BartolomeF. (1989). Nobody trusts the boss completely—Now what?Harvard Business Review, 67(2), 135–142.
2.
BeesonG., & MatthewsR. (1993, April). Collaborative decision making between new principals and teachers: Policy and practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED361837)
BruhnJ. (2001). Trust and the health of organizations.New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
6.
BrykA., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
ButlerJ., & CantrellR. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates.Psychological Reports, 55, 19–28.
8.
ConleyS., SchmiddleT., & SheddJ. (1988). Teacher participation in the management of school systems.Teacher College Record, 90, 259–280.
9.
CreedW., & MilesR. (1996). Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of control. In KramerR., & TylerT. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 16–38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CurrallS. (1990). The role of interpersonal trust in work relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
11.
DeeJ., & HenkinA. (2001). Smart school teams: Strengthening skills for collaboration.Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
12.
EvansR. (1996). The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity.New York: Simon & Schuster.
14.
GlickmanC. (1990). Pushing school reform to a new age: The seven ironies of school empowerment.Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 68–75.
15.
GlickmanC. (1993). Renewing America's schools: A guide for school-based action.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
GovierT. (1997). Social trust and human communities.London: McGill-Queen's University Press.
17.
HalpinA. (1959). The leader behavior of school superintendents.Chicago: Midwest Administrative Center.
18.
HardinR. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
HenkinA., CistoneP., & DeeJ. (1999). Conflict management strategies of principals in site-based managed schools.School Organization, 14, 142–158.
20.
HenkinA., & DeeJ. (2001). The power of trust: Teams and collective action in self-managed schools.Journal of School Leadership, 11, 49–58.
21.
HoyW., & TarterC. (1995). Administrators solving the problems of practice: Decisionmaking concepts, cases, and consequences.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
HoyW., & Tschannen-MoranM. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools.Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184–208.
23.
HoyW., & Tschannen-MoranM. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in school. The omnibus T-Scale. In HoyW., & MiskelC. (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp. 181–208). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
24.
JamesP. (1998). Chicago school reform: An inside story. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
25.
KimS. (1998). Changes in the environment of local educational administration and the directions for reform.Journal of Educational Administration, 16, 4–13.
26.
KimY. (1999). What are the problems in the current local self-governance system?Educational Development (Korea), 117, 22–25.
27.
KramerR. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions.Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598.
LindskoldS. (1978). Trust development, the GRIT proposal, and conciliatory acts on conflicts and cooperation.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 772–793.
30.
LuhmannN. (1979). Trust and power.New York: Wiley.
31.
MalenB., OgawaR., & KranzJ. (1990). Evidence says site-based management hindered by many factors.School Administrator, 47, 30–32, 53–56, 59.
32.
MattessichP., & MonseyB. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work?St. Paul, MN: Wilder Foundation.
33.
MayerR., DavisJ., & SchoormanF. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
34.
MishraA. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In KramerR., & TylerT. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 261–287). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
MurphyJ. (1991). Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing phenomena.New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
NooteboomB. (2002). Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures, and figures.Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
37.
PodsakoffP., MacKenzieS., MoormanR., & FetterR. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior.Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.
38.
PounderD. (1998). Restructuring schools for collaboration: Promises and pitfalls.Albany, NY: SUNY Press
39.
PowellW. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In StawB., & CummingsL. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 12 (pp. 295–336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40.
PowellW. (1996). Tust-based forms of governance. In KramerR., & TylerT. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 51–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
PutnamR., & BorkoH. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of a new view of cognition. In BiddleB., GoodT., & GoodsonI. (Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 39–51). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
42.
RotterJ. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust.American Psychologist, 26, 443–452.
SchindlerP., & ThomasC. (1993). The structure of interpersonal trust in the workplace.Psychological Reports, 73, 563–573.
45.
SongK. (1997). An alternative model of the relationship between educational autonomy and local autonomy.Study of Social and Educational Science (Korea), 2, 45–72.
46.
Tschannen-MoranM. (1998). Trust and collaboration in urban elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
47.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2000). Collaboration and the needfor trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 335–352.
48.
Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyW. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning and measurement of trust.Review of Educational Research, 70, 547–593.
49.
Tschannen-MoranM., UlineC., HoyW., & MackleyT. (2000). Creating smarter schools through collaboration.Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 247–271.
50.
WarahA. (2001). Trust-building in organizations: A fundamental component of risk management models.Optimum: The Journal of Public Sector Management, 30, 94–98.
51.
WebbW., & WorchelP. (1986). Trust and distrust. In WorchelS., & AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 134–165). Chicago: Nelson-Hill.
52.
YoungM. (1998, April). Importance of trust in increasing parental involvement and student achievement in Mexican American communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED423587)
53.
YuklG. (1989). Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
54.
YunC. (2000). Redistribution of roles and functions between central and local education authorities.Journal of Educational Administration (Korea), 18, 159–172.
55.
ZandD. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229–239.