BerneR., & StiefelL. (1999). Concepts of school finance equity: 1970 to the present. In LaddH., ChalkR., & HansenJ. (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance (pp. 7–33). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2.
BrooksD. (2000). Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there.New York: Simon and Schuster.
3.
BurtlessG. (1996). Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
4.
ClarkT. N. (1998). The new political culture. In ClarkT., & Hoffmann-MartinotV. (Eds.), The new political culture.Boulder, CO: Westview.
ColemanJ., CampbellE., HobsonC., McPartlandJ., MoodA., WeinfeldF., & YorkR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity.Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
7.
ColemanJ., HofferT., & KilgoreS. (1982). High school achievement: Public, catholic, and private schools compared.New York: Basic Books.
8.
CubberlyE. (1905). School funds and their apportionment.New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
EvansW., MurrayS., and SchwabR. (1999). The impact of court-mandated school finance reform. In LaddH., ChalkR., & HansenJ. (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance (pp. 72–98). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
FastrupJ. (1997). Fiscal equalization and access to educational resources in the New England states.Journal of Education Finance,22, 368–393.
11.
GoldbergC. (1999, April 3). School crisis chips away at New Hampshire's anti-tax stance.New York Times, p. A9.
12.
HallD. (1998). Lessons from New Hampshire: What we can learn from the history of the state's role in school finance, 1642–1998.New Hampshire Center for Public Policy Studies. Retrieved from http://www.unh.edu/ipssr/nhcpps
13.
HanushekE. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance.Educational Researcher,18(4), 45–62.
14.
HanushekE. (1994). Making schools work.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15.
HeapsR., & WoolfA. (2000). Evaluation of Act 60: Vermont's education financing law.Burlington, VT: Northern Economic Consulting. Retrieved from http://www.vteconomy.com/research.html
16.
HedgesL., LaineR., & GreenwaldR. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes.Educational Researcher,23, 5–14.
17.
HeiseM. (1995). State constitutions, school finance litigation, and the “third wave”: From equity to adequacy.Temple Law Review,68: 1151–1176.
18.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
JainP. (2000). Explaining non-incremental changes in state policy: The case of Vermont. Unpublished dissertation, University of Chicago.
20.
JainP. (1997). State-local relations in education and land growth policy: A case study of Vermont. Dissertation proposal, Department of Education, University of Chicago.
21.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities.New York: Crown Publishing.
22.
LaddH., & HansenJ. (1999). Making money matter: Financing America's schools.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23.
Maine Department of Education (MDE). (2000). Commissioner's recommended funding level fiscal year 2000.Augusta, ME: Author.
24.
MeersmanN. (2001, January 18). Judge kills state's education tax.Manchester Union Leader.
25.
MinorniP., & SugarmanS. (1999). Educational adequacy and the courts: The promise and problems of moving to a new paradigm. In LaddH., ChalkR., & HansenJ. (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26.
MurnaneR., & LevyF. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills.New York: Free Press.
27.
National Center for Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk.Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
28.
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). (1996). The search for equity in school funding.Education Partners Working Papers. Denver: Author.
29.
OddenA. (2000). The new school finance: Providing adequacy and improving equity.Journal of Education Finance,25, 467–488.
30.
OddenA., & PicusL. (2000). School finance: A policy perspective.Dubuque, IA: Mc-Graw Hill.
31.
PetersonP. (1981). City limits.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
SilvernailD. (2000). Maine school funding 2000 update: In transition to an adequacy model.CEPARE: University of Southern Maine. Retrieved from http://www.cepare.usm.maine.edu
33.
SmithM., & O'DayJ. (1991). Systemic school reform. In FuhrmanS., & MalenB. (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233–268). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
34.
WiseA. (1968). Rich schools, poor schools.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
WongK. (1999). School funding: Politics and policies.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.