.Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Fight for publicity has schools in a spin. (2001, August 9). South China Morning Post.
19.
Fitz-GibbonC. T. (1996). Monitoring education.London: Cassell.
20.
FowlerF. C. (2004). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
21.
HauK. T. (1997). Measuring output indicators of quality school: Some difficult problems. InReponses to ECR No. 7. Occasional Paper No. 5. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, Chinese University of Hong Kong (in Chinese).
22.
KoganM. (1986). Education accountability: An analytical overview.London: Hutchinson.
23.
LamY. L. J. (2001). Economic rationalism and school reforms in developed countries.Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 346–358.
24.
LoN. K. L. (1999a). Quality and equality in the educational development of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland.Educational Research Journal14(1), 13–48.
25.
LoN. K. L. (1999b). Equality in education: The missing issue in the “quality education” debate. InPolicy Bulletin 8.Hong Kong: Hong Kong Policy Research Institute.
26.
MacphersonR. J. S. (1996). Educative accountability.Oxford: Pergamon.
27.
MalenB. (1990). What do we know about school-based management? A case study of the literature, a call for research. In CluneW. H., & WitteJ. F. (Eds.), Choice and control in American education, Vol. 2: The Practice of choice, decentralisation and school restructuring.London: Falmer.
28.
MillerP. J. (1973). Factories, monitorial schools and Jeremy Bentham: The origin of the “management syndrome in popular education.”Journal of Educational Administration and History, 5(1), 10–20.
29.
MokK. H. (1998). Towards quality education: A critical review of Education Commission Report No. 7–Quality School Education. Occasional paper series No. 1, Department of Public and Social Administration. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
30.
MurphyJ., & BeckL. G. (1995). School-based management as school reform: Taking stock.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
31.
Parents favour subsidised private schools. (2000, May 19). Hong Kong Standard.
ReynoldsD. (Ed.). (1985). Studying school effectiveness.London: Falmer.
34.
ReynoldsD., & CuttanceP. (Eds.) (1992). School effectiveness: Research, policy and practice.London: Cassell.
35.
School profiles will not be scrapped. (2000, April 10). South China Morning Post.
36.
SmythJ. (Ed.). (1993). A socially critical view of the self-managing school.London: Falmer.
37.
Students in “value” hunt. (2003, February 20). Hong Kong Standard.
38.
Teachers oppose plan to rate school success. (1999, December 9). South China Morning Post.
39.
TsangD. (1995). Public sector reform: Key issues and future directions. In LeeJ. C. Y., & CheungA. B. L. (Eds.), Public sector reform in Hong Kong: Key concepts, progress-to-date and future directions.Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
40.
TsangW. K. (1997). The deeper meanings of ECR 7: The cult of market efficiency. Occasional Paper No.3. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, Chinese University of Hong Kong (in Chinese).
41.
TsangW. K. (2000). Misuse and misunderstanding of education performance indicators: A critique on the culture of performance-indicator and league-table cult. Occasional Paper No. 34. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, Chinese University of Hong Kong (in Chinese).
42.
TseT. K. C. (2002). A critical review of quality education movement in Hong Kong. In MokK. H., & ChanK. K. (Eds.), Globalization and education: The quest for quality education in Hong Kong (pp. 143–169). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
43.
WagnerR. B. (1989). Accountability in education: A philosophical inquiry.New York: Routledge.