BaldridgeJ. V. (1975). Organizational innovation: Individual, structural, and environmental impact. In BaldridgeJ. V., & DealT. E. (Eds.), Managing change in educational organizations.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
2.
BaldridgeJ. V, & DealT. E., (Eds.) (1975). Managing change in educational organizations.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
3.
BennisW. G. (1993). Beyond bureaucracy.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BennisW. G., BenneK. D., & ChinR. (Eds.). (1969). The planning of change.2nd edition.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Wilson.
5.
California Department of Education. (1989). The new California school, VII (1). Sacramento, CA: Author.
6.
California Department of Education. (1995). Every child a reader: The report of the California Reading Task Force.Sacramento, CA: Author.
7.
California Department of Education. (1996). A guide to challenge school district reform. REL#96-19. Sacramento, CA: Author.
8.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century (Report of the Task Force cm Teaching as a Profession).New York: CFEE.
9.
Commission on Public School Administration and Leadership. (1988). Return to greatness: Strategies for powerful improvements in our schools.Sacramento: CA: Association of California School Administrators.
10.
CreamerE. G., & CreamerD. G. (1986). Applying a model of planned change to a programinnovation. Journal of College Student Development27(1), 19–26.
11.
DamanpourF. (1991). Organizational innovations: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators.Academy of Management Journal,34(3), 555–590.
12.
DuttonW. H., RogersE. M., & JunK. H. (1987). Diffusion and social impacts of personal computers.Communications Research,14(2), 219–250.
13.
EastinD. (1995, September). California Department of Education press release: “Challenge to California schools.”Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Education.
14.
FirestoneWilliam A. (1989, Summer). Using reform: Conceptualizing district initiative.Educational Review and Policy Analysis,11(2), 151–164.
15.
FutrellM. H. (1990). Preparing students for tomorrow's political world. In BacharachS. B. (Ed.), Education reform: Making sense of it all.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
GayL. R. (1981). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
17.
HallG. E., & HordS. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process.New York: SUNY Press.
18.
HerriottR., & GrossN. (Eds.). (1979). The dynamics of planned educational change: An analysis of the rural experimental schools program.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
19.
HubermanA. M., & MilesM. (1984). Innovation up close.New York: Plenum.
20.
KidderL. H., & JuddC. M. (1986). Research methods in social relations.5th edition.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
21.
McCabeL. L. (1997). California superintendents and their views of the Challenge School District Reform Initative. Unpublished dissertation, University of Southern California.
22.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at-risk.Washington, DC: Author.
23.
National Governor's Association. (1986). A time for results.Washington, DC: Author.
24.
NuskeC. J. (1993). The role of management in the planned change process. Unpublished dissertation, University of Virginia.
25.
RebarberT. (1992). State policies for school restructuring. Presentation at Better Education through Informed Legislation series. National Conference of State Legislatures, Denver.
26.
RogersE. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations.3rd edition.New York: Macmillan.