Abdal-HaqqI. (1998, October 1). Professional development schools: What do we know? What do we need to know? How do we find out? Who do we tell? Paper presented at the National Professional Development School Conference, Baltimore.
2.
BrownR., & WellsC. (1988). North Carolina teacher appraisal instrument.Raleigh: North Carolina Dept. of Public Instruction.
3.
ClarkR. (1990). What school leaders can do to help change teacher education.Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
4.
CunninghamT. (1988). North Carolina teacher appraisal instrument evaluator's guide.Raleigh: North Carolina Dept. of Public Instruction.
5.
Darling-HammondL. (1994). Developing professional development schools: Early lessons, challenge, and promise. In Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession (pp. 1–27). New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
FullanM., & HargreavesA. (1992). Teacher development and educational change.Washington, DC: Falmer.
7.
GoodladJ. (1990). Teachers for our nation's schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
GuytonE., FoxM., & SiskK. (1991). Comparison of teacher attitudes, teacher efficacy, and teacher performance of first year teachers prepared by alternative and traditional education programs.Action in Teacher Education,13(2), 1–9.
9.
HawkeF. (1987). Implications for teacher evaluation standards.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices6(2), 18–23.
10.
HawthorneR. (1997). Impact on colleges of education. In HoffmanN., ReedW., & RosenbluthG. (Eds.), Lessons from restructuring experiences: Stories of change in professional development schools (pp. 295–322). New York: State University of New ‘York Press.
11.
HayesH., WetherillK., CalhounJ., & BeamanL. (1996, March). Professional development system: Collaboration for quality education. A paper presented at the Association of Teacher Education 1996 Distinguished Program in Teacher Education Award, St. Louis, Missouri.
12.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group.East Lansing, MI: Author.
13.
Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools.East Lansing, All: Author.
14.
KennedyM. (1990). Professional development schools.NCRTE Colloquy,3(2).
15.
LevineM., & TrachtmanR. (1998, March). Making professional development schools work: Politics, practice, and policy.NASSP Bulletin2(1), 12–15.
16.
MurphyJ. (1990). Helping teachers prepare to work in restructured schools.Journal of Teacher Education,41(4), 50–56.
17.
NeufeldB., & Boris-SchacterS. (1991). Professional development schools in Massachusetts: Maintenance and growth.Boston: Massachusetts Center for Teaching and Learning.
18.
SedlakM. (1987). Tomorrow's teachers: The essential arguments of the Holmes Group Report.Reforming Teacher Education,88(3), 314–325.
19.
SergiovanniT. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
TonerT., AybarJ. M., & FinchN. F. (1996, January-April). “Walking the talk”: The Holmes Group principles in action.International Journal: Continuous Improvement Monitor,1(2). Edinburg, TX, University of Texas-Pan American, Center for Applied Research in Education.
21.
WinitskyN., StoddartT., & O'KeefeP. (1992). Great expectations: Emergent professional development schools.Journal of Teacher Education,43(1), 3–18.
22.
WyneA., WhiteR., StuckJ., & CoopS. (1985). Educational reliability and assesment approaches.Journal of Educational Measurement22(1), 13–17.