BagleyC., WoodsP. A., & ClatterR. (2001). Rejecting schools: Towards a fuller understanding of the process of parental choice.School Leadership and Management,21(3), 309–325.
2.
BenjaminiK., & TatarM. (1992). The ways of school choice by parents.Issues in Education,57, 193–207 (Hebrew).
3.
BenjaminiK., & TatarM. (1994). The image of school in the eyes of parents.Megamot [Trends], 36(1), 49–66(Hebrew).
4.
CarlsonR. V. (1996). Reframing and reform: Perspectives on organization, leadership and school changeNew York: Longman.
5.
CarrollS., & WalfordG. (1997). The child's voice in school choice.Educational Management and Administration,25(2), 169–180.
6.
ChubbJ. E., & MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools.Washington, DC: Brookings.
7.
CooksonP. W. (1994). School choice: The struggle for the soul of American education.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods of inquiry. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 23–41). New York: Macmillan.
11.
FoskettN. (1998). Schools and marketization.Educational Management and Administration,26(2), 197–210.
12.
FoskettN., & Hemsley-BrownJ. (2001). Choosing futures: Young people's decision-making in education, training and careers markets.London: Routledge-Falmer.
13.
GewirtzS., BallS. J., & BoweR. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education.London: Open University Press.
14.
GlaserG., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.Chicago: Aldine.
15.
GleggA. (2002). Reflections of diversity: British Columbia's independent schools as indicators of changing parental priorities.International Journal of Educational Reform,11(4), 297–308.
16.
GloverD. (1992). Community perceptions of the strengths of individual schools: The basis of “judgment.”Educational Management and Administration,20(4), 223–230.
17.
GoldringE. B. (1991). Parents’ motives for choosing a privatized public school: An Israeli example.Educational Policy,5, 412–426.
18.
GorardS. (1996). A choice of methods: The methodology of choice.Research in Education,57(1), 45–56.
19.
GorardS. (1997). School choice in an established market.Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
20.
GorardS. (1999). Well. That about wraps it up for school choice research: A state of the art review.School Leadership & Management,19(1), 25–47.
21.
GraceG. (1994). Education is a public good: On the need to resist the domination of economic science. In BridgesD., & McLaughlinT. H. (Eds.), Education and the marketplace.London: Falmer.
22.
HaymannF., GolanH., & ShapiraR. (1997). School autonomy and parental choice: Steps in local educational planning. In ShapiraR., & CooksonP. WJr. (Eds.), Autonomy and change in context: An international perspective (pp. 77–108). Oxford: Pergamon.
23.
HirschD. (1994). School: A matter of choice.Paris, OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
24.
LevinB. (2001). Reforming education: From origins to outcomes.London: Routledge.
25.
MaddausJ. (1990). Parental choice of schools: What parents think and do. In CazdenC. B. (Ed.),Review of research in education (pp. 267–296). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
26.
Marko-ShohamH. (1996). Personal, communal and institutional characteristics and patterns of parents’ choice in high schools. MA dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
OgawaR. T., & DuttonJ. S. (1994). Parental choice in education: Examining the underlying assumptions.Urban Education,29(3), 270–279.
30.
OplatkaI. (2002a). The emergence of educational marketing: Lessons from the experiences of Israeli principals.Comparative Education Review,46(2), 211–233.
31.
OplatkaI. (2002b). Secondary school brochures: What they tell us about diversity in a local educational arena.Education and Society,20(3), 45–60.
32.
OplatkaI., Hemsley-BrownJ., & FoskettN. H. (2002). The voice of teachers in marketing their school: personal perspectives in competitive environments.School Leadership and Management,22(2), 177–196.
33.
PatonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
34.
PetersonP. E., & HasselB. C. (1998). Learning from school choice.Washington, DC: Brookings.
35.
PowersJ. M., & CooksonP. W. (1999). The politics of school choice research: Fact, fiction and statistics.Educational Policy,13(1-2), 104–122.
36.
ReayD., & BallS. (1998). Spoilt for choice: The working classes and educational markets.Oxford Review of Education,23(1), 89–101.
37.
ReayD., & LuceyH. (2000). Children, school choice and social differences.Educational Studies,26(1), 83–100.
38.
SchofieldJ. W. (1993). Increasing the generalisability of qualitative research. In HammersleyM. (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues (vol. 1, pp. 91–113). London: Paul Chapman Publishing/OUP.
39.
SmedleyD. (1995). Marketing secondary schools to parents: Some lessons from the research on parental choice.Educational Management & Administration,23(2), 96–103.
40.
TeelkenC. (1999). Market mechanisms in education: School choice in the Netherlands, England and Scotland in a comparative perspective.Comparative Education,35(3), 283–302.
41.
Tel Aviv Municipality. (1999). Tel Aviv-Jaffa: Major trends and characteristics.Tel Aviv: Center for Social-Economic Studies.
42.
TooleyJ. (1992). The pink tank on the education reform act.British Journal of Educational Studies,40(4), 335–349.
43.
WoodsP. (1994). School responses to the quasi-market. In HalsteadJ. M. (Ed.), Parental choice and education (pp. 124–138). London: Kogan Page.