BainH. P., AchillesC. M., Boyd-ZahariusJ., and McKennaB. (1992). Class size does make a difference. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 3.
2.
BauersfeldH. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In GrouwsC. A., CooneyT. J., and JonesD. (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching. A publication of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
BoalerJ. (2000). Exploring situated insights into research and learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 1.
4.
BorkoH., EisenhartM., BrownC. A., UnderfillR. G., JonesD., and AgardP. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily?Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 3.
5.
BrophyJ. E., and GoodT. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
6.
BurrillG. (1998). President's message: TIMSS—what can we learn?NCTM News Bulletin, 34, 8.
CothernN. B. (1999). Standards and in-service teachers: Learning to own the concept of reform. International Journal of Educational Reform, 8, 3.
9.
HollandR. (1999). A goals 2000 in 2001?Education Week, 19, 7.
10.
JohnsonW. L., and JohnsonA. M. (1995). The purpose and processes of educational systems. International Journal of Educational Reform, 4, 4.
11.
MercerC. D., and HarrisC. A. (1993). First invited response: Reforming reforms in mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 6.
12.
PetersonP. L. (1988). Teaching for higher-order thinking in mathematics: The challenge for the next decade. In GrouwsC. A., CooneyT. J., and JonesD. (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching. A publication of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
PosnerG. J., StrikeK. A., HewsonP. W., and GertzogW. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
14.
ReysR. E., SuydamM. N., LindquistM. M., and SmithN. L. (1998). Helping children learn mathematics (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
RossS. M., and SmithL. J. (1994). Effects of success for all model on kindergarten through second-grade reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 95, 2.
16.
RossS. M., and SmithL. J. (1995). Current research. School Library Media Quarterly, 24, 1.
17.
SchmidtW., McKnightC., JakwerthP., KoganL., RaizenS, HouangR., ValverdeG., WileyD., WolfeR., BianchiL., YangW., KangS., and BrittonE. (1998). A summary of facing the consequences.Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18.
SellersP. A., and AhernK. A. (1999). “Predictors of pedagogical and conceptual change in pre-service teachers.” Paper presented atthe Midwest Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, October.
19.
SkempR. (1976). Relational and instrumental understanding. The Arithmetic Teacher (November 9–15).
20.
StandingE. M. (1957). Maria Montessori: Her life and work.Fresno, CA.: Academy Guild Press.
21.
StiglerJ. W., and HiebertJ. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Deltan Kappan, 79, 1.
22.
StipekD., SalmonJ. M., GivvinE. K., SaxeG., and MacGyversV L. (1998). The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 4.
23.
WoodT., and SellersP. (1997). Assessment of a problem-centered mathematics program: Third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3, 337–353.
24.
YeagerR. E. (1997). Science teacher preparation as a part of systemic reform in the United States. In RhotonJ. and BowersP. (Eds.), Issues in Science Education.Arlington, VA: National Science Teacher Association.