BaldwinR. (Ed.), (1997). Law and uncertainty: Risks and legal processes.London: Kluwer Law International.
2.
BenvenisteG. (1986). Implementation and intervention strategies: The case of PL 94-142. In KirpD. and JensenD. (Eds.), School days, rule days: The legalization and regulation of education.Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
3.
BrownL., and DauerF. (1982). A synopsis of the theory and practice of school law, part 11. Preventive Law Reporter, 3, 18–36.
4.
FisseB. (1987). Risk minimization through preventive law. Law Society Journal (July), 54–58.
5.
HartmeisterF. (1995). “School law: What principals learn in colleges of education compared with what they need to know in the ‘real world.’” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Education Law Association in Kansas City, November.
6.
KlomanH. (1984). Risk management: 1990 and beyond. Risk Management (March).
7.
KnottA. (1994). “Legal risk management by teachers as employees.” Paper presented atthe annual conference of the Australia and New Zealand Education Law Association, in Brisbane, Australia, June.
8.
MacGrimmonK., and WehrungD. (1986). Taking risks: The management of uncertainty.London: Falmer Press.
9.
MenackerJ., and PascarellaE. (1982). How aware are educators of Supreme Court decisions that affect them?Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 424–426.
10.
MinorJ., and MinorV. (1991). Risk management in schools: A guide to minimizing liability.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
11.
NelkinD. (1985). The language of risk.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
12.
PellS. (1994). Pre-service teachers’ lack of knowledge of education law: Ignorance is no excuse. Illinois School Law Journal, 14(4), 159–172.
13.
RossowL. (1990). The principalship: Dimensions in instructional leadership.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
San MiguelG. (1997). The profit side of legal risk management. Journal of Risk Management (February), 72.
15.
SarasonS. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
School Law Reporter, monthly publication of the Education Law Association, Dayton, Ohio.
17.
SergiovanniT. (1987). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
StewartD. (1996). Principals knowledge of law affecting schools. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Law and Education, 1(1), 111–129.
19.
StewartD. (1998). Principals and preventive legal risk management. In EhrichL. and KnightJ. (Eds.), Leadership in crisis? Restructuring principled practice.Queensland, Australia: Post Pressed.
20.
StewartD. (1998a). Legalization of education: Implications for principals’ professional knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(2), 129–145.
21.
StrahanR., and TurnerL. (1987). The courts and the schools: The school administrator and legal risk management today.New York: Longman.
22.
ValsamakisA., VivianR., and du ToitG. (1995). The theory and principles of risk management.Johannesburg: Heinemann.
23.
VaughanE. (1997). Risk management.New York: John Wiley.
24.
WaringA., and GlendonA. (1998). Managing risk.London: International Thomson Business Press.
25.
WilliamsP. (1995). “Educational negligence: An Australian perspective.” Working Paper Series, School of Business Law, Curtin University, Western Australia (95:10) October.
26.
ZirkelP. (1978). A test on Supreme Court decisions affecting education. Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 521–555.