BrownB., & SaksD. (1987). The microeconomics of the allocation of teachers’ time and student learning.Ecmomics of Education Review,6, 319–332.
2.
CardD., & KruegerA. (1992). Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 3358.Journal of Political Economy,100, 1–40.
3.
CarrollJ. (1963). A model of school learning.Teachers College Record,64, 723–733.
4.
DenhamC., & LiebermanA. (Eds.). (1980). Time to learn.Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
HeckR., MarcoilidesG., & GlasmanN. (1989). The application of causal modeling techniques to administrative decision making: The case of teacher allocation.Educational Administration Quarterly,25, 253–267.
7.
KarweitN. (1984). Time-on-task reconsidered: Synthesis of research on time and learning.Educational Leadership,41, 32–35.
8.
LeithwoodK., & StagerM. (1989). Expertise in principals’ problem solving.Educational Administration Quarterly,25, 126–161.
9.
LevinH., & TsangM. (1987). Economics of student time.Economics of Education Review,6, 357–364.
10.
RiceJ., CronigerR., & RoellkeC. (2002). The effect of block scheduling high school mathematics courses on student achievement and teachers’ use of time: Implications for educational productivity.Economics of Education Review,21, 599–608.
11.
RobertsR., SchraderR., & HarrymanM. (1986). Productive use of time: An attack on declining achievement.Journal of Human Behavior and Learning,3, 32–40.
12.
SimonH. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making processes in administrative organization (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
13.
WileyD., & HarnischfegerA. (1974). Explosion of a myth: Quantity of schooling and exposure to instruction, major educational vehicles.Educational Researcher,3, 7–12.