AlmasiJ. F., McKeownM. G., & BeckI. L. (1996). The nature of engaged reading in classroom discussions of literature. Journal of Literacy Research28(1), 107–146.
AppleM. W. (1990). Ideology and curriculum.London: Routledge.
4.
BaxtonG. P, ElderA. D., & GlaserR. (1996). Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom. Educational Psychologist, 5/(2), 133–140.
5.
BeckI. L., McKeownM. G., WorthyJ., SandoraC. A., & KucanL. (1996). Questioning the author: A year-long classroom implementation to engage students with text. The Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 387–416.
6.
BrittM. A., RouetJ. F., & PerfettiC. A. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In RouetJ. F., LevonenJ. J., DillonA. P., & SpiroR. J. (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BrooksJ. G., & BrooksM. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms.Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.
8.
CaiJ., MagoneM. E., WangN., & LaneS. (1996). Describing student performance qualitatively. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 1(10), 828–835.
9.
California Academic Press. (1997). Free-pilot student test-free. Internet release, as of 7/9/97.
10.
DeVriesR., & ZanB. (1995). Creating a constructivist classroom atmosphere. Young Children (November), 4–13.
11.
DuitR., TreagustD. E, & MansfieldH. (1996). Investigating student understanding as a prerequisite to improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. In TreagustD. F., DuitR., & FraserB. J. (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics.New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
GreenoJ. G., CollinsA., & ResnickL. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In BerlinerD. C. & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology.New York: Macmillan.
13.
GronlundN. E. (1995). Haw to write and use instructional objectives.New York: Macmillan.
14.
LinnR. L., & GronlundN. E. (1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
15.
McKeownM. G., BeckI. L., & SandoraC. A. (1996). Questioning the Author: An approach to developing meaningful classroom discourse. In GravesM. G., TaylorM. M., & Van den BroekP. (Eds.), The first R: A right of all children.New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
NovakJ. D. (1996). Concept mapping: A tool for improving science teaching and learning. In TreagustD. F., DuitR., & FraserB. J. (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics.New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
ParnellD. (1996). Why do I have to leant this?Waco, TX: CORD Communications.
18.
PerkinsD. (1994). Do students understand understanding?Education Digest (January 1).
19.
ResnickL. B., & Resnick. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In GiffordB. R. & O'ConnorM. C. (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction.Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
20.
West Virginia Office of School-to-Work. (1997). The history of ReadiSkills.West Virginia Department of Education.